Too many naked videos

[medikation65]

It's great that people are putting previews of their videos up, but I find there are too many tickle vieos with nudity. I don't have a problem with nudity, but personally I think it's better if the ticklee and tickler have clothes on. Also, I love nylon tickling or sock tickling, and there are fewer and fewer of those videos coming out. Just my opinion though.

 

[nessonite1]

I'm with you there...as are a lot of other people. The producers (other than TheLastLaugh) tend to turn a deaf ear on such requests as, I assume, nudity and porn makes them more money. *sigh*

 

[Hue]

I agree with Ness and medikation65, there are more and more naked videos out there, than there are of sock, nylon, and just overall 'fun' tickling. It is probably 'all about the green' but at least have videos that appeal to everyone tastes.

 

[jj82277]

paradims about what really makes money i guess. It's like why most teams just want Defnesive ends and not whole teams. I agree that there needs to be more specific tickle amterial such as socks and nylons, you can get nudity from cinimax for free, not a buck a minute. but i don't mind bikinis though, hey im a guy what can i tell you

 

[nessonite1]

Every now and then people make themselves heard on this. People consitantly ask for more, like you said, "fun" videos and so far the only person who has delivered is the LastLaugh (yeah, more free advertising for him!).
Yet we continue to hear about TC's and other's latest pornography. If I had the means I'd be producing stuff myself.

 

[TickledToDeath]

Personally I too have no problem with nudity itself HOWever, it has run amok in tickle vids. There was a time when, still feel this way but not with ALL producers, I felt that the nudity was done on purpose to take the attention away from the fact that the ticklee was NOT TICKLISH!

TTD(bwahahahahhahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa)

 

[Thanatos2]

This must be a P.O.V. problem, because I think there's not enough nudity in tickling media these days. Hopefully someday there will be enough producers creating enough content to satisfy everyone's taste.

 

[deac956611]

I have to agree with Ness and Met, there was a time when you could get a tickling video that had a litte nudity in it and lots of stockings or socks. The people were very ticklish back then. However today it appears that the more skin you show the more attention you take away from tickling. There use to be a lot of wide open mouthed. laugh out loud, gut busting laughter and today as you have noticed it is nowhere near the intensity of yester year.

 

[HOLLYWOOD]

the hollywood brother has no problem with nudity. The hollywood brother thinks the nudity is good but is not a needed thing in the video. In the ase of Magic Touch Productions videos for example, some have nudity and some don't. however although as a red blooded all american hollywood brother, the hollywood brother do love the nudity; the reality is the hollywood brother enjoy the reactions of the lee the best and the nudity is second best. The hollywood brother likes the last laugh stuff but think the tickling oculd be a little more brutal since videos are fantasy anyway. The hollywood brother thinks last laugh is pne of the few that can pull off great tickle vids without nudity but the hollywood brother will never ever comdemm and lady that wants to be naked in a tickle video for the hollywood brother or the millions and millions of the hollywood brothers fans, if you can smell what the hollywood brother is cooking!

 

[medikation65]

Well, I'm glad I'm not alone on this. I would love to see a video with tights and ticklish girls who DON'T get naked every now and again. Even just having other people hold the ticklee down is sometimes better then pure bondage. But hogtied tickling is really good. Because of these reasons, I still say that rock-man was the best of them all.

 

[maxamum_sumthin1]

i completly agree with TTD and the HOLYWOOD BROTHER 🙂 the tickling is the most important thing in a tickling vid! (hence the name) i also love the Last Laugh vids, but also i dont mind the nuidty in some of the other vids. More sock tickling would be appreciated though! 🙂 As the first 3 posts mention 🙂 also i think that what TTD said about the nuidity being there to detract from modals who arnt ticklish is true and annoying!

 

[laughingboy2000]

I like nudity because the ticklee is absolutely defenseless. There is no clothing to block tickle tools or tickling fingers, she is all skin and her body cant hide.

 

[MistressValerie1]

I'm not especially interested in nudity, perhaps because I'm not attracted to the typical "porn star" body type, either male or female. I would love more "fun" tickling videos with little nudity, and I'd love to see pleasant, but realistic-looking, models (i.e., girl- or guy-next-door).

 

[wendyandpeter]

Reality check, please?

I have to admit that just as I was about to sit down and begin my "Let's get real" diatribe, it occured to me I'd rather spend my time writing something to remind folks (and myself) that everyone's interest in tickling isn't borne of the same stuff.

There are those whose interest stems from seeing tickling as a type of affectionate play, childlike and sexual only in a very indirect way. If you are coming at it from a more childlike perspective, nudity will be unimportant for tickling for exactly the same reason that nudity is unimportant for playing spin-the-bottle or other childhood pre-sexual games. For adolescents, the kissing associated with spin-the-bottle isn't foreplay, it's the sexual act itself. You don't need to be naked to kiss, if kissing is all you're gonna be doing.

Then there are those who see it from a power-exchange-between-adults perspective, more akin to other types of bdsm play. For these folks, nudity (and bondage, etc.) is important because tickling is highly charged sexual foreplay. In a video, the naked ticklee suggests that the tickling will be followed by intercourse, and this is VERY important to the fantasy of the viewer. Most folks whose interest is of this type are absolutely UNinterested in watching people "play around at it." Call videos that appeal to these folks "porno" if you will, but that's a pretty condescending attitude.

I think that successful tickling video producers know their market pretty well, and I'm guessing that the reason we see the percentage of clothed to naked tickling we do is because that's what sells most. Just like why we see sock/nylon videos in the relatively small numbers we do -- that interest is a relatively small niche of the market. I have a hard time complaining about anything much -- I remember when there was almost nothing available for the tickling fetish market at all. Compared to 20 years ago, what's available today is pretty remarkable.

 

[-Kunoke-]

Well, I can't say I don't enjoy a bit of nudity from time to time....BUT, I have noticed it gets out of hand a lot lately. I'd like to see more tickling, and real tickling at that. The playful stuff is GREAT, not my favorite, but I still like it a lot. Sock removal is great too 🙂

But yeah, I agree, there needs to be a little less sexual material. I realize some people like it that way, and it's cool, just remember not EVERYONE is only looking for that.

 

[maxamum_sumthin1]

yes, Kunoke is right. 🙂 every one is different and like tickling in different ways and for differenet reason, but i spose the vid companies are jsut that: companies. and threfor have to appeal to as wider market as possible. Unfortunatly

 

[wendyandpeter]

Problems with ...nudity???

There's plenty of all kinds of material to go around. Let's not whine about nudity... Jesus. I have to admit I'm really shocked that people who post to a sexual fetish site are grossed out by ...nudity... of all things. That just doesn't even make the first BIT of sense.

 

[nessonite1]

It actually makes perfect sense. Nudity isnt the be-all end-all of human sexuality. In fact it's even more likely for someone with a sexual "abnormality" like a fetish to NOT need or even desire to see nudity. Some people are just not all that turned on by the sight of another person with no clothes on. It may not seem possibly to someone who IS turned on by that but it's no more strange than someone else to not be turned on by tickling when you, I, or anyone else IS.

 

[eyepopinfeather]

Seriously Folks...

Yep, I'm with Wendy and Pete. Tickling and nudity go hand-in-hand! I'm also of the camp that: tickling is sexual! I could never figure out people who thought otherwise... Yea, I get excited at a helpless girl (clothed) getting a good feet-tickling; but all the better if she's naked. When one is naked, they are simply more vulnerable, and it adds to the excitement.

Clothed or not, I also like good-for-real laughing in a vidio—you know, like the kind when you do it in real life :happy:; I can't stand a non-ticklish "actor" smiling and giggling.

How can you sexually resist a bound, nude woman with her hands tied high above her head truely struggling benieth a roving, spiraling Q-Tip; or a formidible, starving feather? — You can't.

 

[wendyandpeter]

Let's do realize what it is we're doing here ...

I'm not claiming that nudity is the end-all of human sexuality. However, I think it would be pretty difficult to argue that the two are not inextricably linked. After all, I think people usually have sex naked. It's a pretty common adult connection. I'm not sure I want to go down the road of analysis too far on this one -- but I'll say this much. Fetishism is about sexual substitutions of one type or another, that much is fact. And I know that for some of us, nudity and sex are intimidating concepts, while tickling is comforting and regressively safe. Tickling thus becomes a substitute (or at least a "comfort" activity while intercourse remains an uncomfortable one). Those of us in that boat may have positive pre-sexual associations with tickling while having negative associations with their own nudity and sexual experiences. This state of things may lead them to being uncomfortable with all nudity and overtly sexual images, since these images remind them of their own uncomfortable feelings about their sexual selves.

All I was pointing out earlier is that those who are coming at it from that perspective should understand that referring to tickling videos that contain adult imagery as "pornography" (in that pious, pajorative tone) makes one come off as immature and prudish, particularly in the context of a website dedicated to providing a home base for people with a sexual fetish.

It's probably worth mentioning that this website couldn't continue to exist without the support of people who enjoy what TC videos, et al, do. To that extent, their productions aren't "unfortunate" at all. Quite the contrary.

 

[nessonite1]

Certainly...Preferring nudity is perfectly valid. But so is prefering no nudity. Many people, like me, prefer to leave things to the imagination and find the human body more erotic when all is not revealed. I'm sure the reason producers generally include nudity is that most people DO prefer it...either that or it is a very vocal minority. The market consists mainly of men and, let's face it, men like porn. Men like nudity. Men, apparently, enjoy women vs. vibrator videos.
There IS a market for non-nude tickling videos...even non-bondage. Both markets are wide open as nobody (save LastLaugh) is really in there making it. I think the f/m market could use a serious jumpstart as well but that's another subject entirely.

 

[MistressValerie1]

... I think the f/m market could use a serious jumpstart as well but that's another subject entirely.

I agree! Last Laugh happens to be my favourite video producer, precisely because they feature playful, non-nude tickling with wholesome "girl next door" actresses. I would love to see them branch out into playful F/M and FF/M following the same formula, featuring non-porn-actor "guy next door" 'lees 😉

 

[ladybird27]

Ok, here's another piece of this. Is what people seem to object to nude tickling, or pornography, and who draws that line?

For example, I don't find nude tickling offensive. However, I do sometimes become uncomfortable when viewing clips of clit or breast tickling, because my interest in tickling is more "innocently sexual" if that makes any sense. For me, that is the line between tickling and porn, but I know that that's a personal line. Others may not see it that way. Some people feel that nudity automatically equates to porn, and still others feel that all tickling media is porn because it is designed toward sexual ends. Let's try to be understanding of the fact that not everyone thinks the same way, and leave room for a little "to each his own".

Now, as for the sudden explosion of vibrater clips...that as far as I'm concerned is definitely porn. I really, really would appreciate it if tickling vid producers would do what Tc started out doing and now seems to have abandoned--that is, separate their hj and vib clips from their tickling clips. I'm not denying people's right to watch that kind of material, mixed with tickling or otherwise, but I don't want to see it when I go to a tickling website. However, no one's forcing me to buy it. No one's forcing me to watch it. Tc still makes a lot of high quality non-nude, non-vibrator clips. As does Tickled2death. I complain about what I perceive as porn on tickling sites too. Don't get me wrong. But guys--if you don't want to watch that sort of media--it's clearly marked, don't buy it. And if you don't want to have to wade through it, there are still sites that separate that material--patronize them. The others will get the message.

A little bit sick of people whining,
Ladybird

 

[nessonite1]

That's a good question, ladybird. I don't object to nudity or even porn. I don't like it and I don't watch it but I wouldn't for a moment tell people that their preferences are somehow wrong or invalid.
One thing that should have occured to me to say before what that the main thing I dislike about nudity in tickling videos is that it lacks any sort of subtlety. It's like the difference between reading a book and watching a movie. One way you get to insert any amount of sexuality/eroticism that you like and the other is shoving it in your face screaming "THIS is sexual...THIS is SEX SEX SEX SEX SEX. Look...BOOBS!!! Look...ASS!!! Look...GENITALS!!!"
There isn't anything subtle about that.
Not all nudity is automatically "porn" but I think the majority of it here is. I have seen a few very tasteful videos that included nudity in a non-porn way.
My 2 cents. though I think Ive added almost a dime by now.

 

[andymac1]

Well, I don't mind either. It depends on what mood i'm in or how the 'lee' looks.

I know my recent posts have been shots of my 'lee' nude, but hey...how often do i get an offer to tickle a nude femlee? Not turnin' that down in a hurry! LOL

Don't get me wrong... not a nylon fan but bare feet in jeans is nice!