Maybe tickling isn't such bad work after all... (warning: explicit!)

[asutickler1]

This forum is private property. The mods can do whatever they want, at the discretion of the owner. Quit bitching or go buy your own webspace.


That picture was disgusting, by the way. If I owned the place, it would've disappeared as soon as I saw it...

 

[MistressValerie1]

Nessie is correct -- we don't usually take official moderator actions unless a post is reported by a member or obviously violates the rules (such as copyright infringement). Whenever possible, we discuss questionable or borderline cases before taking action. All moderator actions are reversible, though I personally would not reverse another mod's decision unless it were an obvious error (such as deleting the wrong post) because normally the admin should be the one to reverse a judgement decision.

We are only human, so none of us is perfect, but we all do our very best to act on behalf of the forum owner for the good of the community. Ness is more outgoing than I am, so she expresses herself more openly as a member than I do. That is her style, and it has served her and the forum very ably during her tenure. I am more reserved about offering my opinions as a member in certain matters because that happens to be my style. The two of us have a synergy because of our different approaches to interacting on the board; neither style is "better" or "worse," just different.

Ironically, the only moderator action taken in this thread was when I added a stronger cautionary note to the thread title; Ness didn't edit or delete anything here. I believe that there is a miscommunication between Ness and some members who view her as having taken implicit moderator action in this thread, but in truth she was merely speaking as a member who felt that others might have found the video shocking because that kind of subject matter is not typical for this forum.

I hope that everyone will now let this matter drop before this thread goes completely out of control.

Best regards,

 

[nessonite1]

Why are you trying to bait me into something? The term "blowing things out of proportion" comes to mind.
If/when we delete something it certainly wouldn't be solely because we disagree with someone's point of view. If that were the case I'd be deleting things right and left cause I certainly don't agree with everything anybody says. If I were deleting everything I disagreed with this thread and it's link would have disapeared as soon as I saw it.
If something is deleted it is usually for one of the same few reasons.
It contains content from a paysite and/or a banned producer
It is obvious trolling
It is obvious spamming
It doesn't directly violate the rules but is very controversial and/or has gotten a lot of complains and/or a thread that has turned into a flame war

While we do try to make all members happy we realize that it's impossible to please everyone all the time. In the end it's the admin that we answer to. This is an open forum but, as was pointed out above, it is privately owned and payed for.

 

[wendyandpeter]

It doesn't directly violate the rules but is very controversial and/or has gotten a lot of complains and/or a thread that has turned into a flame war

OK, since this gets to the heart of it, let's just address this. In *my* opinion, the only element of this statement that isn't highly subjective is the complaints part, and I suspect it only takes one from the right person to get someone else's thoughts censored.

You are absolutely right about this being a privately owned site -- I've pointed that out on a few occasions myself. HOWEVER, that's all the more reason for the Admin to be concerned that the forum is run with integrity.

If an idea or post becomes hotly debated, that means, by definition that it's controversial. That does NOT (I hope) mean the debate should be censored. Calling people names is one thing, strongly expressing a belief is another. In my estimation, Mods should ask one question before deleting anyone's ideas (and thus, invalidating them): Does this post violate the RULES? That question alone involves interpretation, and for the sake of integrity, I would think that would be the most subjectivity anyone would want to interject. Censoring people's thoughts merely because they are controversial, or because someone else has complained about them, or because they are part of a heated debate should NEVER be grounds for censorship.

The truth is that Nessonite cannot wear two hats. Anytime you post, your post carries with it the weight of your position as a moderator - that just comes with the job. Therefore, you should be mindful of that, and stop getting in the middle of controversial threads, taking sides "as a member," then if everyone doesn't fall into line with your way of thinking, deleting the "controversial" posts "as a moderator."

**I would propose the following as a rule for Mods, to preserve fairness:

If a Mod has participated in (posted to) a thread in such a way that it could be said that he or she took sides with one or more member's viewpoint, that moderator should refrain from taking actions as a moderator pertaining to that thread.

I think that's very fair. Valerie? Other mods? Agree?

 

[Mercury1]

I have to agree with Nessonite with this one. In the sense that this kind of thing (the link to that particular site) is not to my liking.

Personally, I come here for what this Board is for: tickling. Now, I haven't clicked on that link, and after what Nessonite said (that is has semen dripping out of someone's butt) I have absolutely no intention to. :| I come to this Board to watch, view, etc. with tickling, not hard-core porn. That's just ME. Now, granted, some people like that kind of thing. I don't.

Just my two cents. I'm sure others on this Board didn't look at that site for the same reasons I didn't. Again, I don't know. I'm just exercising my privilege as a member here to add my opinion. 😛 Toodles for now!

 

[wendyandpeter]

Jeeeesus... OK, see, here's the thing. Ticklevids posted this link as part of a joke. The joke entails the fact that semen dripping from that woman's ass is gross -- That was the point, you see. He said "Maybe tickling isn't such bad work," then linked us to a site where a tickling model has obviously gotten worse work. Funny, see? He he. The joke is that getting tickled in a video is better than getting buttfucked in a video. A normal adult would have laughed and said "yep, see your point, there's obviously worse work out there." Instead, he got -- "oh my gosh, I don't even see the humor in your post because that picture is SO disgusting and beyond the pale .. it isn't even funny." THAT's why he started talking about church ladies.

The irony is that one of the people who was oh, so offended was just last week telling people to get over being offended at simulated underage porn. So apparently, simulated child pornography is not nearly as offensive as anal sex.

I suspect that if the semen had been dripping out of a man's ass, any posts saying "that's gross" would have been deleted.

 

[jim66bbc]

Jeeeesus... OK, see, here's the thing. Ticklevids posted this link as part of a joke. The joke entails the fact that semen dripping from that woman's ass is gross -- That was the point, you see. He said "Maybe tickling isn't such bad work," then linked us to a site where a tickling model has obviously gotten worse work. Funny, see? He he. The joke is that getting tickled in a video is better than getting buttfucked in a video. A normal adult would have laughed and said "yep, see your point, there's obviously worse work out there." Instead, he got -- "oh my gosh, I don't even see the humor in your post because that picture is SO disgusting and beyond the pale .. it isn't even funny." THAT's why he started talking about church ladies.

The irony is that one of the people who was oh, so offended was just last week telling people to get over being offended at simulated underage porn. So apparently, simulated child pornography is not nearly as offensive as anal sex.

I suspect that if the semen had been dripping out of a man's ass, any posts saying "that's gross" would have been deleted.

It appears that you were the only one to consider it a joke or find it funny. And considering normal is determained by the purality position, I wouldn't call your reaction that of a normal adult.

 

[wendyandpeter]

LOL !! I'll tell Ticklevids to cancel his booking at the comedy club in Des Moines.

And yeah, I thought it was fucking hilarious.

 

[ticklevids]

actually... my gig in Des Moines is on!

And I'll have real live "semen dripping from ass tickling models who had a slow month and had to fill in their schedules with other work" girls on stage with me demonstrating the ins and outs of why tickling isn't such bad work after all.


Just as an aside— I'll bet any amount of money the biggest screamers of "YUCK! THERE SEMEN DRIPPING OUT HER ASS!" are the biggest anal porn collectors of all.

Just like those republican anti-gay politicians who always seem to be caught in the gay bars.

 

[jim66bbc]

Just as an aside— I'll bet any amount of money the biggest screamers of "YUCK! THERE SEMEN DRIPPING OUT HER ASS!" are the biggest anal porn collectors of all.

.

Do I count as one of those? Because I would love to take that bet. I could pay for college, then grad school, maybe a new car as well. Ah, that would be sweet.

 

[drizzay01]

Okay, kinda off topic from the things everyone else is saying, but...

Reguardless of whether or not you are a "Mod". I think....Well....let me put it this way

Okay. i don't like butts, I don't like Semen...lol.(Yeah, I know, i'm a guy, I have to deal with it. It's sticky though =/) I don't like the two combined. Is it sick? no. How can anyone on a fetish related site say that any other form of sexual activity is sick?. It just seems hypocritical. Ya know?

 

[wendyandpeter]

Okay, kinda off topic from the things everyone else is saying, but...

Reguardless of whether or not you are a "Mod". I think....Well....let me put it this way

Okay. i don't like butts, I don't like Semen...lol.(Yeah, I know, i'm a guy, I have to deal with it. It's sticky though =/) I don't like the two combined. Is it sick? no. How can anyone on a fetish related site say that any other form of sexual activity is sick?. It just seems hypocritical. Ya know?

Yes, we know. Jesus, talk about a harmless joke gone awry.

 

[nessonite1]

Goofy, I think we've all kinda moved on with our lives. Time to drop the discussion. ^^

 

[wendyandpeter]

I have a novel idea.... How about letting people decide for themselves when they want to stop commenting on a thread, instead of being condescending and arrogant towards them. Would that be OK, mom?

 

[Hungarian21]

oh my god, this is like 6th grade again. Look, there are rules, but sadly, non-pointless arguing is not 1 of them. I see I cant stop you from keeping this up, so I'll just ask this: What do you get out of it?

 

[wendyandpeter]

I guess the same thing you got out of posting your last post?

 

[Hungarian21]

:happy:lol, true.

 

[nessonite1]

Just didnt see the need to dig up arguments that had run their course already. If that's your thing then hey, knock yourself out.