Miami woman took fetish pornography to a disturbing extreme

[sonnymadler]

Man, that's some news! Now I'm considering deleting all the Megan tickling clips I have on my hard drive.

 

[wrestlingclown]

You guys are being pretty harsh.

These women participated in these videos when they were just 20 or 21 years old. They were coerced into doing them by an older man.

Studies show that the vast majority of people will hurt other people if they are told to do so by an authority figure. History shows this to be true also (see the holocaust).

These women have admitted they now regret that they participated in these videos.

The charges were dropped because as 3rd degree felonies they were long past the statute of limitations. The videos were made in 2006.

 

[Sandrock74]

Well, since you mentioned the Holocaust as an example, it should be pointed out that the post-war crime trials did not consider "I was just following orders" as an excuse. After all, it's easy to regret your actions after you're caught.

 

[Dr. Bill Kobb]

Gawd. Just reading the comments has me positive it should be banned, and the practitioners arrested! there's no way I'm clicking on the actual news story. I don't like hearing about animals being hurt.

 

[CTS Film Crew]

I'm just reading the articles about this, and the descriptions aren't that bad. I wouldn't condone it, because personally I dislike crush fetish with live animals, just looks really nasty.

I do however take exception to them NOT being charged and serving time for this, only because they knew it was wrong.

However, I'm also not going to hold that against them. People will make mistakes, and some of those mistakes aren't mistake, but I'd still not hold it against them.

 

[TTT for joy]

Interesting to see the conversation going in different directions here, and very glad to see everyone reacting with revulsion. I was unsure whether I should weigh in with a vegan perspective, but it seems relevant. I agree with everyone here that this behavior is revolting, but what exactly is the difference between satisfying a sexual preference and satisfying a taste preference? In both cases a sentient creature is unnecessarily made to suffer unto death.

I suppose it is relevant, but it's a whole another debate. I think there is still some kind of difference between the two. First of all: People who eat meat don't derive any kind of pleasure directly from animal suffering, but only from the meat itself. Also the animals can be domesticated without having them suffer too much. If domestication isn't done right, then sure animals are going to suffer a lot, but it can be done at least to some extent in a humane way.
I admit it sounds hypocritical to enjoy meat and yet be shocked by animal cruelty, but at the end of the day we humans are predators by nature and probably the only predators who to some extent care about the well being of their prey.

 

[SlaverTickler]

More disturbing is that there is a viable market for this ghoul to sell what evil she purveys in the first place. The word "Fetish" as used in the story is inaccurate, as when a so-called "fetish" involves the harm of non-consensual innocents; it stops being a fetish and becomes sociopathic psychosis... or the old fashioned term, "fucked up pure evil."

Paul Bernardo & Karla Hamulka used to sell videos of him raping women in Scarborough.

 

[Dussicar]

You guys are being pretty harsh.

These women participated in these videos when they were just 20 or 21 years old. They were coerced into doing them by an older man.

Studies show that the vast majority of people will hurt other people if they are told to do so by an authority figure. History shows this to be true also (see the holocaust).

These women have admitted they now regret that they participated in these videos.

The charges were dropped because as 3rd degree felonies they were long past the statute of limitations. The videos were made in 2006.

You know what?

What you've just said is a valid argument. But you still have to pick-and-weed through what people say sincerely vs. what they might say in an attemp to exhonerate themselves at all costs.

If what they say is sincere, then I'll change my opinion to support them.

The authority figure analogy you have provided is correct.

But remember that some people will throw others under the bus just to get themselves out of trouble.

I figured we learned this lesson with that Cindy Schubert incident.