• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

The safeword won't get her out of this torture

what a joke...

you guys that grace us with a whole "10 SECOND PREVIEW", which is usually closer to 6 or 7, is a complete waste of my time. if you don't have enough faith in your product to allow us to see a "decent" preview, there's no sense in even going to your site in the first place...
 
Nice Clip

Lexi Lee has an incredible body, a real pleasure to see being tickled.
I like the way she keeps asking for it to stop! Begging is Awesome!!!

Now please tickle her feet with no safeword!!!

Thanks, Adrian
 
Ignoring a safeword seems like a bad policy for someone who wants to keep hiring models.
 
and even when she calls the safeword, the torture continues!

Sorry to say this, but that doesn't seem like a very wise move. The models are being open-minded and cooperative enough to pose for what are very weird videos to most people. Not to mention the physical discomfort they agree to endure. They deserve to be able to trust you. But how can they if you don't respect the safeword? Why do you even determine a safeword in the first place if you don't stop when a model says it?
 
you guys that grace us with a whole "10 SECOND PREVIEW", which is usually closer to 6 or 7, is a complete waste of my time

Actually, this one is 30 seconds long, which is more than enough for a free preview. Do you expect producers to make their preview half the length of the full clips? If you still feel they're a waste of your time, no one's forcing you to watch them. You're more than welcome to completely ignore them from now on.
 
it's o.k.

Lexi Lee is a tickle video regular...overused like Viviana, Christina Carter, Wenona and Veronika Rachel...

...they've got the act down pat...so I'm sure it's all safe.
 
Sorry to say this, but that doesn't seem like a very wise move. The models are being open-minded and cooperative enough to pose for what are very weird videos to most people. Not to mention the physical discomfort they agree to endure. They deserve to be able to trust you. But how can they if you don't respect the safeword? Why do you even determine a safeword in the first place if you don't stop when a model says it?

fact
 
Agreed....

Lexi Lee is a tickle video regular...overused like Viviana, Christina Carter, Wenona and Veronika Rachel...

...they've got the act down pat...so I'm sure it's all safe.

Lexi Lee got the treatment from Evan ~ SilverCherry a few years back. She has been around...
 
Lexi's a great model...she's worked with at least 3 other ticklers that I have seen, all with great results 🙂

On the subject of ignoring safewords...well we've been here before http://www.ticklingforum.com/showthread.php?t=110474

A display of disregard for the trust given by a model? Harmless shock fantasy juxtaposed with a familiar, yet abstract marketing ploy?
To be honest...from the clip it looked like the former, but at the end of the day pros like Lexi can always vote with their feet if they feel "violated". :sherlock:



:england:
 
Interjection on the safeword issue:

This debate comes up about once a month with Skely's videos. He's not actually ignoring a safeword. The models are either told to yell it for effect, or he uses a tiered safeword system. Keep in mind, he works with the same models over and over again.

Plus these debates also gain him huge publicity 😉

If you really want to read through that kind of argument, just look through the archives. They're all there.
 
They probably negotiated beforehand to ignore the safeword. Or like LD says, using the tiered system. In the world of BDSM a 'safeword' is a fairly recent invention originally used as a warning that whatever activity enaged in was getting too close to becoming dangerous or truly traumatic; not something used when a player needed a break.

Breaks were something a Dom/Master/Mistress granted, either by request of the sub or by their own judgement. Even now, plenty of people who play together and have learned to gauge their partner's reactions don't use them.

Also fact.

Skel SELLS us clips. I GIVE him the benefit of the doubt.

Why so serious?
 
Skel SELLS us clips. I GIVE him the benefit of the doubt.

Why so serious?

Because it's a serious issue. Respecting the models and earning their trust is of utmost importance. Now, Skelyrata has explained the situation to me, and as far as what goes on between him and Lexi Lee, it's actually fine. But you can't blame people for raising an eyebrow when they read a claim about a safety word being ignored. It might just be for publicity, but as a producer myself, I think it's important that potential models understand that when safewords are used, they're usually respected.

Also, not all models are into BDSM. In fact, very few of mine are. Most of my models are just ordinary people with little or no experience with fetish stuff. Doing a fetish video is actually quite a wild, adventurous experience for them, and not something they're likely to repeat very often, if at all. Not to mention that my shoots have almost nothing to do with BDSM. So you can't apply BDSM practices to them and assume they'll be ok with it just because they appear in a fetish video. Besides, even within the BDSM world, there has to be some level of trust between the players, and if a safeword is determined, it should be respected. If the tickler/dom/etc. doesn't want to stop when a safeword is used, then the arrangement should be "no safewords". At least that's how I see it.
 
Because it's a serious issue. Respecting the models and earning their trust is of utmost importance. Now, Skelyrata has explained the situation to me, and as far as what goes on between him and Lexi Lee, it's actually fine. But you can't blame people for raising an eyebrow when they read a claim about a safety word being ignored. It might just be for publicity, but as a producer myself, I think it's important that potential models understand that when safewords are used, they're usually respected.

Also, not all models are into BDSM. In fact, very few of mine are. Most of my models are just ordinary people with little or no experience with fetish stuff. Doing a fetish video is actually quite a wild, adventurous experience for them, and not something they're likely to repeat very often, if at all. Not to mention that my shoots have almost nothing to do with BDSM. So you can't apply BDSM practices to them and assume they'll be ok with it just because they appear in a fetish video. Besides, even within the BDSM world, there has to be some level of trust between the players, and if a safeword is determined, it should be respected. If the tickler/dom/etc. doesn't want to stop when a safeword is used, then the arrangement should be "no safewords". At least that's how I see it.


fact again!
 
Because it's a serious issue. Respecting the models and earning their trust is of utmost importance. Now, Skelyrata has explained the situation to me, and as far as what goes on between him and Lexi Lee, it's actually fine. But you can't blame people for raising an eyebrow when they read a claim about a safety word being ignored. It might just be for publicity, but as a producer myself, I think it's important that potential models understand that when safewords are used, they're usually respected.

Also, not all models are into BDSM. In fact, very few of mine are. Most of my models are just ordinary people with little or no experience with fetish stuff. Doing a fetish video is actually quite a wild, adventurous experience for them, and not something they're likely to repeat very often, if at all. Not to mention that my shoots have almost nothing to do with BDSM. So you can't apply BDSM practices to them and assume they'll be ok with it just because they appear in a fetish video. Besides, even within the BDSM world, there has to be some level of trust between the players, and if a safeword is determined, it should be respected. If the tickler/dom/etc. doesn't want to stop when a safeword is used, then the arrangement should be "no safewords". At least that's how I see it.

Thank you - I didn't realize this was an ongoing (tactic?) with this producer, I've otherwise enjoyed his material --- but this is really disappointing.

I'd tend to think (hope) it's all for show BUT -- I'm not comfortable making assumptions with someone else's agony... :illogical

It's a highly irresponsible claim unless it's made absolutely clear somewhere, I don't care how fine the print --- that this isn't really non-con,
that alternate arrangments (time limit, or another safeword or gesture)
were worked out with the model for her (or his) comfort & well-being.
 
I love you guys!

There is one thing that I love about forums! You get to see so many different feedbacks to one item, specially if is a peace that pinch somebody's nerves.

Yet, I have learned in this very same forum that is better if I stay slient when the clip in discussion is mine, because no matter how I explain things, I will always lose on someone's eye!

So I just ask you all, use your common sense, and you will find the answer you are looking for.

Also, I recommend you all watching the full length videos, and make a deeper review.

Either way, thank you all for expressing your concerns and comments.
 
Last edited:
of course...

...there is the old line, "The only bad publicity is no publicity," and there are some topics that will always draw a crowd. I don't know if that equates to more clips sales, especially when non-ticklish models, who have already appeared in too many videos, are utilized.
 
Respecting the models and earning their trust is of utmost importance. Now, Skelyrata has explained the situation to me, and as far as what goes on between him and Lexi Lee, it's actually fine.

Kind of what many of us though already? Using both our past experience and reasonable mind instead of just the emotional part? Really? Well! Imagine, some of us being right and knowing what we are talking about and trusting Skelyrata to make the right choices to begin with. Examining what the bigger picture could ACTUALLY be between consenting adults RATHER than the narrow view of how things “should” that many people seemed to have here in this thread, or automatically assuming the worst in someone who has been on the TMF for years as a video producer. It’s fine? Thank goodness I was on the right side the whole time - I was beginning to doubt it myself.

But you can't blame people for raising an eyebrow when they read a claim about a safety word being ignored.

I can, if they believe everything they read on the internet as being the absolute truth & then get pants-wettingly over-reactive about it with a video producer who has generally shown himself to be a responsible person in the past. Perhaps they should try to get more info, or work things out in their mind before typing out their cyber-stoning, or just let their reservations be known without getting so frantic. Send a PM and see what’s what, since that’s obviously what happened between you and Skel. Anyone can do this.

It might just be for publicity, but as a producer myself, I think it's important that potential models understand that when safewords are used, they're usually respected.

She’s been in other videos, pointed out before I even made my post. So I’m betting she knows the score.

Also, not all models are into BDSM. In fact, very few of mine are. Most of my models are just ordinary people with little or no experience with fetish stuff. .

I know - your mother/daughter video is one of the best videos ever, and my favorite of your series. And mom didn't seem to care at all if daughter had had enough or not - she just kept going, and you helped, even writing that you felt kind of bad but went ahead and continued anyway because mom was so into it. Now I’m looking at this situation only by what was presented to the public, having no knowledge of what went on behind the scenes during negotiations & directing….. but the fact that in your production a safe word apparently wasn’t brought up - even if only for all participants to agree to ignore it - involving people who are not experienced in fetish play, is a serious issue, too. That's closer to a health risk or exploitation that what Skel did here. I love that mom/daughter video so much I'd like to see some follow-up sequel type of videos made with those two participants (and the daughter’s friend who was underage at the time & couldn’t be video-ed) . Except those sequels will probably never happen since according to your site the daughter decided that she would never do such a video again after being in one of your productions. So Skelrata using a bondage model clearly with experience and trying something new (ignoring a safe word, which they both could have negotiated and agreed to since Skel seems to be an up-and-up individual, you know, for a fetish pervert) or getting non-BDSM players (who could really use a safe word) and wearing them out to the point of permanent trauma…. I gotta side with Skel. Not Guilty!


Doing a fetish video is actually quite a wild, adventurous experience for them, and not something they're likely to repeat very often, if at all. Not to mention that my shoots have almost nothing to do with BDSM. So you can't apply BDSM practices to them and ….

We aren’t talking about your videos, at least on the original topic. We are talking about Skel’s videos and using the culture of BDSM as the backdrop of the discussion

Why are they not likely to repeat the experience very often? Because of what happened to them? That makes me wonder. I have non-fetish friends I’ve introduced tickling to - with restraints in some cases. They now use that in their private play because it was such a joyful experience overall even though it may have been difficult to take in a few moments here and there. They may never do a video, but they aren’t giving up tickling with bondage any time soon. I know Twin Feather Studios is about to shoot their second video with a model who had never done bondage/tickling before TFS. It’s not her style, not her thing - but she came back. . Maybe it’s how people are treated which dictates whether they go back to tickling with bondage or leave it alone forever.

Plus, if there are restraints involved, and there’s a clear differential of power, while a physical stimulus is being applied which is difficult to withstand, that’s BDSM.


If the tickler/dom/etc. doesn't want to stop when a safeword is used, then the arrangement should be "no safewords".

Why? When did that become the only choice?

Or -- the dom could used the tiered system, or respond to a hand signal with the “ignored safeword” idea used for dramatic effect for the viewer (this is adult entertainment/fantasy after all). Or they could have already agreed beforehand - both parties, responsible adults all - to bring up the safe word only to ignore it because it then makes the scene more about the control issue between the two players (and seems more sadistically dramatic for the viewing audience). Trust is maintained. And good drama created for the viewer.

Or some other things I haven’t thought of here. It doesn’t only have to be THIS - or THAT.

I don’t like to use safe words when I’m under the ropes because I know I’m such a wimp I’ll blurt one out in a panic. I hate that panicky feeling, but often, when it is all over, that is exactly what I needed. It’s like getting an injection at the Dr.s office - it feels bad, but it turns out it keeps you feeling great overall. I want to be challenged and taken further than I think I can, so when I play as a sub I try to figure with the play partner out how I can avoid a safe word meltdown while still being safe. So let’s apply this to the topic: An experienced model like Lexy is probably familiar with this concept to some degree. I don’t see any evidence that she was betrayed in this video, just that a safe word was ignored. That was part of the scene. All scenes are different.

Fact, pwned, win-win-win, daisy-pushed, whatever slang these days that passes for being right and being cool at the same time.

Sometimes, even when it looks weird and not how we‘d play, people know what they are doing. Why so serious?
 
Except those sequels will probably never happen since according to your site the daughter decided that she would never do such a video again after being in one of your productions.

Ah, excuse me, you're talking without knowing anything about what went on that day (yes, kinda like Skelyrata, but I didn't claim to ignore a safeword). It has nothing to do with the tickling or how she was treated. You want to know what happened? Her and her mother came from out of town, and no matter how hard myself and another person tried to explain to them how to get to the studio by car, they managed to get seriously lost, totally missing the huge bridge they were supposed to cross. Well, miss Annie decided to be pissed about that, even though it wasn't my fault in any way. She acted annoyed from time to time during the shoot. At the end, I was a bit tired of her childish attitude, and explained that I was sorry about the inconvenience, but there was really noting I could do about it. Well, she didn't like being told the truth and decided that another shoot wouldn't be worth her trouble. Besides, she didn't very much like being tickled, period, regardless of the intensity. So the reasons for there not being a sequel to that video are a model's immaturity, her dislike for any sort of tickling, and the fact that she lived 3 hours away. Plus I wouldn't have wanted to work with her a second time after having to deal with her behavior for an entire shoot. It wasn't a pleasant experience. It's too bad, because the mom was very nice and understanding.

We aren’t talking about your videos, at least on the original topic. We are talking about Skel’s videos and using the culture of BDSM as the backdrop of the discussion

So you're saying that just because I happen to be a producer myself I can't contribute to the discussion? Besides, I don't see what the BDSM culture has to do with anything. We're talking about safewords used in tickling videos.

Why are they not likely to repeat the experience very often? Because of what happened to them?

No, it's because while some non-fetish people might be willing to do it again, not everyone is especially interested in doing something that's physically exhausting a second time if they're not particularly into it. You think most people give it a try once and suddenly become totally addicted to getting tickled on camera for other people's arousal, wanting to do it again and again? Sorry, that's not reality. Besides, some of my models have done more than one video, and more would have if I didn't prefer to work with new models.

Sometimes, even when it looks weird and not how we‘d play, people know what they are doing. Why so serious?

I'm afraid you just don't understand, or care to understand, so conversation is over.
 
There is one thing that I love about forums! You get to see so many different feedbacks to one item, specially if is a peace that pinch somebody's nerves.

Yet, I have learned in this very same forum that is better if I stay slient when the clip in discussion is mine, because no matter how I explain things, I will always lose on someone's eye!

So I just ask you all, use your common sense, and you will find the answer you are looking for.

Also, I recommend you all watching the full length videos, and make a deeper review.

Either way, thank you all for expressing your concerns and comments.

Hey for your next shoot make the safeword...GIVE ME A COLD SHOWER! lol when the model says it..you give her a cold shower haha of course this works in a outside envirment 😀
 
Oddjob and Last Laugh - it's for effect and publicity. Seriously, give it a rest.

Not to try and stand in the way of discussion, but the whole point is moot. Skel pretty well admits that it's for show, and his models return... it's very clearly not an actual human rights issue here.
 
Not to try and stand in the way of discussion, but the whole point is moot. Skel pretty well admits that it's for show, and his models return... it's very clearly not an actual human rights issue here.
Well, those were the only two choices - either the video was faked, or he was abusing the model. Can't say either one looks very good on him though.
 
Wrong on both counts

Well, those were the only two choices - either the video was faked, or he was abusing the model. Can't say either one looks very good on him though.

Sorry but you are wrong on both counts.

The video is not fake and I did not abuse her.
 
What's New

11/23/2024
Visit Clips4Sale! Tickling clips beyond number!
Tickle Experiment
Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** LadyInternet ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Back
Top