Exactly, and people never learned to question as to WHY it was bad. If you asked somebody why it (drugs) were bad, you would have been told something along the lines of 'The TV told me it was bad'.
When I asked why drugs were bad, I never got a straight answer... like people lost the ability to think for themselves had had to rely on what those cheesy anti-drug commercials would tell them
At least be honest and say 'They're bad for you, because the Government can't tax it, like they can liquor or tobacco' Hypocritial? Yes, but at least it would have been an honest answer
Some drugs can do a LOT of physiological or psychological damage if abused or even if simply used.
That said, many drugs are simply not that bad for you if used by people who thoroughly research and understand what they are putting into their bodies. People think caffeine is no big deal but ecstasy is a hard drug; but a red bull will keep me awake and hyper for 10 or 12 hours, which is much longer than ecstasy does the same (I don't consume caffeine at all, so when it happens it's a HUGE effect). The difference between legal and illegal drugs is not in the amount of harm they do; it's simply in whether or not they are legal or illegal. That's it.
The war on drugs is pretty pointless, unless your goal is to generate buttloads of money for a private prison industry and give authorities a good way of expanding their power in the name of fighting crime and create a permanent underclass. Then it's a pretty great system.
I don't encourage drugs - they are expensive, not always what you think they are, sometimes habit forming and sometimes damaging, and persistent use WILL alter the way your mind works, for better or worse - but I do think people should have the choice to use them if they so desire. And I also think that prohibition has been a pretty miserable failure in all regards.
Anyway, off my hobby horse and to answer the original question:
Ecstasy - does exactly what you think it would, which is to increase your sensitivity, sometimes dramatically. Not to encourage people to do drugs, but as a 'lee, this is pretty awesome. :lol:
Ketamine - this is an anesthetic in the real world, and so it pretty well numbs you up. Not terribly great for people who like tickling!
Pot - It's been a looooong time since I smoked, but as I recall it has a pretty hit-or-miss effect on your ticklishness, since it can leave you unable to focus on the tickling. To be honest I think that by the time I was getting tickled regularly I was past my pot-smoking days so I don't think I ever had any serious tickling while I was high.
Acid - I have done very little of this, but small amounts that leave you still rational but mildly tripping will allow you to feel the tickling at the same level of sensitivity as usual, but because you're tripping it does feel additionally excellent. Or did, anyway. ::lol:: If you're tripping a lot, though, then you are usually so far out of your head that you may not even notice you're being tickled.
That's all from the perspective of the 'lee, since that's my experience. As a 'ler, I imagine E would still be awesome (it's always sort of great) since you'd be much more involved in the moment. Pot would still be pretty useless (that may just be my anti-pot bias showing though). K would be useless for the 'ler, but if the 'lee was on K and still sensitive, it might act to render the 'lee pretty defenseless, which may appeal to a 'ler who lacked bondage equipment. Acid, well, who knows, everybody reacts differently to it.
And that's my quick drug primer for tickling.
DISCLAIMER - DRUGS ARE STILL ILLEGAL. DO NOT DO THEM. THEY ARE NOT GOOD. A HUGE FOR-PROFIT PRISON INDUSTRY EXISTS EXCLUSIVELY TO PUNISH YOU FOR DOING DRUGS. DON'T DO THEM.
I mean, you don't think they're going to put RICH drug users in prison, do you? Nah, those cells are all ours!
😉