• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • Check out Tickling.com - the most innovative tickling site of the year.
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

How important is the attractiveness of a tickling video model to you?

Solefully Yours featured a few plus size women, as well as older women. They prided themselves on the fact that their models weren't pro, which allowed them to sell tapes cheaper.
 
Wow, I didn't expect so many replies to my question. Thanks to all who've replied, and to others who will (I hope) in the future. This feedback is great research for me.

I guess I should try to reply to some of the replies, huh? That's fine, this is a lot of fun. I just hope I don't look like I'm hogging the thread if I post several times. I won't reply to each and every message, as I don't have enough inspiration, don't have relevant replies to everything, and not all posts refer to me anyway. But I'll do my part. It might take some time, though. I must admit I'm kind of tired right now and will have to do most of the job some other time.

Anyway, let's start with Tkltime,

Tkltime said:
Good question Francois.

Thank you, I thought so too. But I must confess it's mostly to guide my hiring strategy, though I do find the replies very interesting in and of themselves.

In my opinion it's the playfullness of the tickler and reaction of the ticklee that makes the big difference.

I agree with that, and that's what I try to get out of my models, though I do understand that most people prefer models they find attractive. Determining what "attractive" means to different people is the problem.

how many times have you seen posts deriding one of the video companies for using models who were beatiful, but appeared to be faking their laughter?

I've certainly read my share of such complaints in the past. Frankly, I don't see what's the point of having models fake. It's not so hard to find genuinely ticklish and willing models (though it is a challenge for me), it's boring, and people will notice anyway, which is bad for a company's reputation.

It's actually something that worries me a bit: that one day some people will think one of my models is faking, even though I know full well she's not.

You know, I recently did an audition with a model who was really easy to tickle with just about any technique I used (including simple light feathering), no matter where and how long I tickled her. Her reactions were constant and always intense. Sounds great on paper. But I'm really hesitant to hire her, because:

1-The type and level of her laughter were always exactly the same, like it was pre-recorded and looped laughter on tape. Fun for a while, but it gets old very quickly. Too regular to be believable;

2-While her stamina was impressive, it also got somewhat boring, because she never, ever asked me to stop or ease up, not even close, and didn't say a single word except when I asked her direct questions. Totally focused on her laughter, no interaction at all. Having a model lose it for some time while still showing good stamina is fun, but there has to be some level of exchange. Have her pass comments, complain a bit, ask me to stop from time to time, insult me, whatever. I just want something to vary the constant, never-changing laughter;

3-Her reactions to any type of tickling on any body part for any length of time were way too intense and unvarying to be credible. I know she was genuinely ticklish and wasn't faking at all, but I couldn't blame someone for thinking she was faking.

So basically, the reactions were pretty neat for a while, but for a while even I had trouble convincing myself it was real. It was fun, but I don't see how I could do more than a short scene with her (a very intense one, of course), and even then I'd be afraid people would accuse me/her of fakeness. Unfair, but understandable.
 
dodger said:
Attractiveness of the ticklee and tickler are of #1 importance to me. I'm sorry. If the girls are not attractive (or what i feel is attractive) then there's no sale, period.

dodger,

No need to be sorry, having some expectations when it comes to a model's looks is perfectly normal, and you're entirely free to feel that way. I know my videos and models aren't for everyone. No company has videos that please everyone (though for all I know, maybe Marie and/or Isabelle from my vid actually do suit(s) your tastes). Companies are different and feature different models, which is good, because people's tastes vary as well. I'm sure other companies feature models you like, and maybe even mine will from time to time (mostly referring to the models here, as I have no idea if you like the type of tickling I do in my videos).

Of course, I also think that enjoying, or even preferring more down to earth models is perfectly normal as well. And this doesn't mean they aren't attractive to the person who prefers them. I've done a number of sessions with models I've found very plain, but still attractive for some reason, even without doing any tickling or getting to know them. I mean from a physical point of view, here. A nice personality helps greatly, but a person can find plain looks very attractive. Then again, they might not look plain to him/her, and he/she can find girls that other people find attractive to be very plain indeed, even if they do match the tastes of the majority. It's all so subjective.

Unfortunately, this aimless little speech of mine doesn't do much to help me determine what looks are "marketable" within the context of a tickling video company. Fortunately, many people have posted much more useful comments in this thread.
 
TickleMantis said:
(thats not to say if you had a reaaaal ugly ticklee who was super ticklish I'd buy it, I wouldn't...I sound so shallow...I think I'm going to hell...I hope its tickle hell...now I'm rambling.)😛

As much as I hate to say it, I do agree that there's a "lower limit" for the looks of a useful model in a video. While there are people out there to find almost everybody attractive (which is great), one (like me) has to be realistic and realize that some people simply don't have what it takes to please enough people to make a video viable.

I have to say, I really hate it when I meet a candidate that I know from the start I won't be able to use, even if she turns out to be painfully ticklish. Not her fault at all, of course, but it makes me feel so bad. Usually I just can't get myself to admit it to her, for fear of hurting her feelings, and thus I sometimes end up having to do an audition session anyway. It makes me feel guilty for not being entirely honest with her and basically wasting her time. Does that make me a bad person? I don't know.

Fortunately, I think most of the candidates I meet have at least average looks, if not better in some cases (damn this sounds shallow), and the problem is mainly who's ticklish enough.

I certainly agree with your opinion that looks are somewhat important but that reactions to tickling are even more so, TickleMantis. I wish everyone thought that way. Note that there's nothing wrong with thinking looks are as important as tickishness, or even more important. It's just a matter of taste.
 
To LEB, ....Enny IS really pretty! I think maybe everyone should re-define -re-evaluate the "girl next door type...." There are certain levels of beauty that are defineable by each person...this is difficult to put into words....

Let's try this - there are categories of beauty. There are supermodels/runway models. Many consider them to be the top of the beauty ranking, because it's competitive and difficult to get into.
I am not attracted to that look. That is a certain look, I've studied entertainment, I know how they do their choosing. Take twenty magazines, or watch several runway shows. Compare pictures of the various model, and you will see a definite pattern. They must be a certain height, weight, build, have similiar facial features. I know what they are, and it's just not the features I'm attracted to. If a runway model was featured in a tickling video, I probably would not buy it, even if I liked the producer and had the money. Unless she had a beautiful laugh - Francois, that's another aspect you should consider. The laughter is as important as the looks. I mean, Priscilla from Real Tickling could not be a runway model, she doesn't have the build. Then there's the PlayBoy look, then the actress look, then the pageant look, etc. There are different looks. All the Miss Americas look similiar.

Rachelle from Real Tickling, the same model Big Jim loves (he's so right on that 🙂)is my favorite ticklish model, and has the best laugh. She fits into none of the categories I listed. She'll never win Miss America, she'll never be a runway model. But, I said she was my favorite model. If she was in a video, and ...oh God, if she was tickled on her pantyhose feet, well, I buy that video the second it was listed!

And I think that's your dilemna, Francois. The most beautiful girl I've ever met wouldn't fit into any of the "model" type categories, but if I die and go to heaven, and God offered any girl to choose from, I'd pick her so fast, God, in his infinite speed, would ask me to slow down.

I'd almost have to say, just do the video. BUT, use each girl in a different theme, plot, idea. Don't put them in stocks for EVERY video. I like the office style enviroment, but if that was used for EVERY video, I'd even get tired after a while. Read up on stories, check the web for pictures not related to tickling, but that would fit into a tickling picture. Check out magazines, and if you ever see a picture where you say, "Boy, that would be a great tickle position, or tickle situation," use it. Pay attention to outfits, and settings. After a while, you will see what people like and don't like. OR, they'll like everything! Use all the models you audition in different situations, and let the customers pick and choose what they like and don't. Because, there are a lot of other things people like, that you can use to your advantage. Bare feet, pantyhose, socks, outfits, tickling tools, bondage/tickling positions, are they in stocks, on a bed, tied to a chair, feet on a desk, a stool, on and on....

Whew...and that's just a start!
 
Re: Re: Re: Jim forgot alpha!

amk714 said:
You're right, Jim, my bad! 🙂 BTW, have you met Mercy? 😀

I HAVE NOW!!!:veryhappy 😀 :smilestar :happyfloa :bouncybou :rotate: :cool2: :dogpile:

Ticklemad, I have a question for ya. When you posted in the Personals Forum, you said you were only interested in meeting females for tickling fun. If you wanted to be in a video (which would not be able to be sold in the UK because of legal reasons, so it would have to be distributed by other means) would you be willing to waive that?
 
As someone who is more interested in the ticklish factor more than the looks factor in the few videos I do choose, I have to add a seperate thought. If the tickler in the video appears to find their ticklee attractive, if the tickler and the ticklee have a good flow between the two of them....well, they both become better looking.
Joby
 
Last edited:
milagros317 said:

Given the situation of having hired the pair, the more attractive woman should be the ticklee. It is her body that will be shown struggling, and her face laughing. Often only the hands of the tickler are shown.
If the most ticklish one happens to be the most attractive one as well, and the second girl simply doesn't have the looks I feel I need, then yes, having the most attractive girl be the ticklee for the whole session makes sense. However, if the second girls is kind of "borderline" for looks, without being especially unattractive, and is the most ticklish of the duo, I find it hard to justify not using her as a ticklee. It would be a waste of good ticklish potential. Besides, it would be hard to tell the girls that I prefer to have the more attractive one be the star, even though she's the less ticklish one. They would know it's a purely appearance-based decision, and I get the feeling they might feel hurt, especially the most ticklish one.

As for how much the tickler appears in a video, it's true that often you'll mostly see her arms and maybe the back or side of her head. But I don't always do just close-ups of the ticklee. It's good to get most general shots as well, and that means getting the tickler more fully. Because while the main show is the ticklee, it's also fun to watch the tickler's reactions, especially if she gets nasty and is obviously enjoying the experience. I see such a session as a team effort, not just one girl getting tickled by a pair of faceless hands. Unless I need to take care of the tickling myself, in which case I try to be as discreet as possible.
 
Re: I can attest,....

Hello CDFGA,

CDFGA said:
I promise you, there are plenty of beautiful knock-out's out there that are very, very ticklish. You just have to find them.

Be patient, my friend.

BTW, do you still have copies availible of the first tape you made? I need your address so I can sent you $$ for it. I want one.

Certainly there are many beautiful girls out there that are very ticklish. But their simple existence isn't enough to produce videos. I need them to call me and remain interested until we do a video. That's tough. If I wait until I got a very ticklish knockout model, I might end up offering only one video per 6 months. That's not something I see as an acceptable situation. I can't afford to be that patient. Besides, I really don't need knockouts. I just need decent-looking girls who are fun and ticklish.

As for my video, sure, I still have copies. I can make as many as I need. I don't have a problem providing my address here:

Francois Arsenault
2373, Nicolas-Pinel, #402
Sainte-Foy, Quebec, G1V 4J1
Canada

However, it at all possible, I would prefer that you go to the appropriate section of my web site and print the order form (which happens to include my address on it). Or, if you don't have a printer, at least make a hand-made copy that contains all the same info as the order form, including the signature at the bottom. It makes for a cleaner transaction, avoiding mistakes. Thanks.
 
Phineas said:
conversely, I find a tickler who can't keep their mouth shut an incredible annoyance. Most of the verbal taunting I have seen in videos is corny, abrasive, and just plain god-awful.

Yes, sometimes the tickler's chatter can be annoying, but usually that's when she's been told to say those silly things, like she has to play a role and deliver a scripted dialogue. She ends up saying things that you only read in tickle fiction, not stuff any normal person would say spontaneously in everyday life.

If one leaves the models free to say whatever they want, what comes naturally to them, then I think it can be a great show. Granted, the fact that my videos will likely be in French more often than English makes the issue somewhat moot for most people, but at least I won't tell the models what to say, and it won't look fake. There shouldn't be any acting in a video like mine.

On the other hand, I agree that a tickler shouldn't talk so much that her comments get in the way of the ticklee's reactions. One simply has to find the right balance.

and Francois, I understand your difficulty in getting models; women are, as a rule, very camera-shy, regardless of how attractive they are.

True, that is one possible problem, but not the most common one in my case. In fact, I'm rather surprised at the variety in looks of candidates that try out for my videos. I hate to say this, but some aren't very realistic. So if anything, I get more willing candidates that aren't quite as attractive as needed than attractive ones that drop out because they don't think they're attractive enough. In fact, I've never had a model come up with that particular excuse before.

The main reason why many candidates drop out is the context of the market. Sure, it's only tickling, without nudity or other adult elements, and the pay is decent enough. But many girls aren't comfortable with the idea that, while the content of the videos is down to earth, strangers will be buying copies so that they can, well, you know, enjoy them in the way most ticklephiles do. Some models don't care, but it's definitely a major issue and the main cause of candidate losses.

Another somewhat touchy issue is bondage. Not everyone is ok with it. It certainly adds a slightly kinky side to videos that are otherwise would be very banal to most people. But it's not a big problem overall. If it weren't for the adult context of the market, I wouldn't care at all about the few losses due to the fear of bondage, as most people either accept it or find it amusing, and I would still get all the models I need.
 
Mabus, I know what you mean about "over-attractive" people. For example, Britney Spears does virtually nothing for me. Enny looks better than Britney to me. I would choose my ex’s over Britney on looks alone, never mind personality 🙂 Yet many people swear she is the best looking person they'll ever lay eyes on. Wonder what she looks like in the morning with no makeup.
I've never bought a video, but I think Jacky (Magic touch) is one of my favourite ever tickle models.
Oh and is Rachelle the girl with almost shoulder length blonde hair from older tc videos? That is a complete stab in the dark and I have no idea if I’m right, but she is the finest model I’ve seen appear at femfeet. Tell me if I’m right.
 
Re: The more ticklish the better

Novus said:
Another way you might get your videos to sell more without attractive models is if you can find a very ticklish girl who hates to be tickled but she needs the money so badly that she does the video anyway. Tickle her long and hard and you will have a best seller on your hands.

To tell the truth I wouldn't mind such a situation, but finding such a model who's willing to go through it is a huge challenge for me. Maybe if I could approach some people directly and talk to them about it, maybe they would open up. But I can't do that, and a person who really hates tickling isn't very likely to answer some strange ad. At least that's my experience.

Also, I couldn't entirely complain about a girl being motivated by a need for money, but I wouldn't feel quite right having her go through it because she's desperate. Don't want to take advantage, you know. Well, I guess if it were only the tickling itself that she hated it wouldn't be so bad. But if she were uncomfortable with the adult nature of the market but pushed herself to do it anyway just because she needs money, I'd have a problem with that. I certainly don't want any models feel bad about themselves and regret having posed for one of my videos.
 
mabus said:
You'd basically have to show us what they look like, before anyone can really say if they believe they are beautiful or not.

That would be a very convenient method. However, it's impossible for me to post pictures of models who've only done audition sessions. At the beginning of such a session we both sign a legal document that says that while I do film the audition I can't distribute the resulting footage in any way. It's just a work tool for me. And even if it weren't for the legal aspect of it, I don't think many of the girls would be very pleased if I posted their pics online so that some people can decide who is good enough to do a video. It wouldn't be right.

I've heard people describe models as "okay," when they were drop dead gorgeous, and others describe them as stunning, when they were pretty bland.

Indeed. I feel the same way in many cases. I mean, I can see when a girl is very attractive to most people. But she may very well look rather uninteresting to me. Many girls that aren't head-turners can catch my interest a lot more easily. I don't know, I guess one of the things that makes a girl look really beautiful to most people is that her features follow certain "perfection" standards which tend to look rather uninspired to me. Like I said, it's like they all look alike. Nothing wrong with that per se, but it's just not my thing. A girl needs to have more character in her face to please me, and often that means some subtle (or not quite so subtle) flaws, or a very unique face. I prefer "cute" and "pretty" to "beautiful", as the latter suggests some level of physical glamour that I'm not especially attracted to.
 
BigJim said:
Marie did have her odd moments when she could look very odd, one example being when Isabelle is tickling her ribs. Suddenly, Marie has the eys of The Terminator!

Hehehe! Yeah, I know what you mean. Personally I find it very amusing, but I guess it's not for everyone.

Isabelle is both more ticklish and the better looking of the two. (IMO anyhow, others may disagree.)

I can see how Isabelle can be considered the more attractive girl of the duo, and I must admit she's adorable. But they's simply two very different types. Using my "cute/pretty/beautiful" system, I would say Isabelle is more on the cute side and Marie more on the pretty side. Then again, what do I know about this kind of thing?

On the other hand, you could take two of MTP's videos like Phoenix's First Time and Farra's First Time. Both girls are very ticklish, but Pheonix is the better looking.

Interesting. I agree that Phoenix is very attractive, and I'm sure a lot of people share your preference, but personally I'm much more attracted to Farra, no contest. And it's not even a question of personality or ticklishness. I simply find Farra to be the more attractive girl physically. I would be thrilled if I could hire a girl like her.

Of course, even though she's eclipsed by Phoenix in looks, Farra is still a very attractive looking woman, so you might not consider this example relavent.

Well, like I said, I actually find Farra more attractive, but even if I didn't it's pretty obvious that both would be plenty attractive enough for one of my vids. Farra would be more the type I'm looking for, though.

Laura has quite plain looks, I still watch that video more often than I do Phoenix's, because Phoenix barely gets above a giggle more than twice in the whole hour.

Laura might look plain according to the usual standards, but even if her reactions weren't ultra intense (while still very good), I still wouldn't hesitate to hire her. Her looks suit the needs of my videos just fine. I find her a lot more attractive than a number of other models that are supposedly more attractive than her. But that's just me.

It's fascinating how the tastes of two different people can vary in such ways, even though both agree that the girls are all attractive.

Watching a video, looks would be more important for me, but a girl would have to be quite ugly before I would'nt watch it.

I certainly agree with that. Question is, do many people feel the same way?

Good luck with Last Laugh Beta Francois, and even better luck with Last Laugh's gamma, delta, epsilon, zeta , eta, theta, iota, kappa, lamba, mu, nu, xi, omicron, pi, rho, sigma, tau, epsilon,phi chi psi and omega! May they all be as good as the first.

Wow, if I could only get as far as Omega....Who knows, maybe I will. I certainly hope so. But right now I'd be happy to release a Last Laugh Beta.
 
Re: Being a Tickle Model

Ticklish Mercy said:
I know if I could be in a ticklin video I'd be totally terrified, half backing out of it when it came to being restrained, but if the Tickler basically guilted me into it (dont waste my time, and effort etc) and bullshitted me he wouldnt tickle much (lol) I'd get myself into the restraints. Then when he tickled me and I went ballistic it would be ok as I couldnt go anywhere, lol.

That's a very interesting perspective you have there, Mercy. If you're ok with such a situation, then good for you, I guess. But I couldn't do it. I couldn't live with myself if I had to make a model feel guilty enough to do the video more or less against her will, or lie to her to get her to do it. That's not how I work. I would feel very uncomfortable about it, and I'm the one who would feel guilty. I need to be as honest as possible with a model, and I need her to be totally at ease with doing the video (though she may still be somewhat fearful of the tickling). Otherwise there's no session.

Besides, in the majority of cases, if I started bullying models they would simply send me to hell (with good reason) and I would be earning myself a very bad reputation indeed. [/B][/QUOTE]

Ah well, being in a tickling video is an all time ambition of mine...something I know would push me over the edge of what I can stand (being a horribly insanely ticklish girlie).
But I live in scotland too! Bugger.

That's too bad. I mean, there's nothing wrong with living in Scotland, but it does mean getting together to work on a project is basically impossible. A shame, because I've never met a model with your very special attitude towards tickling before, and I admit it's very intriguing.
 
LEB said:
For example (don't know if this this allowed, but hey anyone can see it in the member pics anyway) I had a look through the member pics the other night, and I found a perfect example of (what I think is) a "girl next door" type who I'd be happy to see in a tickling video. Apologies to "Enny" if I'm offending you by using your pic.

Not only is Enny indeed totally the "girl next door" type according to my own definition, she also happens to be a very cute example of a gnd. If Enny were available, interested and sufficiently ticklish I would hire her as soon as I had the time and money. No hesitation there. Yep, Enny, if you're reading this, I must congratulate you, you're very cute and pretty indeed.

I realise you're going for "fully clothed" (which is fine), but I'd like to see some kind of sleveless top so the girls armpits are fully exposed.

Oh, well, "fully clothed" doesn't mean "dressed like a nun". Marie and Isabelle just happened to be wearing T-shirts. I've no problem with models wearing sleeveless tops if they're comfortable wearing them. It can be very convenient if a girl's armpits are sensitive to light touches. If more vigorous digging in required to get them going, then it really doesn't matter, and a simple T-shirt can do just as well.
 
Ticklish Mercy said:
What i meant was...id be scared purely of the fact that id be about to get totally tickled....even though id want to be. but its hard to get a ticklish person(especially as bad as me) to give themselves up for that kinda torture, and id just need gentle persuasion and a few minutes to take a deep breath and go for it.

Oh, I'm very sorry, I guess I misunderstood you. Encouraging a model to do it without actively pushing her into it, rather doing my best to reassure her about such a session, is perfectly fine by me. What you say makes perfect sense. My mistake.

i think you have a wonderful approach to the whole things including your views on looks. what a nice man🙂

Why thank you, that's very kind of you to say. I just think it's essential to develop a feeling of mutual trust between the models and myself.
 
Francois, I hope you don't take my next words as an effort to get a free video or anything. 😀

From what you've said in a couple of posts here, you appear to be a guy of the utmost integrity, with a wonderful attitude towards your models. I hope anyone who deals with a similar situation (myself included) has the morals you do. Well done mate.

Okay, that's the brown nosing done with. lol I'm off now.
 
Francois A said:





Interesting. I agree that Phoenix is very attractive, and I'm sure a lot of people share your preference, but personally I'm much more attracted to Farra, no contest. And it's not even a question of personality or ticklishness. I simply find Farra to be the more attractive girl physically. I would be thrilled if I could hire a girl like her.





I guess I should clarify that. If I saw either girl from just the neck up, I'd say Phoenix was the prettier. But overall Farra does take it. Her feet are better taken care of than Phoenix's (only a true foot guy would notice that! :devil: But I guess kicking through all those bricks would harden Phoenix's a little.) So From the ankles down :blaugh: I'd go for Farra. It wasn't as if Phoenix wasn't ticklish, she just had the world's most merciful tickling being the ler in her First Time video. I guess that Farra is about as ticklish as it's humanly possible to get though. (Although Jeff did recently change his title of "MTP's Most Ticklish Girl" from Farra to Dita. Sadly, I don't have any of Dita's videos yet.)
 
Ticklish Mercy said:
okay. that wasnt quite what i meant. I totally appreciate you not wanting to do the video against the models will and im not saying id wanna be forced into restraints if i changed my mind. i think i put that wrong. What i meant was...id be scared purely of the fact that id be about to get totally tickled....even though id want to be. but its hard to get a ticklish person(especially as bad as me) to give themselves up for that kinda torture, and id just need gentle persuasion and a few minutes to take a deep breath and go for it.
So sorry bout that, and i think you have a wonderful approach to the whole things including your views on looks. what a nice man🙂
And yeah...id love to be in one of your vids too. and as you said its impossible. argh.
thanks though😀
Mercy x :devil:

That is a shame Mercy. I guess you'd just have to find a tickling video maker in the UK somewhere. 🙁

***Big Jim wanders off whistling innocently.***
 
BigJim said:
I guess I should clarify that. If I saw either girl from just the neck up, I'd say Phoenix was the prettier. But overall Farra does take it.

I see. Interesting distinction. Personally, I prefer Farra's face. No offense to Phoenix of course, who's also very pretty and most certainly appreciated by a large number of tickle fans, including myself. It's just a matter of taste.

I don't pay all that much attention to the body overall. I mean, I do like a nice body, and I know it's a somewhat important issue for a video, but as long as a model's body looks ok (without being anything special), the face is much more important to me.

Her feet are better taken care of than Phoenix's (only a true foot guy would notice that!

I have to admit, Farra's feet are awesome.
 
Francois A said:
You know, I recently did an audition with a model who was really easy to tickle with just about any technique I used (including simple light feathering), no matter where and how long I tickled her. Her reactions were constant and always intense. Sounds great on paper. But I'm really hesitant to hire her, because:

Please, hire this girl and do a video with her. She sounds so ticklish that the video will be great.

1-The type and level of her laughter were always exactly the same, like it was pre-recorded and looped laughter on tape. Fun for a while, but it gets old very quickly. Too regular to be believable.

This is not really a problem. Maybe for part of the video you could gag her to see how she reacts. 😀

2-While her stamina was impressive, it also got somewhat boring, because she never, ever asked me to stop or ease up, not even close, and didn't say a single word except when I asked her direct questions. Totally focused on her laughter, no interaction at all. Having a model lose it for some time while still showing good stamina is fun, but there has to be some level of exchange. Have her pass comments, complain a bit, ask me to stop from time to time, insult me, whatever. I just want something to vary the constant, never-changing laughter.

Tickling a truely ticklish girl is never boring. She will eventually break down at the end. Tickle her for as long as it takes. Edit out some of the slow parts if you must.

3-Her reactions to any type of tickling on any body part for any length of time were way too intense and unvarying to be credible. I know she was genuinely ticklish and wasn't faking at all, but I couldn't blame someone for thinking she was faking. So basically, the reactions were pretty neat for a while, but for a while even I had trouble convincing myself it was real. It was fun, but I don't see how I could do more than a short scene with her (a very intense one, of course), and even then I'd be afraid people would accuse me/her of fakeness. Unfair, but understandable.

I am getting excited just hearing you say that. A girl with such intense reactions that some may not think it is real would make a great video. Some will call it fake because they have never seen anything like it but for many of us, we will know it is real.

I would pay to see this girl tied and tickled in many different positions. She sounds so ticklish she just cannot help herself. If you turn this girl down you would be making a big mistake. There is no such thing as a perfect model and if you turn every other model that fails to live up to perfection you will soon be out of the buisness.
 
Just thought I would say thanks to the compliments of those who have been talking about me...Just to let you guys know I will hopefully be doing a video with Jeff, but not anytime soon..My schedule is way too full at the moment, but it will come in time. I'm still thinking on it....But well thanks again.
🙂 🙄 You got a girl blushing that's for sure!:yowzer: :blush:
 
Nice to meet you, Enny!

I hope that video is made, you're pretty! 😉 I also wish you'd post more often, like once every 2 months! 😛
 
Enny said:
Just thought I would say thanks to the compliments of those who have been talking about me...Just to let you guys know I will hopefully be doing a video with Jeff, but not anytime soon..My schedule is way too full at the moment, but it will come in time. I'm still thinking on it....But well thanks again.
🙂 🙄 You got a girl blushing that's for sure!:yowzer: :blush:


What have I been telling you for months girlie? Would'nt believe me would you? Well now you got no choice. 😀
 
What's New

2/25/2025
Visit the TMF Links Forum and see what is happening on tickling sites around the web.
Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** brad1701 ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Back
Top