Low_Roads
4th Level Black Feather
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2004
- Messages
- 8,986
- Points
- 48
When I said 6 hours, I meant the radio series: two seasons, 6 shows each, at a half hour apiece. The TV series (and by extension, the movie) adapt only the first season's plot, running three hours total (radio and TV). I was in error there.
I only ever read the first Hitchhiker's novel, which covers the first two-thirds or so of the first season. I didn't think the story worked particularly well as literature; Adams had to pad the plot with all sorts of cumbersome connecting tissue which detracted from its spriteliness.
Any film adaptation of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is going to face problems because Adams' story doesn't have strong narrative drive. It meanders and digresses, dipping constantly into guide entries for its color. You can get away with that in a multi-part series (or in a novel, though I remember the book as being more structurally linear), since you don't have to take it in one sitting. The breaks allow you to digest, restructure and prioritize the material. A movie doesn't have that luxury. Everything must be absorbed in one go. Stick strictly to essential plot points and the story becomes dry and pedestrian, since most of Adams' whimsy is found in digressions. But once you start to digress, the narrative becomes muddled and disconnected. Any film adaptation is going to face this dilema, no matter how long the running time.
I only ever read the first Hitchhiker's novel, which covers the first two-thirds or so of the first season. I didn't think the story worked particularly well as literature; Adams had to pad the plot with all sorts of cumbersome connecting tissue which detracted from its spriteliness.
Any film adaptation of Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy is going to face problems because Adams' story doesn't have strong narrative drive. It meanders and digresses, dipping constantly into guide entries for its color. You can get away with that in a multi-part series (or in a novel, though I remember the book as being more structurally linear), since you don't have to take it in one sitting. The breaks allow you to digest, restructure and prioritize the material. A movie doesn't have that luxury. Everything must be absorbed in one go. Stick strictly to essential plot points and the story becomes dry and pedestrian, since most of Adams' whimsy is found in digressions. But once you start to digress, the narrative becomes muddled and disconnected. Any film adaptation is going to face this dilema, no matter how long the running time.
Last edited: