Is NUDITY necessary when you tickle someone?

[ParadiseTickle]

But of course...

You don't think even superheroines can wear nylons underneath their booties, too? heehee

www.ticklingparadise.com

 

[viper1225]

You don't think even superheroines can wear nylons underneath their booties, too? heehee

www.ticklingparadise.com

Does this mean we can look forward to a video of superheroines tickled on their stocking feet? I hope so!!!

 

[ChicagoTickler]

An unequivocal YES

 

[viper1225]

An unequivocal YES

Yahoo!!!

 

[ElephantEye]

If I'm tickling a girl in the bedroom, yes I want her naked, although playful non-bondage tickling is fun too.

In clips I prefer both with the girls nude and in bikinis, bra/panties, halters/shorts, etc, so long as they don't cover TOO much up. And frankly, a lot of models look better with a bit of clothing than completely nude.

But, yeah, nothing beats a firm fit nude model like Wenona.

Actually, would like to edit to say in clips my favorite is the girl wearing only a tiny string bikini bottom. Just watched a couple clips and realized how that little piece of fabric emphasizes the rest of her bare skin.

 

[Masque]

I can settle for either depending on my mood in the moment.
Like sometimes it can be as simple as a fun contrast like if the lee is in a bikini, she's got all those spots available but still got thqt little bit of modesty left.

 

[enlightened]

Nudity is an absolute necessity! I want complete unhindered access to all ticklish spots without clothing getting in the way. One girl wanted to keep her panties on, so I tied her up, and pulled down her pants around her ankles. I told her, "You're STILL wearing them. They're just down around your ankles!" She cussed me out at first, but ended up having a fantastic time.

 

[olmi]

Think I'm going to pee against the wind, here. But I do prefer my models clothed. As someone said before, many girls (and boys, but that's not the point) look better when not fully nude. And even for those who don't, I tend to find it disturbing when the 'lee is naked, mixed signals if you like. I don't mind that much when the 'ler is naked, but that's probably because nobody really looks the 'ler 🙂

That being said, there's a few models where topless is ok (first comes to mind the lovely Rachelle from UKTickling), but I wouldn't say nudity gets things better for me.

Another reason why, I suppose, is some studios just get lazy when they use naked models. TickleAbuse comes to mind, especially.

 

[ticklingj]

I really enjoy a little bit of clothing. Bra and panties. Maybe shorts and a tank top. Very little.

 

[Libertine]

"Is NUDITY necessary when you tickle someone?" was the original question, as in

'When YOU tickle someone'.

However, the thread's roughly a 75% discussion of watching video clips, mainly featuring superheroines and cheerleaders.

To me, a proper IRL session with the girl tied to something generally ends in sex, so unless you've a mutual thing for cutting the clothing off her, which strikes me as potentially dangerous unless bandage scissors are used (not to mention a waste of time and fabric) I prefer full nudity on her part, or maybe a pair of holdups.

Kittentoes is giggling as she's reading this over my shoulder, and has insisted that I allow Sir Patrick Stewart himself to answer the nudity question, so here he is.

youtube.com/watch?v=Fg_cwI1Xj4M

 

[Wesker28]

Picard productions 😉

"Is NUDITY necessary when you tickle someone?"

For me No, not just to tickle my gf.
However if one is in the bedroom or somewhere where one wants to engage in a more personal and sexual tickling, yes.

 

[Laura_vd]

For me its not

 

[lostphilosopher]

To myself, personally no.

 

[rwm01man]

I prefer clothed myself...cut off jean shorts with sleeveless or strapless tops...

 

[TKMarick]

Tickling is eroticism, it doesn't need nudity

 

[crazytickling]

It is not, but to be barefoot is necessary.