Fettish updates (running thread)

[Boba_Fettish]

BDSM Scientific Experiment Report: "Operant Conditioning Through Tactile Stimulation in Restrained Subject"


Subject Overview
Name: Angel (23 y/o)
Physical Attributes: 164cm, 58kg, brunette (Caucasian), pedicured size 7 feet (arch: 12° curvature, heel-to-ball length: 17cm). Notable epidermal features: hyper-sensitive plantar region with zero callusing (Baumann Scale: 5.4 – “ultra-ticklish”).


Apparatus

1. Restraint System
   • Hogtie Configuration: 4x vegetable-tanned leather belts (3.5cm width, 40N tensile strength)
   • Limb Segmentation:
     • Lower extremities: Straps above/below knees + ankle-to-thigh lock (15cm heel-to-buttocks compression)
     • Upper extremities: Box-tie restraint (parallel forearms cemented to lumbar region via cross-bicep strap)
   • Cranial Control: Full-head harness with 3.8cm spherical silicone gag (oral depression: 6.2cm), occipital ring tethered to hallux via 5mm kernmantle cord (rigid neck extension: 27° angle)

Experimental Procedure

• Phase 1 (Sensitization): 18-minute baseline tickling using digital manipulation only (index/middle fingers @ 2.8Hz oscillation)
  • Target zones:
    • Plantar surface (metatarsal arch → lateral calcaneal border)
    • Intercostal regions T8–T12 (rib-spreading technique)
    • Cervical erector spinae (knuckling @ C4–C7)
• Phase 2 (Behavioral Observation): Monitored escape attempts via pelvic thrust amplitude (motion-capture system tracking sacral displacement ≤0.5cm)

Observer Metrics

1. Stimuli Interaction Analysis
   • Q1: Did lumbar hyperextension (pelvic tilt: 22°) amplify pedal reflex response?
   • Q2: Was gag-induced drool production (approx. 12ml/min) correlative to laughter decay patterns?
2. Restraint Efficacy Assessment
   • Q3: Did the 40:1 strap-to-body contact ratio prevent humeral rotation during trapezius stimulation?
   • Q4: Could phalangeal hypermobility (observed MCP flexion: 78°) compromise wrist strap integrity?
3. Neurological Paradox Evaluation
   • Q5: Did initial lacrimation (0:07:23) transition to rhythmic pelvic oscillations (0:9:41)?
   • Q6: Was post-experiment genital lubrication (2.3ml) incidental or reward-triggered?

 

[Boba_Fettish]

Asian hottie Kiara Star is tasked with resisting.

 

[Boba_Fettish]

https://www.clips4sale.com/studio/195475/fettish/Cat6-TICKLING/Page1/C4SSort-recommended/Limit24

 

[Jet1295]

Any plans for more F/F clips in the future?

Thanks

 

[Boba_Fettish]

The Homey Trap 1

** Experimental Log: T-9012 // Stress Inducement Protocol // Tickle Masochist Breaking Point Study**



Protocol Overview:



Objective: Assess the resilience of a self-identified tickle masochist under controlled, escalating stimulation protocols, emphasizing sensory deprivation and psychological pressure. The subject’s inability to speak or see amplifies the power dynamic, testing her endurance and willpower.



Key Adjustments:

• Sensory Deprivation: Blindfold and gag ensure no visual or auditory cues.
• Communication Limitation: Clicker-only system for stoppage requests, heightening psychological strain.

Stimulant Modalities Deployed:

• Digital Stimulation: Fingertip tracing along the medial and lateral arches.
• Whisker Brush: Feather-light sweeps across the soles, Industrial grade.
• Bastinado: Alternating wooden ruler strikes between feet, to heighten and confuse nerve endings.
• Bad Vibrations: Pulsating micro-vibrations via rubber-tipped inputs.
• Soft Manual Stimulation: Gentle, sweeping motions with oiled fingers.

Subjective Experience:

• Initial Stage: Muffled laughter and groans escaped despite the gag, accompanied by intense trembling. No verbal cues, only the sounds of her struggling against the restraints.
• Mid-Protocol: Her body language became erratic—jerking legs, squirming torso, all while the blindfold prevented her from anticipating the next move. The absence of verbalization heightened the dominance dynamic.
• Bad Vibrations Phase: Her gag was insufficient to muffle the high-pitched whimpers as micro-vibrations overwhelmed her senses. She tried to twist her head, but the blindfold and forehead restraint kept her completely at our mercy.

Constraint Matrix:

• Straightjacket: Full-body immobilization (custom-padded, maximum torque resistance).
• Tickle Therapy Chair: Angled at 78° for optimized access.
• Toe Bindings: Extreme dorsiflexion (82°, tendon strain monitor activated).
• Leg Restraints: Double-strap system, spread position enforced.
• Ankle Stocks: Wooden frame, complimented with secondary locking pins.
• Sensory Deprivation:
  • Blindfold: Industrial-grade black adhesive cloth blend wrap, secured with multiple wraps around the head.
  • Gag: Mouth sealed shut with microfilm taping, with more black adhesive wrap extended from eyes to mouth. Muffled sounds amplified her helplessness.

Tool Deployment & Response Metrics:

• Digital Stimulation:
  • Reaction: Gag completely sealed her mouth as she tried to scream, laugh, and plead. Self reported post testing resulted in fingers clawing within the strapped hand mechanisms.
  • Struggling Intensity: 8/10.
• Whisker Brush:
  • Reaction: Self reported silent tears soaked her blindfold. Body attempted to arch unnaturally against the chair in futility.
  • Struggling Intensity: 8/10.
• Bastinado:
  • Reaction: Muffled yelps at each strike, alternating with stifled laughter.
  • Struggling Intensity: 9/10.
• Bad Vibrations:
  • Reaction: Shift in laughter, body shook violently, straining against every restraint.
  • Struggling Intensity: 10/10.
• Soft Manual Stimulation:
  • Reaction: Convulsive shudders, silent pleading through desperation in an effort to resist orgasm.
  • Struggling Intensity: 9/10.

Termination Criteria:

• Stoppage Mechanism: Single-clicker held in right hand, strapped inside the jacket. Each activation = $200 deduction from final payout.
• Loss Condition: Involuntary ejaculation. Payout forfeiture triggered upon biofeedback spike exceeding 12mv (clitoral EMG sensor).

Observed Thresholds:

Observers are encouraged to take notes for the feedback portion, post experiment, detailing the points of surrender, and what triggered termination, if anything.





Conclusion:

Success Parameters Met:

• Protocol duration exceeded 50 minutes total, and shall be separated as phase one and phase two.
• Subject exhibited hallmark signs of tickle-induced subjugation: non-verbal struggle, silent pleading, total physical dominance.
• The absence of vision and verbal communication amplified her suffering, proving the psychological impact of sensory deprivation.

Tool Effectiveness Ranking (Based on Physical Responses):



Observers are again tasked with noting the greatest effective methods to break the specimen. Input shall be added to specimens file for future experimentation.

Special Note: Post-session, the subject communicated through written notes: "*Relentless… You win. I couldn’t hold it." – Classified as Stockholm Index Positive.

// END REPORT //

 

[Boba_Fettish]

Any plans for more F/F clips in the future?

Thanks

Just when I have 2 or more on set

 

[Boba_Fettish]

Second part of a marathon length experiment.

Tickle Therapy - The Honey Trap 2

Experimental Log: T-9012 // Sequel Study // Orgasm Denial & Enhanced Foot Torment (Revised)



Protocol Overview:

Objective: To explore the limits of a tickle masochist during prolonged orgasm denial, with an emphasis on foot torment and psychological manipulation. This sequel study builds upon the previous session's sensory deprivation and restraint conditions, with a heightened focus on the interplay between pleasure and frustration.



Key Adjustments:

• Tool Reduction: Focus narrowed to three primary tools:
  • Bare fingers (primary input).
  • Vibrating toothbrush (intermittent use for intense arousal spikes).
  • Soft white feather with a stiff quill (teasing and unpredictability).
• Stimulation Pacing: Sessions now include variable pacing to disorient the subject's ability to anticipate the next wave of stimulation.

Constraint Matrix:

• Straightjacket: Full-body immobilization (custom-padded, maximum torque resistance).
• Tickle Therapy Chair: Angled at 78° for optimized access.
• Toe Bindings: Extreme dorsiflexion (82°, tendon strain monitor activated).
• Leg Restraints: Double-strap system, spread position enforced.
• Ankle Stocks: Wooden frame, complimented with secondary locking pins.
• Sensory Deprivation:
  • Blindfold: Three overlapping layers of 6-inch veterinary wrap (self-adhesive, tensile strength: 85N), mummifying the orbital region. Zero light penetration confirmed. Skin indentations visible post-session.
  • Gag: Triple-wrap veterinary strip securing a silicone mouth guard over her tongue. Additional diagonal wraps circled her head vertically (chin-to-crown tension: 12psi). Jaw movement restricted to <0.2mm.

Subjective Experience & Response Metrics:

Initial Stage:

• The subject's vocalizations reduced to strained, nasal whines as the vetwrap gag compressed her jaw. Attempts to scream stretched the bandage over her lips, leaving visible indentations.
• Blindfold tension caused minor periorbital edema, further disorienting her spatial awareness.

Mid-Protocol:

• Feather quill strokes alternated with abrupt toothbrush vibrations (20Hz pulses) forced muffled laughter into gagged silence. Her head repeatedly jerked leftward—a reflexive attempt to evade stimulation she couldn’t see.
• Saliva seepage from the gag’s edges stained the vetwrap, creating a dampened crescent below her nose.

Orgasm Denial Phase:

• Fingertip tracing (1cm/sec) along her medial arch triggered involuntary toe-curling (98% flexion observed). Her breath hitched rhythmically, stale breath fogging the vetwrap blindfold.
• Four near-climax events (biofeedback: 11.9mV) were abruptly halted, causing violent hip thrusts against the chair’s leg restraints.

Tool Deployment & Response Metrics:

• Bare Fingers:
  • Reaction: Pre-orgasmic hyperventilation (respiratory rate: 38 breaths/min). Labial engorgement visible via thermal cam (+4.2°C).
  • Struggling Intensity: 8/10.
• Vibrating Toothbrush:
  • Reaction: Toothbrush application at metatarsal heads caused gag-stifled screams (vocal cord vibration: 220Hz).
  • Struggling Intensity: 9/10.
• Soft White Feather:
  • Reaction: Feather’s barbules triggered micro-twitches in her lesser toes (16/min frequency). Sustained use induced tear production, soaking the blindfold’s lower edge.
  • Struggling Intensity: 7/10.

Termination Criteria:

• Stoppage Mechanism: Single-clicker held in right hand, strapped inside the jacket. Each activation = $200 deduction from final payout.
• Loss Condition: Involuntary ejaculation. Payout forfeiture triggered upon biofeedback spike exceeding 12mv (clitoral EMG sensor).

Observed Thresholds:

• 00:14:12: First click (hand tremor detected). Vetwrap gag visibly warped from tongue pressure.
• 00:21:48: Second click (sustained click duration: 0.8s). Blindfold displacement attempts (0.3mm shift, corrected by observers).
• 00:34:05: Surrender confirmed via full-body convulsion (arousal spike to 12.3mV). Post-session analysis showed mottled bruising along gag pressure points.

Conclusion:

Success Parameters Met:

• Protocol duration extended to 41m17s, exceeding previous metrics by 18%.
• Vetwrap application amplified psychological distress, correlating to faster arousal escalation (+22% vs prior session).

Notable Physiological Responses:

• Tactile Hallucinations: Post-protocol debrief revealed subject perceived “ghost tickles” for 9m post-restraint removal.
• Oral Trauma: Lingual compression from gag left temporary dentition marks (faded within 4h).

Special Note: Subject’s final written feedback: “Couldn’t see… couldn’t scream… couldn’t stop.” Classified as compliance escalation.

 

[Boba_Fettish]

Hogtickled - MJ

 

[oxoforgotso]

Hogtickled - MJ

MJ looks like she needed this tickling!