What exactly is the appeal of naked tickling?

[LoveTickleGirl]

Only talking about a young, attractive lady getting tickled by one or multiple ticklers. I generally have no problem against it, but I have a hard time to think about even a single time when the ticklee being naked adds any additional appeal to me. Like, it is totally bland and makes no difference to me.

Trying to understand the appeal here.

 

[WickedTouch]

I think for many (me included) it's the same reason many like less clothing rather than more clothing for other sexual activities: the body is beautiful and nice to admire. That's a good compliment to tickling when there is an intended sexual charge to the experience, much like pairing the right wine with a good steak. Both can be good on their own, but some appreciate them together as compliments to each other. Others don't like the taste of one or the other, so naturally avoid doing that.

Tickling is not always sexual for me, or it can be partially sexualized. Whether being sexualized at all, or fully, having more access to more areas does make tickling more fun for me, and often seems to leave the lee feeling more vulnerable and ticklish. At this point, I only do very sexualized tickling with my wife, so tickling while naked is added fun. But when we have a session with someone else, it's either lightly sexually charged, or not at all, but no full nakedness or focus on sexual touch. It just depends upon how the person we're playing with feels.

An example of a sexually charged, but not fully sexualized experience for us: A woman we played with had extremely ticklish nipples. She and my wife went topless because they both felt comfortable doing so. They both felt more ticklish in the session, and it did make it feel more adventurous and sexually charged, without feeling like anything crossed someone's boundaries, which were all discussed thoroughly up front.

An example of a much less sexually charged experience would be how I love to tickle a girl when she's wearing a sweater. I don't know exactly why, but I guess there's just something about how the material and coverage leads them to feel more secure, and being able to tickle them anyway and feeling them squirm around in it and hearing the wonderful sound of laughter is just sweet fun! Speaking of sweaters and related things, I just wrote a small article where I was processing loosely related thoughts, which may interest you or someone else: Article link.

I guess I appreciate different elements and compliments to tickling as unique additions to the total experience. Clothing (or lack thereof), scene, ambiance, age, temperature, bondage, personality...everything.

Hope that helps in some way!

 

[natscott6282]

as long as the main ticklish spots are absolutely completely exposed thats enough imho

 

[SoleMates]

Only talking about a young, attractive lady getting tickled by one or multiple ticklers. I generally have no problem against it, but I have a hard time to think about even a single time when the ticklee being naked adds any additional appeal to me. Like, it is totally bland and makes no difference to me.

Trying to understand the appeal here.

I'm going to take a wild stab and guess that, based on your username, you're a straight woman. Therefore, seeing other women naked holds about as much appeal to you as a dude's schlong flapping in the face of a straight man. IE, slim to none, and Slim left town.

I mean, I think most of us can appreciate someone of the same sex being attractive, but odds are it doesn't get our motors running the same as it would for a gay or bi person, and that's pretty normal, if you ask me.

I do occasionally marvel at how often I see people ask this question online, though. Like, sexual attraction is one of the most basic, fundamental aspects of human existence and a lot of people approach it like it's some new species of bug they've never heard of before.

 

[Soles_Scream]

Nudity often times sells more than non-nudity because, well, nudity. As a consumer of content, I don't look for nude tickling unless I want to see vagina or breast tickling. Rarely does the ticklee being nude add anything for me unless those specific areas mentioned are tickled.

 

[LoveTickleGirl]

I'm going to take a wild stab and guess that, based on your username, you're a straight woman. Therefore, seeing other women naked holds about as much appeal to you as a dude's schlong flapping in the face of a straight man. IE, slim to none, and Slim left town.

I mean, I think most of us can appreciate someone of the same sex being attractive, but odds are it doesn't get our motors running the same as it would for a gay or bi person, and that's pretty normal, if you ask me.

I do occasionally marvel at how often I see people ask this question online, though. Like, sexual attraction is one of the most basic, fundamental aspects of human existence and a lot of people approach it like it's some new species of bug they've never heard of before.

Actually a straight man, through and through. Of course seeing a naked, young, attractive woman is will "stir reactions" in me, but it is what it is. But for tickling? I barely feel any difference between women fully dressed, in bra and panties, topless, or fully naked.

I can feel her naked body to be attractive, but for the tickling session itself? It literally brings absolutely no difference to me.

 

[LoveTickleGirl]

I'm going to take a wild stab and guess that, based on your username, you're a straight woman. Therefore, seeing other women naked holds about as much appeal to you as a dude's schlong flapping in the face of a straight man. IE, slim to none, and Slim left town.

I mean, I think most of us can appreciate someone of the same sex being attractive, but odds are it doesn't get our motors running the same as it would for a gay or bi person, and that's pretty normal, if you ask me.

I do occasionally marvel at how often I see people ask this question online, though. Like, sexual attraction is one of the most basic, fundamental aspects of human existence and a lot of people approach it like it's some new species of bug they've never heard of before.

Let me give one example though.

I may order a custom video letting a naked 19/20-year-old girl be tickled by 4 skilled male ticklers aged 55-65 years old. But it is a very specific example of me looking for some very specific scene.

Nudity makes no difference to me in the vast majority of the tickling scenes.

On bondage, however, it makes a hell of difference, though women being in bondage while dressed topless, in bra and panties, or fully clothes all have other appeals.

 

[vackor58]

I like when the tickle is fully dressed and her barefeet are locked in the stocks.I love the contrast between barefeet and fully dressed body

 

[thor33]

Only talking about a young, attractive lady getting tickled by one or multiple ticklers. I generally have no problem against it, but I have a hard time to think about even a single time when the ticklee being naked adds any additional appeal to me. Like, it is totally bland and makes no difference to me.

Trying to understand the appeal here.

Is this a serious question? Who doesn't like naked women? I mean a like sexy outfits too and also barefoot and in jeans is sexy but yea I'll take boobs over a cardigan sweater anyday.

 

[dreamr]

For me tickling is the perfect form of sexual domination and nudity is a big part of it. The ticklee should feel exposed and vulnerable, unable to cover her private areas. So while full nudity is not a requirement, toplessness, bottomlessness (a favorite) or see-through/skimpy clothing add a lot to the scene. Moreover, I feel that the exposure ought to be one-sided for the scene to feel natural. My favorite videos all feature ticklers wearing sexy lingerie and ticklees who are helplessly naked. I also feel the areas of the woman's body she is expected to hide are some of the most devastating tickle targets: nipples, ass and upper-inner thighs.

 

[hefophre]

As someone who does not consider tickling to be a sexual experience, and now rejects the connotation of fetish in relation to it, I too would say that I find that nudity makes no difference also. At a deeper level, nakedness is natural, and being naked does not actually equal sex, as we are programmed to accept. Clothing is a construct, that we are forced to participate, for some genuinely reasonable purpose, but more significantly by it being rigidly considered as some sexual wrong, based on some peoples personal views which are adopted and programmed into us by the acting powers of society.

As someone who appreciates the subject of tickling for its aesthetics / beauty, there are instances were clothing simply is a addition with no point other than to conform to what we are ordered, and by doing so it removes a part of that aesthetic beauty.

From a very basic level, in terms of tickling, less clothing may equal more areas available to tickle

 

[redheadlady]

Being tickled naked with with my partner is so much fun. It makes you feel free, exposed and vulnerable. It feels amazing

 

[Cosmo_ac]

Trying to understand the appeal here.

Tiddies.

😛

But is all seriousness, I think this is one of those things were if you don't see the appeal, then really, not a whole lot can be said. It just doesn't appeal to you, and that's cool.

 

[lostphilosopher]

Different strokes for different folks.

 

[ticklishfan85]

Love having all the spots exposed! That's a turn on!

 

[hefophre]

It depends on the setting because for me it is not to do with sexuality, but is about aesthetic. I enjoy tickling for tickling and its aesthetic is one of those things I like. I do not consider it sexual and disavow "fetish" as it is commonly (I think incorrectly ) used. Nakedness having to being considered sexual or bad is dumb and is constructed. Because aesthetic is important it is situational and depends what fits. If situation works with naked, why not be naked? In situation works with clothes, why not be clothed? If situation does not make sense for naked, then why be? The same as I do not care to see wooden stock on hotel bed, or the person having no clothes while having some out of place shoe (like a stripper-high-heel) still on, or wear a costume in a messy living room, it does not look nice aesthetically.

 

[FFT32]

Aside from the straightforward and obvious "all areas exposed" reason, enjoying the full beauty of a sexy lee while tickling is nice.

 

[Sunriseticklee]

It totally depends on whom....

I can take it or leave it. My focus is more on the ler's hands and how skilled they are in making the lee react, anyway.

But my favorite sensation is skin on skin... And in a well negotiated scene with someone I really trust or enjoy playing with.... Everything kinda just comes off. I dig it.... I just like being naked anyway as a choice. But I don't offer it... all the time. If you're killing it as the tickler, I may ask you if I can take more clothes off. Take it as a badge of honor and enjoy.

😉

 

[hopefulscrambl]

Apparently, some people are into genitals.

Weirdos.

 

[Inticklergator]

Why are nice things nice? Interesting question but I think we’ll need Aristotle or someone like that to have even a chance of answering it.

 

[soletease]

I am a male and generally a ler. I would say, for me, the amount of clothing the lee wants to wear is really personal preference. I am not a producer and make videos. I am into tickling as a social activity and have sessions with friends and newcommers.

I have had a good mix of tickle partners over the years. I'd say its all about the comfort of the lee.

One session, a female wanted an orgasm after being brutally tickled. She wanted to keep her top on the entire session but for the tickling/orgasm she was fine with no underwear. She wanted to feel that whole "being exposed" and having her vagina touched/pleased to orgasm. She was fully strapped down in an X position to a padded table and she was wearing a bra and summer tank top that covered right above her belly button after she was stretched out. She received a brutal tickling on bare feet/ armpits/ hips and inner thighs. Then we followed up with clit stimulation that ended in orgasm and finished with deep hip bone tickling. Her vagina was bare the entire session. She loved it.

One session the lee was a male. He wanted to be nude to feel "helpless". Genitals were not part of the tickling / never touched but he enjoyed his time as a naked lee in full restraints on the table.

I've had multiple sessions where the lee is female and wants breasts tickled. Breast/nipple/areola tickling is administered on bare breasts so the lees take their tops/bras off and do the session with bare chests.

As far as clothing goes, if the session is geared more hard core tickle torture, the only real rule is both feet are completely bare for foot tickling.
That goes for veteran lees and newbies. If foot tickling is part of the session, then feet should be bare. That's actually the majority of the lees preference, believe it or not.

 

[BBGuy5240]

Some men like seeing breasts and vag. Some women like seeing cock and balls. They also may want the lee flipped over because they like seeing butt. Everyone likes different things.

Nude tickling has never been my thing at all. It just never appealed to me. I don't even like see-through clothing that much when it comes to tickling, unless it's just the belly area that's see-through.