• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

Fettish updates (running thread)

BDSM Scientific Experiment Report: "Operant Conditioning Through Tactile Stimulation in Restrained Subject"


Subject Overview
Name: Angel (23 y/o)
Physical Attributes: 164cm, 58kg, brunette (Caucasian), pedicured size 7 feet (arch: 12° curvature, heel-to-ball length: 17cm). Notable epidermal features: hyper-sensitive plantar region with zero callusing (Baumann Scale: 5.4 – “ultra-ticklish”).


Apparatus


  1. Restraint System
    • Hogtie Configuration: 4x vegetable-tanned leather belts (3.5cm width, 40N tensile strength)
    • Limb Segmentation:
      • Lower extremities: Straps above/below knees + ankle-to-thigh lock (15cm heel-to-buttocks compression)
      • Upper extremities: Box-tie restraint (parallel forearms cemented to lumbar region via cross-bicep strap)
    • Cranial Control: Full-head harness with 3.8cm spherical silicone gag (oral depression: 6.2cm), occipital ring tethered to hallux via 5mm kernmantle cord (rigid neck extension: 27° angle)

Experimental Procedure


  • Phase 1 (Sensitization): 18-minute baseline tickling using digital manipulation only (index/middle fingers @ 2.8Hz oscillation)
    • Target zones:
      • Plantar surface (metatarsal arch → lateral calcaneal border)
      • Intercostal regions T8–T12 (rib-spreading technique)
      • Cervical erector spinae (knuckling @ C4–C7)
  • Phase 2 (Behavioral Observation): Monitored escape attempts via pelvic thrust amplitude (motion-capture system tracking sacral displacement ≤0.5cm)

Observer Metrics


  1. Stimuli Interaction Analysis
    • Q1: Did lumbar hyperextension (pelvic tilt: 22°) amplify pedal reflex response?
    • Q2: Was gag-induced drool production (approx. 12ml/min) correlative to laughter decay patterns?
  2. Restraint Efficacy Assessment
    • Q3: Did the 40:1 strap-to-body contact ratio prevent humeral rotation during trapezius stimulation?
    • Q4: Could phalangeal hypermobility (observed MCP flexion: 78°) compromise wrist strap integrity?
  3. Neurological Paradox Evaluation
    • Q5: Did initial lacrimation (0:07:23) transition to rhythmic pelvic oscillations (0:9:41)?
    • Q6: Was post-experiment genital lubrication (2.3ml) incidental or reward-triggered?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_4204.jpeg
    IMG_4204.jpeg
    982 KB · Views: 17
  • IMG_4183.jpeg
    IMG_4183.jpeg
    459.7 KB · Views: 15
  • IMG_4182.jpeg
    IMG_4182.jpeg
    636.3 KB · Views: 12
  • IMG_4181.jpeg
    IMG_4181.jpeg
    436.1 KB · Views: 13
  • IMG_4179.jpeg
    IMG_4179.jpeg
    513.1 KB · Views: 11
  • IMG_4178.jpeg
    IMG_4178.jpeg
    457 KB · Views: 13
  • IMG_4180.jpeg
    IMG_4180.jpeg
    84.8 KB · Views: 21
What's New

4/15/2025
Visit the TMF Chat Room. It's free and always busy!
Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** brad11701 ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Back
Top