Ai image megathread

[dmb41]

More AI fun...

 

[U.N.Owen]

I try to use AI to envision scenarios that could never happen in real life.

Those certainly qualify.

(I also assume they're not from Ideogram, since despite its many plusses Ideogram has absolutely no idea what stocks are.)

 

[U.N.Owen]

Ideogram still can't figure out nylon feet in closeup, but I've gotten a couple of almost successful images with socks (it still tends to overdefine the toes under the socks).

 

[NHTickler41M]

God, I wish you or someone could figure out nylons 🙂

 

[U.N.Owen]

My guess is that there are AI generators that can manage nylons in closeup (Ideogram can manage them from a distance, at least sometimes)... but those generators undoubtedly have other weaknesses Ideogram doesn't have. (So far Ideogram is the only one I've tried that actually creates images that even come close to resembling my prompts.)

 

[U.N.Owen]

So it turns out Ideogram does know what tickling is... it just resists acting on it.

I reuploaded the picture below (a steampunk version of my Terrible Tickler villainess, if you like that sort of image) to upscale it... since even though Ideogram had just made the effing thing it gave me the fricking "maybe not safe cat" every time I tried to upscale the same image it had just produced itself. But uploading it as a fresh image got past that - and I noticed that the prompt/description it auto-generated said the girl "is seated on a metal bench, her feet tickled by two feathered devices attached to the bench."

So it can figure out that that's tickling. But, if you use that same line in your own prompt, you get random feathers sprouting all over the place and no contact with the girl's feet.

That seems to confirm that the AI generators are programmed to avoid any contact they consider "intimate," which is why you have to struggle so much to get it to show contact with careful description of what you want (which still usually doesn't work).

EDIT: Exactly the same thing happened with a second version of the scene (including that it wouldn't upscale the image it itself had just made until I reuploaded it). The auto-generated description says that the woman "seated on a metal platform, appears to be laughing heartily with her feet tickled. The seated woman's feet are bound with white feathers, and there are devices attached to them that seem to be causing the tickling."

 

[Kyle 1989]

For U.N. Owen - I took a shot at animating your dragon scene to see if it would produce actual tickling contact and it did! took about 40 pulls to get these 5 and they are not perfect but pretty darn close! I also tried recreating the scene and animating it again and got a few with actual tickling as well...always hit or miss with Ideogram, but its still the best for getting it "close" and taking it from there....Hailuo and Kling are still the best for animating ive found...im wondering if ideogram will be jumping on the animation bandwagon soon....

 

[Kyle 1989]

the remixes....

 

[U.N.Owen]

the remixes....

Wow! Those are all amazing! Many thanks for your efforts!

The 3rd and 4th animations are particularly impressive, with just the right kind of contact around the toes and a great reaction from the 'victim.'

And one more thing I can say for certain: I want to track down the effing Ideogram "maybe not safe" cat and wipe that smug look off its fat face. Contact with a woman's foot is not frigging porn.

 

[Kyle 1989]

You've caught a Leprechaun and she must give you her gold, thems the rules, but you propose a bargain that is mutually beneficial to both of you...she can keep her gold if she spends this St. Patricks Day fulfilling your tickling fetish desires, and she gladly accepts...

 

[U.N.Owen]

Do we really know what was in Pandora's Box?

(It was actually a jar. "Box" is a later translation error.)

 

[cdnticklr]

Excellent! Thanks!!

 

[RobertWalton]

Here are a few I put together.

 

[NHTickler41M]

What program did you use?

 

[CJTickler]

dont' mind me, just f'ing around

 

[CJTickler]

random stuff

 

[Yanks129]

random stuff

Amazing

 

[U.N.Owen]

With mischievous dryads about, don't wander away from the tour group.

(Or maybe do, since it could be a lot of fun.)

 

[RobertWalton]

What program did you use?

Piclumen.com

 

[NHTickler41M]

I've been inspired to try AI and would love to hear people's thoughts of the work and any suggestions they have.

 

[NHTickler41M]

More of my AI

 

[U.N.Owen]

Not bad at all. And pretty decent nylon results (though that likely won't hold up if the image gets any closer to the feet).

Is this with Ideogram?

 

[NHTickler41M]

Yes it is.

 

[U.N.Owen]

What's your account name there? I'll follow you.

 

[U.N.Owen]

What's your account name there? I'll follow you.

Unless you're scholardrb41... in which case, I already followed you yesterday!