• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

What exactly is the appeal of naked tickling?

LoveTickleGirl

Registered User
Joined
Jun 19, 2016
Messages
6
Points
3
Only talking about a young, attractive lady getting tickled by one or multiple ticklers. I generally have no problem against it, but I have a hard time to think about even a single time when the ticklee being naked adds any additional appeal to me. Like, it is totally bland and makes no difference to me.

Trying to understand the appeal here.
 
I think for many (me included) it's the same reason many like less clothing rather than more clothing for other sexual activities: the body is beautiful and nice to admire. That's a good compliment to tickling when there is an intended sexual charge to the experience, much like pairing the right wine with a good steak. Both can be good on their own, but some appreciate them together as compliments to each other. Others don't like the taste of one or the other, so naturally avoid doing that.

Tickling is not always sexual for me, or it can be partially sexualized. Whether being sexualized at all, or fully, having more access to more areas does make tickling more fun for me, and often seems to leave the lee feeling more vulnerable and ticklish. At this point, I only do very sexualized tickling with my wife, so tickling while naked is added fun. But when we have a session with someone else, it's either lightly sexually charged, or not at all, but no full nakedness or focus on sexual touch. It just depends upon how the person we're playing with feels.

An example of a sexually charged, but not fully sexualized experience for us: A woman we played with had extremely ticklish nipples. She and my wife went topless because they both felt comfortable doing so. They both felt more ticklish in the session, and it did make it feel more adventurous and sexually charged, without feeling like anything crossed someone's boundaries, which were all discussed thoroughly up front.

An example of a much less sexually charged experience would be how I love to tickle a girl when she's wearing a sweater. I don't know exactly why, but I guess there's just something about how the material and coverage leads them to feel more secure, and being able to tickle them anyway and feeling them squirm around in it and hearing the wonderful sound of laughter is just sweet fun! Speaking of sweaters and related things, I just wrote a small article where I was processing loosely related thoughts, which may interest you or someone else: Article link.

I guess I appreciate different elements and compliments to tickling as unique additions to the total experience. Clothing (or lack thereof), scene, ambiance, age, temperature, bondage, personality...everything.

Hope that helps in some way!
 
as long as the main ticklish spots are absolutely completely exposed thats enough imho
 
Only talking about a young, attractive lady getting tickled by one or multiple ticklers. I generally have no problem against it, but I have a hard time to think about even a single time when the ticklee being naked adds any additional appeal to me. Like, it is totally bland and makes no difference to me.

Trying to understand the appeal here.

I'm going to take a wild stab and guess that, based on your username, you're a straight woman. Therefore, seeing other women naked holds about as much appeal to you as a dude's schlong flapping in the face of a straight man. IE, slim to none, and Slim left town.

I mean, I think most of us can appreciate someone of the same sex being attractive, but odds are it doesn't get our motors running the same as it would for a gay or bi person, and that's pretty normal, if you ask me.

I do occasionally marvel at how often I see people ask this question online, though. Like, sexual attraction is one of the most basic, fundamental aspects of human existence and a lot of people approach it like it's some new species of bug they've never heard of before.
 
Nudity often times sells more than non-nudity because, well, nudity. As a consumer of content, I don't look for nude tickling unless I want to see vagina or breast tickling. Rarely does the ticklee being nude add anything for me unless those specific areas mentioned are tickled.
 
I'm going to take a wild stab and guess that, based on your username, you're a straight woman. Therefore, seeing other women naked holds about as much appeal to you as a dude's schlong flapping in the face of a straight man. IE, slim to none, and Slim left town.

I mean, I think most of us can appreciate someone of the same sex being attractive, but odds are it doesn't get our motors running the same as it would for a gay or bi person, and that's pretty normal, if you ask me.

I do occasionally marvel at how often I see people ask this question online, though. Like, sexual attraction is one of the most basic, fundamental aspects of human existence and a lot of people approach it like it's some new species of bug they've never heard of before.
Actually a straight man, through and through. Of course seeing a naked, young, attractive woman is will "stir reactions" in me, but it is what it is. But for tickling? I barely feel any difference between women fully dressed, in bra and panties, topless, or fully naked.

I can feel her naked body to be attractive, but for the tickling session itself? It literally brings absolutely no difference to me.
 
I'm going to take a wild stab and guess that, based on your username, you're a straight woman. Therefore, seeing other women naked holds about as much appeal to you as a dude's schlong flapping in the face of a straight man. IE, slim to none, and Slim left town.

I mean, I think most of us can appreciate someone of the same sex being attractive, but odds are it doesn't get our motors running the same as it would for a gay or bi person, and that's pretty normal, if you ask me.

I do occasionally marvel at how often I see people ask this question online, though. Like, sexual attraction is one of the most basic, fundamental aspects of human existence and a lot of people approach it like it's some new species of bug they've never heard of before.
Let me give one example though.

I may order a custom video letting a naked 19/20-year-old girl be tickled by 4 skilled male ticklers aged 55-65 years old. But it is a very specific example of me looking for some very specific scene.

Nudity makes no difference to me in the vast majority of the tickling scenes.

On bondage, however, it makes a hell of difference, though women being in bondage while dressed topless, in bra and panties, or fully clothes all have other appeals.
 
I like when the tickle is fully dressed and her barefeet are locked in the stocks.I love the contrast between barefeet and fully dressed body
 
Only talking about a young, attractive lady getting tickled by one or multiple ticklers. I generally have no problem against it, but I have a hard time to think about even a single time when the ticklee being naked adds any additional appeal to me. Like, it is totally bland and makes no difference to me.

Trying to understand the appeal here.
Is this a serious question? Who doesn't like naked women? I mean a like sexy outfits too and also barefoot and in jeans is sexy but yea I'll take boobs over a cardigan sweater anyday.
 
For me tickling is the perfect form of sexual domination and nudity is a big part of it. The ticklee should feel exposed and vulnerable, unable to cover her private areas. So while full nudity is not a requirement, toplessness, bottomlessness (a favorite) or see-through/skimpy clothing add a lot to the scene. Moreover, I feel that the exposure ought to be one-sided for the scene to feel natural. My favorite videos all feature ticklers wearing sexy lingerie and ticklees who are helplessly naked. I also feel the areas of the woman's body she is expected to hide are some of the most devastating tickle targets: nipples, ass and upper-inner thighs.
 
As someone who does not consider tickling to be a sexual experience, and now rejects the connotation of fetish in relation to it, I too would say that I find that nudity makes no difference also. At a deeper level, nakedness is natural, and being naked does not actually equal sex, as we are programmed to accept. Clothing is a construct, that we are forced to participate, for some genuinely reasonable purpose, but more significantly by it being rigidly considered as some sexual wrong, based on some peoples personal views which are adopted and programmed into us by the acting powers of society.

As someone who appreciates the subject of tickling for its aesthetics / beauty, there are instances were clothing simply is a addition with no point other than to conform to what we are ordered, and by doing so it removes a part of that aesthetic beauty.

From a very basic level, in terms of tickling, less clothing may equal more areas available to tickle
 
Being tickled naked with with my partner is so much fun. It makes you feel free, exposed and vulnerable. It feels amazing
 
Trying to understand the appeal here.


Tiddies.

😛

But is all seriousness, I think this is one of those things were if you don't see the appeal, then really, not a whole lot can be said. It just doesn't appeal to you, and that's cool.
 
Door 44 Productions
What's New

11/7/2024
Visit the TMF Chatroom! Always something up!
Tickle Experiment
Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** Jojo45 ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Back
Top