Boba_Fettish
TMF Regular
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2022
- Messages
- 195
- Points
- 43
BDSM Scientific Experiment Report: "Operant Conditioning Through Tactile Stimulation in Restrained Subject"
Subject Overview
Name: Angel (23 y/o)
Physical Attributes: 164cm, 58kg, brunette (Caucasian), pedicured size 7 feet (arch: 12° curvature, heel-to-ball length: 17cm). Notable epidermal features: hyper-sensitive plantar region with zero callusing (Baumann Scale: 5.4 – “ultra-ticklish”).
Apparatus
Experimental Procedure
Observer Metrics
Subject Overview
Name: Angel (23 y/o)
Physical Attributes: 164cm, 58kg, brunette (Caucasian), pedicured size 7 feet (arch: 12° curvature, heel-to-ball length: 17cm). Notable epidermal features: hyper-sensitive plantar region with zero callusing (Baumann Scale: 5.4 – “ultra-ticklish”).
Apparatus
- Restraint System
- Hogtie Configuration: 4x vegetable-tanned leather belts (3.5cm width, 40N tensile strength)
- Limb Segmentation:
- Lower extremities: Straps above/below knees + ankle-to-thigh lock (15cm heel-to-buttocks compression)
- Upper extremities: Box-tie restraint (parallel forearms cemented to lumbar region via cross-bicep strap)
- Cranial Control: Full-head harness with 3.8cm spherical silicone gag (oral depression: 6.2cm), occipital ring tethered to hallux via 5mm kernmantle cord (rigid neck extension: 27° angle)
Experimental Procedure
- Phase 1 (Sensitization): 18-minute baseline tickling using digital manipulation only (index/middle fingers @ 2.8Hz oscillation)
- Target zones:
- Plantar surface (metatarsal arch → lateral calcaneal border)
- Intercostal regions T8–T12 (rib-spreading technique)
- Cervical erector spinae (knuckling @ C4–C7)
- Target zones:
- Phase 2 (Behavioral Observation): Monitored escape attempts via pelvic thrust amplitude (motion-capture system tracking sacral displacement ≤0.5cm)
Observer Metrics
- Stimuli Interaction Analysis
- Q1: Did lumbar hyperextension (pelvic tilt: 22°) amplify pedal reflex response?
- Q2: Was gag-induced drool production (approx. 12ml/min) correlative to laughter decay patterns?
- Restraint Efficacy Assessment
- Q3: Did the 40:1 strap-to-body contact ratio prevent humeral rotation during trapezius stimulation?
- Q4: Could phalangeal hypermobility (observed MCP flexion: 78°) compromise wrist strap integrity?
- Neurological Paradox Evaluation
- Q5: Did initial lacrimation (0:07:23) transition to rhythmic pelvic oscillations (0:9:41)?
- Q6: Was post-experiment genital lubrication (2.3ml) incidental or reward-triggered?