Liking to think of myself as a strong Christian (or I guess as strong of one as you can be if you're also a member here :stickout), and have similar feelings as Bombers in regards to having a "fetish".
When I first came on here a large portion of my brain was rambling on and on and berating me about how, by even being affiliated with an 'adult' site like this in any aspect is a major sin. But, as I continued coming here, and growing older (and more mature) I've come to realize that, like Bombers already said, there is nothing innately wrong with what society has labeled as a 'fetish', here. I just really dislike the connotation connected with that word (fetish), so I generally like to say I have a strong inclination in tickling. :blush
Heck, you could look at it the other way, too. It's not only 'natural' but largely encouraged by society for males to have a MAJOR boob fetish (and an increasingly large portion have a 'bimbo' fetish), and there's nothing wrong with that, is there? - Okay, society says there's nothing wrong with that, but, since when does society have everything perfect - or even tolerable, sometimes?
I don't think that God would be disappointed if we identified ourselves as having this "fetish". Everyone has a fetish - it gets us 'going' and is integral for us to be able to procreate, which the Lord commanded us to do himself: go forth and multiply. (If no one's 'turned on' then sex is pretty far out of the question, and regardless of what society says about it, you're only 'unique' in having different tastes than the vast majority.) Society's attributed such a strongly negative connotation with the word 'fetish' that whenever people hear that they have a mental shudder and aversion from being attributed with it, though this usually isn't true.
People are different, and I think this is different, so, that's just it: it's another way to 'uniquely' express who you are. It's not bad unless you warp it and take it too far (making it an idol, putting it above your faith in God).
And, as this was brought up, I feel I have the 'right' to give my two cents on the situation involving mainly hazelf and Purple. As a Christian (as best as I can be - most of the time :stickout) I feel that what you are stating, hazel is a complete contradiction. It's an oxymoron, in a sense, to say that you are an open-minded and thus indecisive Christian. Though there is the capacity for someone to be both open-minded 'and' indecisive about things, I do not find that that open-mindedness and indecision can correlate on any 'one' given topic; they just do not fit together in the same context!
Being open-minded is aware, yet indecision is closer to being confused. If you're open-minded you're capable of hearing everyone's story/opinion and weighing the strength (or fragility) of those comments and being able to come up with an educated, analytical decision. Now, indecsion is the exact [o]opposite[/o] of that, it's more synonymous with 'close-minded' than it's opposite, open-minded.
And being a Christian, yes it is not a proven science, but that's why it's called RELIGION! You have to have faith in something, if you feel that that the world is bigger than yourself. And from that belief you iinterpret signs as seeing 'proof' of your belief in religion, which Christianity encourages you to do: to go out and learn more and ask questions about things you don't know, so you can become more educated and hopefully 'enlightened' in your walk with God.
It's more than a name and a one-way relationship...
Religion is not a piggy-bank, for you to constantly take money from without giving anything back when you're 'okay'. Christianity is a relationship, and if you want to be in it, you'll have to stick with it through the bad and good times! If not, I think you'd be closer to a 'nominal' Christian, who only calls themself a Christian but has no personal relationship with Jesus which defines Christianity's religion/relationship!