Is it more fun to tickle someone who isn't "into" it?

[CodeNameT]

Meaning, to them its just innocent horseplay or at the most just a way of flirting. Of course this assumes they think that's all it is for you also. For me I think that is more exciting because it tends to make for more spontaneous tickles, plotting your next attack, waiting for the right opportunity and then you strike! LOL

Or is it more satisfying to tickle someone who shares your passion? Do you sacrifice spontaneity at all when you're both into it and you both know it?

 

[saratk]

I've never tickled anyone that even said they like it...I'm actually dying to do that.

 

[Artoo]

Well, I kind of see where you're going with the spontenaity thing, but you can do that just as easily with someone who is into it as well.

I think the bond between ler and lee becomes much stronger when they are both into it, mainly because they both know that the other person is enjoying it as much as they are.

 

[DownUnder]

Personally, I'd be more interested in tickling someone who is "into" it.

I'm not a big fan of spontaneity (tickling or other aspects of life). Recently I had a chance to tickle a friend's feet while we went for a walk. She's not into it (as far as I know), and even though I did get the desired reaction, she withdrew quickly and didn't want any more of it. I'd have been far happier had she been more cooperative, for another hour or so 🙂

 

[Deleted member 66627]

I think the bond between ler and lee becomes much stronger when they are both into it, mainly because they both know that the other person is enjoying it as much as they are.

Agreed.

 

[Musicroxmysox]

I feel it's better to tickle those into the whole tickling thing. I mean others may appreciate it, but it's not the same.

 

[TMF Jeff]

I love tickling people who aren't into being tickled, because there's a much stronger element of it being torture and non-consensual, which are both fun in the right context. I also love it when the person doesn't know they're going to get tickled and it just hits them out of nowhere, like one second they're having an adult conversation and then POW: laughing hysterically and begging for mercy.

That said, I also like the other, tickling someone who is into it, and sharing a sort of intimate connection.

 

[MrTicklefeet]

I prefer tickling someone who's into it. It's a shared pleasure, and one can play for hours. Can't do that with my friends, not if I want to keep them anyway.

 

[luvgirlsfeet]

its WAY MORE FUN to tickle someone who is into than one who isnt

 

[huskys]

I'd prefer someone who was "into it" as well.
You woudn't have to stop prematurely, to find out if they were enjoying it, cause you know they would be.
Just flash a cheeky wink every now and then, and carry on with the fun!!!

 

[mikethetickler]

I think both are great. It gives the experience of both kinds. No matter what, the end result is helpless laughter!

 

[duannewalton]

It's much better when they're into it.

 

[Mephistopheles]

I never tickled someone who was actually into it but for the ones I tickled that weren't it was great fun because you know that when they beg for mercy they really mean it.

 

[the wiz]

My co-worker told me, she perfer to have someone bond and beat her with a whip, than to be tickled for 2 minutes.

so, i would have to say it's better if the lee is into it.

 

[Adam]

Actually, I much prefer to tickle someone that's into it like I am. Main reason? You never know how someone that's not may react. I'm not looking for a punch in the face. 😀

 

[BellaRisa]

I love tickling people who aren't into being tickled, because there's a much stronger element of it being torture and non-consensual, which are both fun in the right context. I also love it when the person doesn't know they're going to get tickled and it just hits them out of nowhere, like one second they're having an adult conversation and then POW: laughing hysterically and begging for mercy.

That said, I also like the other, tickling someone who is into it, and sharing a sort of intimate connection.

What he said; and I've never noticed a difference in sponteneity, the fact that you're both into it does NOT mean you know exactly when the next attack is coming. I'm never ready for it, I get caught off-guard at my own parties for cryin' out loud...🙄

 

[taz_tickler]

For me, its always much more fun tickling and being tickled by someone who's into it...it's all about fun and pleasure for both sides.

 

[CuteJill143]

Meaning, to them its just innocent horseplay or at the most just a way of flirting. Of course this assumes they think that's all it is for you also. For me I think that is more exciting because it tends to make for more spontaneous tickles, plotting your next attack, waiting for the right opportunity and then you strike! LOL

Or is it more satisfying to tickle someone who shares your passion? Do you sacrifice spontaneity at all when you're both into it and you both know it?

Well, for me It is more of a surprise when I find myself being tickled by someone who doesn't know about my interest & if they don't have it. Its just exciting to enjoy being tickled with someone who doesn't have the fetish because there is some mystery involved. Its very spontaneous. As much as I love all of you, I would know what to expect already if I were to meet with any of you lol. The only thing that I could compare my feelings too are gay men and how they've told me that they fantasize more about straight men. Its because its less likely to happen which makes you fantasize more about the situation. Male LERS on TMF I am sure you are more likely to fantasize about tickling the cute chic from work or a celebrity female rather than a girl on the tmf (as sexy as we all may be ) And Female LERs, I am sure you're thinking more about being tickled by a new boy toy in your life or a hot football star or any hot guy you see at the gym with nice big arms that you're imagining pinning you down on your sofa!!! lol. I can admit that I fantasize more about people who don't have it. But I love all of you!! so don't take offense!
Unless somebody just wants cut to the chase and proceed with all the experimental tickling you want, it can be loads fun to practice it with someone with the shared interest. For the more intense more sensual side as well as bondage, I would rather practice with an experienced LER who also has my fetish because then there is no fear of holding back what I want and need to try. There is much more of an understanding that it wouldn't be just flirty play.

 

[Ticklerguy4u]

I have to say I enjoy someone that is into it. I can be fun to tickle someone that isn't into it but the odds are that there is a fifty chance they will want it to happen again and again. I rather have a sure thing.

 

[Skipadeedoodah]

I see the appeal of both. It's always a nice surprise to get tickled when you're totally not expecting it, but like alot of you said already, it's often over too soon. So playing with someone who likes it as much as I do can make the tickling last longer, which is fun 🙂

 

[CuteJill143]

I see the appeal of both. It's always a nice surprise to get tickled when you're totally not expecting it, but like alot of you said already, it's often over too soon. So playing with someone who likes it as much as I do can make the tickling last longer, which is fun 🙂

Yes its always over too soon =( I agree and it happens more in the beginning with a new person cuz they use it to "break the ice"

 

[makeUsquirm]

I'd definitely rather tickle somebody whose into it. If they're not into it, being tickled is probably an annoyance.

 

[minerva]

I definitely prefer being tickled by someone who's 'into it' and understands the dynamic.
Someone who's not would probably stop as soon I'd beg them to, someone's who 'understands' knows, that what I really want is him to tease me and continue 😉