• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

Is this (banned) advert in bad taste?

You know, the distinction a lot of us are drawing between "natural disasters" and human actions is a little misleading. There's a human element in any disaster, including the tsunami. There was a reason 280 000 people died that day. There's a reason why a little girl was responsible for saving more lives that day than the entire Thai government, when she singlehandedly got a beach evacuated because she knew a tsunami was about to hit. Human ignorance and government apathy can kill.

Maybe that was another point the ad was trying to make...do nothing now and you'll be guilty of what happens next. :shrug:
 
Then you're guilty of the same sort of parochial myopia that he is. The world doesn't revolve around the US; my money is that the film-makers responsible made a badly-judged attempt to shock people into caring about ecological issues, rather than doing it just to spite Americans.

Did you actually read my original post asshole? Did you? I seriously fuckin doubt it. If you honestly think the timing was not done on purpose you are a moron.

Not ONCE did i ever say the world revolved around the US.

First off, of course it's in bad taste. It would be in bad taste if it took ANY event throughout history that was man killing man to demonstrate what a natural disaster does. Why not use images of people being gased? Or mass graves in Iraq when Saddam used chemical weapons to kill people? I could go on and on.

The only thing this ad does is point the finger at the US to say we don't care about the rest of the world. Which is the only thing any of the people who think this ad is good are saying. This ad has NOTHING to do with saving the planet at all.



Whether or not we stop abusing the planet the Tsunami will still happen. It was caused by an earthquake deep inside the earth.

Point out in that where i said the world revolved around the US. You can't because i didn't, shithead. The people who made that video could have used either of the examples i pointed out in my post above. Both of which are FAR WORSE then what happen on 9/11. You are by far the most myopic person in this thread.

Think before you post asshole.
 
vladtickleman22 can the language dude! Read the GOLDEN RULE *flashy music* and then try again before some mod sees you end up like the advert yeah? good lad
 
Did you actually read my original post asshole? Did you? I seriously fuckin doubt it. If you honestly think the timing was not done on purpose you are a moron.

And if you honestly think it was, then you're self-absorbed and ignorant.

Not ONCE did i ever say the world revolved around the US.

Your self-absorption and ignorance speaks for you, sir. "THEY DID IT TO SPITE THE US" = you are self absorbed and ignorant, and apparently think that the only reason anyone does anything is because of the USA.

Point out in that where i said the world revolved around the US. You can't because i didn't, shithead. The people who made that video could have used either of the examples i pointed out in my post above. Both of which are FAR WORSE then what happen on 9/11. You are by far the most myopic person in this thread.

Think before you post asshole.

Don't use words unless you know what they mean. What is "myopic"? How am I "myopic"? Explain, please.

Also,

RAEG.jpg
 
And if you honestly think it was, then you're self-absorbed and ignorant.



Your self-absorption and ignorance speaks for you, sir. "THEY DID IT TO SPITE THE US" = you are self absorbed and ignorant, and apparently think that the only reason anyone does anything is because of the USA.



Don't use words unless you know what they mean. What is "myopic"? How am I "myopic"? Explain, please.

Also,

RAEG.jpg

I see you're less intelligent then i originally thought. How is the timing done on purpose? Because the dare is right around the corner that's how. So again, you're both an asshole and an idiot.

Being an asshole, you can't see the what is right in front of your face. As i said in my original post. They could have used events in human history that were far far worse then what happen on 9/11. Choosing to use that footage this close to the anniversary of the event was done on purpose. Putting words in my mouth now, that's tactless. Never once did i say everyone does things because of the USA. Strike two for asshole and idiot.


How are you myopic? Because much like you accuse people of seeing things one specific way. You only see them in that same way. Saying things like this was not done on purpose due to the timing of it. Why choose an event that happen 8 years ago? There were bombings in the UK that happen more recently then that. But no! There's no way they could have used it to take a jab at the USA. Not possible!

As far as the dumb little picture goes. You're pathetic and i was simply seeing what i could get away with. Aparently quite a bit.
 
I see you're less intelligent then i originally thought. How is the timing done on purpose? Because the dare is right around the corner that's how. So again, you're both an asshole and an idiot.

The advert was created and approved in late 2008; it was posted on this forum a few days before Spetember 11th. That, to me at least, doesn't suggest they made the ad and released it with the express purpose of offending people on the 11th of September.

Being an asshole, you can't see the what is right in front of your face.

I see it plain as day. I just don't like to take things at face value and have a big RAEG about them, so I go off and look stuff up.

As i said in my original post. They could have used events in human history that were far far worse then what happen on 9/11.

Sure they could've. They didn't, though; maybe in late 2008 using the WTC attack to demonstrate the devastation caused by the Asian tsunami seemed like a good idea?

Choosing to use that footage this close to the anniversary of the event

Late 2008.

was done on purpose. Putting words in my mouth now, that's tactless. Never once did i say everyone does things because of the USA. Strike two for asshole and idiot.

I'll say so.

How are you myopic? Because much like you accuse people of seeing things one specific way.

That's not myopia.

You only see them in that same way. Saying things like this was not done on purpose due to the timing of it. Why choose an event that happen 8 years ago? There were bombings in the UK that happen more recently then that. But no! There's no way they could have used it to take a jab at the USA. Not possible!

http://www.wwf.org.br/informacoes/english/?21261/Note-of-Clarification

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/sep/03/wwf-911-tsunami-ad

If they did indeed do it with the express intent of taking a swipe at the USA on the anniversary of the WTC attacks, their timing was off by about 6 months.

As far as the dumb little picture goes. You're pathetic and i was simply seeing what i could get away with. Aparently quite a bit.

Of course you were! :headpat:
 
Ah, flame wars are awesome... :popcorn:

Vlad, keep in mind that they didn't actually "do it" at all, not on Sept 11 or any other date. The ad didn't air. So there was no timing involved. If WWF had accepted it, the decision would have been up to them when to air it. There's no reason to think they would have used it anytime in September. But they didn't even accept it in the first place.
 
rofl ^5 c7
the ironic thing is the more people talk of this advert and the more pages that are added to this thread the more successful it becomes! Just goes to show how powerful advertising is 🙂
 
Ah, flame wars are awesome... :popcorn:

Vlad, keep in mind that they didn't actually "do it" at all, not on Sept 11 or any other date. The ad didn't air. So there was no timing involved. If WWF had accepted it, the decision would have been up to them when to air it. There's no reason to think they would have used it anytime in September. But they didn't even accept it in the first place.

I was bored and seeing how far i can go before i get banned. *shrug* not yet so whatever. Tired of that game now. Btw, NEST '10 you and me gotta have a few beers.

The advert was created and approved in late 2008; it was posted on this forum a few days before Spetember 11th. That, to me at least, doesn't suggest they made the ad and released it with the express purpose of offending people on the 11th of September.



I see it plain as day. I just don't like to take things at face value and have a big RAEG about them, so I go off and look stuff up.



Sure they could've. They didn't, though; maybe in late 2008 using the WTC attack to demonstrate the devastation caused by the Asian tsunami seemed like a good idea?



Late 2008.



I'll say so.



That's not myopia.



http://www.wwf.org.br/informacoes/english/?21261/Note-of-Clarification

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2009/sep/03/wwf-911-tsunami-ad

If they did indeed do it with the express intent of taking a swipe at the USA on the anniversary of the WTC attacks, their timing was off by about 6 months.



Of course you were! :headpat:

Thanks for being entertaining Scruff. At least i know you can argue well even with someone who is acting crazy. 😀 Though, gotta think how much of it was an act? hahaha hook, line and sinker.

rofl ^5 c7
the ironic thing is the more people talk of this advert and the more pages that are added to this thread the more successful it becomes! Just goes to show how powerful advertising is 🙂

Which is what matters anyway. People thinking about things.
 
In case you didn't actually read my first post, I clearly stated that I was speaking as a resident of New York City and noted that I was directly affected by the attacks.

Let me repeat: They are free to make such a video. I am free to hate their fucking guts.

And let me add: And I do.

PS: This thread should be moved to the P&R Forum.
 
Depending on your perspective it is, at best, the same non-logic. From where I'm sitting, as a person whose mother wasn't murdered in the WTC attacks, it's shitty and manipulative.

Hmmm....let's see....Tsunami----WTC attack. That's an apples to apples comparison if I ever saw one........

Thousands of citizens killed by a man's hand.......mother getting murdered by man's hand........wow, those two have absolutely nothing in common. Thank you for showing me the light Scruff; I never would've done it without you.


Is this the Brazil where 10 year olds carry guns, the police execute restrained, unarmed suspects in the street, leprosy is still a problem, and prison consists of 60 men, one room, and a bucket? I'd say they have enough problems without terrorism.

Don't believe the Snoop Dogg/ Justin Timberlake videos of sparkly girls and golden beaches; Brazil is a fucking shithole.

The problems in Brazil have been going on long before you hit the earth Scruff and if they don't concentrate on solutions, they'll be there long after we both die. Here's a novel concept; how about they spend more time finding solutions to their own problems as opposed to using a so-called advertisement timed very closely to 9/11 (considering that's tomorrow here in the US). As you said, they have plenty of problems.........

I'd be very surprised if they made it to coincide with the anniversary, or indeed the anniversary even occurred to them. September 11th in Brazil is most likely a day when the national media outlets make some mention of the WTC attacks whilst everyone just goes on with their lives.

Same as it is in the UK.

Exactly when did this get posted to this forum? Days before the 9/11 anniversary? How about using natural disasters to compare to........wait a minute.........er........umm........NATURAL DISASTERS?? Then you're making a correct comparison, not comparing Tsunamis to jet plane attacks. Just for clarification purposes because I'm not the only one who can be accused with tunnel vision here; natural disasters have NOTHING in common with terrorist attacks with one exception; everyone involved ended up dead. Use the correct concepts and scenarios then folks just might not be either scratching their heads or becoming completely pissed off. Just how hard is that?? I'm sure by your next response, you'll come up with a witty retort to answer that............:roseglasses:

Tangental, yes; but I don't see how comparing a natural disaster to a terrorist attack is the same as comparing a natural disaster to watching a video of my mother being murdered.

Explained above; you may not like it, but it's pretty real...........

Because you can have lived through something like that, and STILL make manipulative comparisons. He was attempting to manipulate people's feelings by likening the comparison to watching mothers being murdered; just like how you're being manipulative by drawing attention to the suffering of New Yorkers in order to excuse what he said. Ad hominem works both ways.

Uh.........me pointing out that you were wrong in referring to mils' response as "shitty and manipulative" is not ad hominem. It's pointing out that you are WRONG Scruff. If you were there, your experience and emotions would be in a completely different place. Since you weren't there, you're merely interjecting a distant opinion half way around the world. You're certainly entiled to have it, but by all means own up to it and don't belittle those of us whose opinions differ from yours. Don't dismiss mils' or anyone else from NYC who lost family and loved ones.

That day many people had to decide how they were going to die. Hmmm.....I got up this moring 9/11/2001 and took the subway to work with my coffee and bagel and I'm above the 80th floor. Now I have to decide to either jump to my death or wait for the friggin' tower to collapse to burn and crush me alive. Either way I'm never going to see my family or loved ones again; and the bonus for the day will be identifying mine from thousands of others body parts. Wow, I don't know about you, but I feel anyone from NYC gets a pass for logic when they have burning flesh, ash, jet fuel, and chemical in their lungs that just may kill them someday.


Then you're guilty of the same sort of parochial myopia that he is. The world doesn't revolve around the US; my money is that the film-makers responsible made a badly-judged attempt to shock people into caring about ecological issues, rather than doing it just to spite Americans.

Compare ecological issues to ecological issues and I'm there 1000%. Otherwise as far as backlash, criticism, and basic poor taste are concerned, the Brazilians just have to suck it up. Hope they weren't overly surprised when their brilliant advertisement was rejected. I guess there's always youtube huh????

And the WTC attack was the single deadliest terrorist attack in human history, to my knowledge. I'd still feel far more disturbed watching a video of my mother being murdered than I ever have watching footage of the planes hitting the buildings.

Did you actually use the word "feel" in a sentence?

That's the point Scruff; this stepped on people's emotions and feelings about what happened over here, especially those who live and work in NYC. You've decided within yourself what has emotional priority and so did mils. Neither of you are wrong but you're trying to assess blame to his opinion as if yours takes precedence. It does not; no one's feelings are above the others in this instance.

A lot of them probably wouldn't care, being as how a lot of them live in abject poverty (and I don't mean "social housing cheque once a month" poverty either).

Yes I'm aware of how the children are gun swept in the streets every day and I feel it's just as important as our nation being attacked. Other nations depict us as "myopic", selfish, and uncaring. Looks like they need their perception adusted as well.

I'm not even sure where to start with this...

Well, at least you're honest, but have at it......I'm all ears.........
 
What's New
9/29/25
Visit our Chat Room, free to all members, and always busy.

Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** brad1704 ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Top