GuldenVleugel
TMF Master
- Joined
- Nov 9, 2002
- Messages
- 804
- Points
- 0
On Wikipedia there's an interesting article on tickle torture. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tickle_torture.
It also features some real life reports about tickling torture in real life, and one of such where an angry husband tickles his spouse until she fainted. By recovering from her unconciousness she has become so traumatized she lost her sanity, literally, and had to spent her life in an institution.
My question is, is tickling really this dangerous?
I know, among us tickle enthusiasts and among people who trust each other tickling revenge only belongs to fiction. People view it as necessary for it to be consentual or semi-consentual at the least (you know the situation where your body forces you to want to leave, but where the actual person wants to receive more).
Also, I must add that angry tickling scares the hell outta me and isn't a turn on in the least bit for me. I like vicious torturous prolonged tickling. I like situation where she loses control for a LOONG time (it's many a 'lees dream to be able to be tickled for hours and it's many a 'lers dream to have a mentally strong 'lee, yet insanely ticklish).
However, this made me also think about that non-con vid by tickleparadise in the day; it made me furious along with many over here. There is a small group of people who likes victims who hate tickling no matter how violently and respectlesly she's treated or how scared she is, but most of us are for (semi-)consentual, luckily.
I wonder if this would be possible with a willing 'lee wanting to be tortured for hours for her to lose her sanity. Was it only the woman's fear for her husband and hatred for being tickled by a person she hated or for being tickled in general, that made her traumatized?
I want opinions on this.
It also features some real life reports about tickling torture in real life, and one of such where an angry husband tickles his spouse until she fainted. By recovering from her unconciousness she has become so traumatized she lost her sanity, literally, and had to spent her life in an institution.
First, Horrible Murder: An Anthology of Victorian Crime and Passion Compiled from the Illustrated Police News (by Leonard De Vries, published by Book Club Associates in London in 1974) (pp 73-4) reissued a news item first published in the Illustrated Police News on December 11, 1869: 'A Wife Driven Insane by Husband Tickling Her Feet.' The account states that Michael Puckridge had previously threatened the life of his wife, described as "an interesting looking young woman." Puckridge tricked his wife into allowing herself to be tied to a plank. Afterward, "Puckridge deliberately and persistently tickled the soles of her feet with a feather. For a long time he continued to operate upon his unhappy victim who was rendered frantic by the process. Eventually, she swooned, whereupon her husband released her. It soon became too manifest that the light of reason had fled. Mrs. Puckridge was taken to the workhouse where she was placed with the other insane inmates." (page 74) The husband was given away by Mrs. Puckridge's niece who was aware of the torture and spoke to neighbors about it. The article does not say if Puckridge confessed his crime to the niece after the deed was done, or if the niece actually watched the feather relentlessly scraping away at her aunt's soles, and ultimately, her sanity
My question is, is tickling really this dangerous?
I know, among us tickle enthusiasts and among people who trust each other tickling revenge only belongs to fiction. People view it as necessary for it to be consentual or semi-consentual at the least (you know the situation where your body forces you to want to leave, but where the actual person wants to receive more).
Also, I must add that angry tickling scares the hell outta me and isn't a turn on in the least bit for me. I like vicious torturous prolonged tickling. I like situation where she loses control for a LOONG time (it's many a 'lees dream to be able to be tickled for hours and it's many a 'lers dream to have a mentally strong 'lee, yet insanely ticklish).
However, this made me also think about that non-con vid by tickleparadise in the day; it made me furious along with many over here. There is a small group of people who likes victims who hate tickling no matter how violently and respectlesly she's treated or how scared she is, but most of us are for (semi-)consentual, luckily.
I wonder if this would be possible with a willing 'lee wanting to be tortured for hours for her to lose her sanity. Was it only the woman's fear for her husband and hatred for being tickled by a person she hated or for being tickled in general, that made her traumatized?
I want opinions on this.
Last edited: