TicklingDuo
3rd Level Yellow Feather
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2001
- Messages
- 3,733
- Points
- 0
About the article and Yaqi's statements....
NO COMMENT!!!
Ann
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce707/ce70786fc3588d15788fce258ca387a14db21820" alt="SoWrong :sowrong: :sowrong:"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ce707/ce70786fc3588d15788fce258ca387a14db21820" alt="SoWrong :sowrong: :sowrong:"
Ann
Last edited:
slacker2114 said:1. I never thought highly of Yaqi. He always struck me as nothing more than a pompous egomaniac who felt everyone should bow down and kiss his ass. Just my personal opinion.
I don't know of Yaqi too much but I saw him on Stern once. He seemed to be making a fool of himself by thinking he was God's gift to whatever. My impression of him pretty much matches your opinion.
MadKalnod said:Now, if I were a borderline sociopath with a narcissistic streak that made Michael Jackson look like St. Francis of Assisi
Originally posted by MadKalnod
This is what's so interesting about Yaqi and Kujman's Manifestos. They seem to be the ones most guilty of the crime of which they accuse the entire TMF: Not having a life beyond their fetish.
Both have all but stated that Tickling (Capital T) is the center, be-all and end-all, of their existence;
that all acts are to be judged solely on the basis of whether they advance or retard their personal vision of Tickling;
and that their having made some tickling videos and tossed some scraps to the insatiable Crotch-Potatoes is a mark of moral superiority.
They brag about being "Open" about their fetish while others hide in shame. Unfortunately for them, however, there's a big difference and a thick line between "Being open about one's sexuality" and "Being confrontational about one's sexuality." I admit that I enjoy tickling and feet if asked, but I don't make it the first piece of personal information with which I introduce myself.
Kujman and Yaqi, as well as the Crotch-Potatoes above, seem to think that Tickling is the most important criteria by which all decisions should be made, but it just doesn't trump all of their unsavory characteristics.
Totally agree with this point. Put aside his cruel comments and everything and just look at Yaqi. What you have is a guy who really is not a very good tickler at all. From the clips I have seen of him he kind of turns into a freek when he starts tickling and kind of pokes and prods in a painful way with his knuckles. And his face gets a really weird frightening look on it. For being the king of all tickling, shouldn't he kind of know how to tickle first????????????????gig1965 said:His comments smack of the Napoleon Complex.
He certainly does have delusions of grandeur if he
thinks he is even close to the tickler that TIB is.
h.
Myriads said:Krokus said: I see my post was deleted. How could you defend that Ego maniac??? You know, the "Golden Rule" is reeeeaaaalllyy starting to piss me off.
This deserves an answer.
The golden rule is not designed to defend any one individual. It's in place to defend the atmosphere of the forum in whole. Thus it gets applied across the spectrum of posters regardless of who gets defended by it in any one given application. This is regardless of if the person who benefits from the defense is someone who has been positive or negative towards us elsewhere, or here in the past.
Your comments were direct insults. Thus the basis for flames. Thus removed. Period. You've been here long enough to know the drill. Direct insults don't tend to last long.
A lot of this thread has walked the fine line of being removed, and as you can see it's been edited more times than any other that I can remember. Time and again we've removed directed insults, and tried to preserve opinions. Flame free does not equal opinion free, but it's a line that many have a hard time seeing.
Here is an example:
"Myriads is a fucking idiot."
That's an insult. It's flame bait (or could be if I cared) it will be removed under the golden rule.
compare to:
"I think Myriads is a fucking idiot because he always edits my posts"
That's a crudly worded opinion. While we would prefer users to be a bit more civil in stating an opinion, it's still a valid expression of an idea that is more then an insult. There is a point to debate beyond simple feelings. People can discuss and debate the merit of why my editing makes me a fucking idiot.
That's why opinions that look insulting often stay on the forum. They are valid discussion points. We do kill them sometimes though, simply because some folks use their opinions as flame platforms. It's a judgement call at that point, and it's why we have a thread removal process to be sure that the calls being made by mods are good.
As I said above flame free does not equal opinion free.
Discussion and debate are good, it leads to better understanding between people with different views, and it needs to be fed with ideas and informed opinions. Argument is bad and divides, and we will take away it's fuel so it will find no home here. It's that simple.
Be well,
Myriads
Havsoker said:Not a bad lead in!
I posted a comment in support of a good point made by Venray. I just checked to see if there was any further discussion and noted that both Venray's comment as well as my response are missing. Given that both more than complied with the Golden Rule, may I presume that we are experiencing technical difficulties? 😕
dvnc said:
I 'spect you're correct, Havsoker, in that there's no record of any mod yankin' your post in this thread. On behalf of the capricious tendencies of network databases, I do apologize, sir. If I'm mistaken about this mistake, I'm bettin' a fellow mod will correct my correction.
dvnc