A few things - sorry if I am reviving or beating a dea horse here, but -
First of all, this -
- wins the thread.
Secondly, I firmly believe that there is nothing wrong about having the occasional desire to non-consentually tickle someone. It's crossed all of our minds at some point, even if it was only a playful notion, not a malicious one. However, acting on it, of course, is not only morally incorrect, but illegal and fucking retarded, and that someone who would have TRULY done what this producer claims to have done should be arraigned on multiple charges, including but not limited to battery and sexual assault.
Thirdly, This is an OLD debate, as the clip is what, over a decade old now? I had some opinions on this when I first saw it, but I was a kid back then and have had several experiences that change my thoughts about this. I am now a producer of tickling videos as well, and as such, I find it very, very offensive that the producer would actually try to sell this as a true story. As a producer, I have a certain level of baseline respect for my customers, and on the occasion that I do try to implement a storyline or plot to a video, I make a concerted effort to TRY to assume the good people who spend their hard-earned dollars on my products are intelligent enough to want to be sold a story beyond the written description. I find it disgusting on a professional level that this producer, as old as the video and concept may be, even bothered stressing how "real" and "torturous" this was for the model when he doesn't bother ANY thought whatsoever into the consistency of the video itself. I also cannot comprehend how anyone, at any time, bought the story.
First of all, this -
- wins the thread.
Secondly, I firmly believe that there is nothing wrong about having the occasional desire to non-consentually tickle someone. It's crossed all of our minds at some point, even if it was only a playful notion, not a malicious one. However, acting on it, of course, is not only morally incorrect, but illegal and fucking retarded, and that someone who would have TRULY done what this producer claims to have done should be arraigned on multiple charges, including but not limited to battery and sexual assault.
Thirdly, This is an OLD debate, as the clip is what, over a decade old now? I had some opinions on this when I first saw it, but I was a kid back then and have had several experiences that change my thoughts about this. I am now a producer of tickling videos as well, and as such, I find it very, very offensive that the producer would actually try to sell this as a true story. As a producer, I have a certain level of baseline respect for my customers, and on the occasion that I do try to implement a storyline or plot to a video, I make a concerted effort to TRY to assume the good people who spend their hard-earned dollars on my products are intelligent enough to want to be sold a story beyond the written description. I find it disgusting on a professional level that this producer, as old as the video and concept may be, even bothered stressing how "real" and "torturous" this was for the model when he doesn't bother ANY thought whatsoever into the consistency of the video itself. I also cannot comprehend how anyone, at any time, bought the story.
and horrifying or disgusting to me...)
And I don't know that there's really/always some way to tell the difference -- Some claim there are obvious markers, but I'm not about to buy that crap to find out -
) disclaimer, if not an exit interview, stating those who participated were fully informed, aware & willing THROUGHOUT the film.... 
