Ai image megathread

[NHTickler41M]

Unless you're scholardrb41... in which case, I already followed you yesterday!

That is me!

 

[odzadoro]

tortured in space, part whatever

 

[RobertWalton]

here's a fun one I whipped up.

 

[RobertWalton]

Here are a few more which demonstrate some some AI weirdness but I believe it to be forgivable. as you can see, I like upper body. made with piclumen.com. Doesn't censor a lot.

 

[RobertWalton]

some more.

 

[Kyle 1989]

Had a watcher request over on my D.A. page for Abigail from the game Stardew Valley...never heard of it, but here she is in 5 short videos tickled in stocks by feathers, fingers and even a goat!

 

[Kyle 1989]

Barefoot Tickle teasing from She Hulk on St. Patrick's Day, mix of styles...

 

[Kyle 1989]

Tickle Time with She Hulk and Batgirl, mix of styles...

 

[Kyle 1989]

Batgirl Tickling 1960s Eartha Kitt era Catwoman.....

 

[U.N.Owen]

Ideogram has just introduced a new rendering model. It's sharper and higher definition... but also seems to understand some prompts less well than the previous version (which is also still available - you can choose either, and the new one uses more credits).

BUT, it seems the new model MIGHT at least sometimes understand what tickling is. I've tried some prompts specifying someone tickling someone else and have gotten some better results than before. (It still doesn't know what stocks are, and it still can't seem to handle nylons in closeup.)

 

[U.N.Owen]

Ideogram has just introduced a new rendering model. It's sharper and higher definition... but also seems to understand some prompts less well than the previous version (which is also still available - you can choose either, and the new one uses more credits).

BUT, it seems the new model MIGHT at least sometimes understand what tickling is. I've tried some prompts specifying someone tickling someone else and have gotten some better results than before. (It still doesn't know what stocks are, and it still can't seem to handle nylons in closeup.)

Emphasis on "sometimes."

 

[Kyle 1989]

Ideogram has just introduced a new rendering model. It's sharper and higher definition... but also seems to understand some prompts less well than the previous version (which is also still available - you can choose either, and the new one uses more credits).

BUT, it seems the new model MIGHT at least sometimes understand what tickling is. I've tried some prompts specifying someone tickling someone else and have gotten some better results than before. (It still doesn't know what stocks are, and it still can't seem to handle nylons in closeup.)

I noticed this and played around with it yesterday. I seem to remember this when 2.0 came out, it looked much flashier but seemed to get the prompts confused more, however this smoothed itself out considerably over the following days and weeks. I have a feeling 3.0 will "learn" rather quickly and will be a much different animal in a week or two.... the stocks thing is infuriating, even when basing your work off of a sample pic it just does not get the concept of stocks...the nylons thing as well, ive gotten some anime style stuff that has done nylons fairly well but the rest of the styles cant seem to pull it off...

 

[U.N.Owen]

I noticed this and played around with it yesterday. I seem to remember this when 2.0 came out, it looked much flashier but seemed to get the prompts confused more, however this smoothed itself out considerably over the following days and weeks. I have a feeling 3.0 will "learn" rather quickly and will be a much different animal in a week or two.... the stocks thing is infuriating, even when basing your work off of a sample pic it just does not get the concept of stocks...the nylons thing as well, ive gotten some anime style stuff that has done nylons fairly well but the rest of the styles cant seem to pull it off...

The AI does actually "know" what stocks are... if you upload a picture with stocks, the auto-description will sometimes refer to stocks. But it won't generate an image with stocks, even based on a source image that already has them, as you said.

I have no clue why that's the case. It's possible it's programmed not to, for some reason. Likewise the AI knows what tickling is... I've had auto-descriptions of uploaded images say "her feet are being tickled." But if you put "her feet are being tickled" in a prompt, it rarely generates that. I did get a few successes with that yesterday with 3.0, but it seems like it became less common even just in the first few hours of the new model.

 

[TKLR42]

Well alrighty then! Good stuff!

 

[love feet]

tortured in space, part whatever

I love the robot/Android

 

[HystericalHysterical]

Wan 2.1, image to video is pretty great

 

[RobbinAlias]

The AI does actually "know" what stocks are... if you upload a picture with stocks, the auto-description will sometimes refer to stocks. But it won't generate an image with stocks, even based on a source image that already has them, as you said.

I have no clue why that's the case. It's possible it's programmed not to, for some reason. Likewise the AI knows what tickling is... I've had auto-descriptions of uploaded images say "her feet are being tickled." But if you put "her feet are being tickled" in a prompt, it rarely generates that. I did get a few successes with that yesterday with 3.0, but it seems like it became less common even just in the first few hours of the new model.

I somehow got chatgpt.com to create these. But I did so by each time modifying the prompt slightly

 

[U.N.Owen]

I somehow got chatgpt.com to create these. But I did so by each time modifying the prompt slightly

Well, it's progress!

Ideogram won't even do that, for now... though like I said, it does "know" what stocks are given the auto-generated description it gave when I uploaded a Canelli image.

 

[U.N.Owen]

Wan 2.1, image to video is pretty great

That is pretty impressive... though the site is pricey.

 

[d75tkj]

As far as stocks, I've had luck by simply being as descriptive as possible. For example: foot stockade pillory made of wood with two circular tight ankle holes, frame is rectangular and perpendicular to ground, woman sitting in chair behind frame with outstretched legs with bare feet through the ankle holes, soles showing.

Then, so it doesn't just give me a sort of wooden ankle cuffs device, I'll add: the rest of the front of the stockade is made of solid wood.

Do this for every element you think is important. Here's a great video on effective language https://www.youtube.com/watch?v= Od3FRMLqwFk (remove space). For example, use the word "extremely" if you want something extremely detailed, or use "beautiful" to fix deformities. Not mentioned in the video, but my personal favorites that I use frequently are "well-proportioned" and "anatomically correct" for all human characters. But be efficient, so instead of putting that behind every body part, I just say "every aspect of her body is..." etc.

 

[U.N.Owen]

As far as stocks, I've had luck by simply being as descriptive as possible. For example: foot stockade pillory made of wood with two circular tight ankle holes, frame is rectangular and perpendicular to ground, woman sitting in chair behind frame with outstretched legs with bare feet through the ankle holes, soles showing.

Then, so it doesn't just give me a sort of wooden ankle cuffs device, I'll add: the rest of the front of the stockade is made of solid wood.

Do this for every element you think is important. Here's a great video on effective language https://www.youtube.com/watch?v= Od3FRMLqwFk (remove space). For example, use the word "extremely" if you want something extremely detailed, or use "beautiful" to fix deformities. Not mentioned in the video, but my personal favorites that I use frequently are "well-proportioned" and "anatomically correct" for all human characters. But be efficient, so instead of putting that behind every body part, I just say "every aspect of her body is..." etc.

I try to describe elements as specifically as possible, but haven't gotten recognizable stocks. I tried your suggested wording, and it came closer. I'll keep fiddling.

 

[U.N.Owen]

Well, I kept fiddling, and this is by far the closest I've every gotten in Ideogram.

But so far I haven't been able to integrate the effect into a more complex scene, even using the same wording in the prompt.

 

[U.N.Owen]

Well, I kept fiddling, and this is by far the closest I've every gotten in Ideogram.

But so far I haven't been able to integrate the effect into a more complex scene, even using the same wording in the prompt.


View attachment 1066971

And then of course you have things like this, where her arms go into the restraints and come out feet. 🙄

 

[U.N.Owen]

How about some (totally fake) evidence of medieval kink practices?

 

[TKLR42]

Super cool stuff! Thanks for sharing!