the concept of semantics is a very curious thing, and often amusing. For example, a kid off the street can go into a recording studio, knowing nothing about music, vent his anger to a canned pedestrian rhythm, and be hailed as an "artist."
Yes, semantics can be downright intriguing. For another example, people can judge that kid's music, knowing little or nothing about him or the amount of hard work, determination and skill it takes to create his material, and call themselves "critics." And just as he has the right to be called an "artist" by his fans, his "critics" have the right to criticize. To each his own.
But equating a desire to share files over the internet with "wanting something for nothing" is way stretching it.
True. The simple desire to share is joyful and magnanimous, and should be taught to small children and loved ones. But taking and taking and taking and taking, then expecting the producers of what you take to provide more for the taking while you give them little or nothing in return to help them provide what you wish to take, is indeed "wanting something for nothing." Is it wrong? That opinion varies. Is it a hindrance to the production of new material? Yes indeed. I'm sure there's someplace where models work for free, and video equipment is paid for with good intentions. I haven't been there.
When I walk into a store, I don't argue with the clerk that his products should be free. I fully expect to pay for whatever I walk out with.
Good. But if you then help many others to enjoy the store's merchandise without paying for it, justified by your one purchase, the store won't be able to afford to stay open for very long, or they'll have to raise their prices quite a bit to compensate. That's bad for everyone.
If I go to AMT and see photos and JPEGS of tickling material posted, I download the ones I like. I'm still honoring the agreement with the person providing this material.
Nuh-uh, probably not. Chances are pret-ty good that the original producer didn't wish his hard work to be given away, and whomever you got it from isn't that producer. Lots of good little vid companies open and close with rapid succession, or rarely put out new offerings. Wonder why.
In case you weren't aware, some of us like to share and contribute material for the benefit of the community. This attitude was more prevalent a few years ago, but is now being discouraged, primarily by those wanting to squeeze out every possible dime of profit.
That depends on what you mean by 'benefit'. As I've said, the sharing and contributing you mention isn't being performed by the creators of said material. And if the creators can't afford to produce new work because people keep 'sharing' rather than purchasing, soon there will be very little new work to 'share'. How is that a benefit?
I think it's lovely that the community wants to share with each other. I was a member of the community long before I ever picked up a camcorder. But all too often folks are sharing work they didn't create themselves, and very often it's not even from videos they themselves purchased.
I agree with you that the tide has turned as far as people wanting to profit from their hard work, when once upon a time it didn't seem to matter. From what I can tell, things changed when smaller, independent producers who specialized in tickling began making videos. We used to only have big huge fetish video houses that made all kinds of material, and didn't really understand our kink. They had no idea AMT and such places existed, and seemed so large and anonymous that no one cared about sharing their stills and making clips. They were faceless. These days, we have one or two-man operations that truly love tickling, and know what we want to see because they wanna see it too. They *need* their profits to make ends meet and make new videos, they can't rely on many other kinks to pay for the models and lights and equipment. And they're here, amongst us, so they know when their stuff is being 'shared'.
I have no problem at ALL with sharing material you create yourself, and I *do* understand the community POV. But doing that with others' material without their permission does more harm than good in the long run, however people choose to rationalize it with warm community sentiments.