Mandy Moore and Kristen Bell Wearing Very.. Revealing Gowns At Golden Globes.

[Mitchell]

Link should be the front page of.

www.etonline.com.

Then Click on the page.

Mandy Moore, and Kristen Bell , are at the Golden Globes tonight.

They are both wearing .. very revealing gowns

The gowns..are extremely low cut, and reveal, about half of their bare breasts.

Has anyone else seen or heard about this?

Thoughts?

 

[chicago]

But for real, who cares?

 

[Wolf]

Thoughts?

Yeah...what's the big deal?

 

[bethaknee]

Pretty sure celebrities/other people have been wearing low cut dresses for some time now. No big deal.

 

[happydarwin]

Every year it seems I know fewer and fewer of the names at these events.

HappyD

 

[magic fingers]

Link should be the front page of.

www.etonline.com.

Then Click on the page.

Mandy Moore, and Kristen Bell , are at the Golden Globes tonight.

They are both wearing .. very revealing gowns

The gowns..are extremely low cut, and reveal, about half of their bare breasts.

Has anyone else seen or heard about this?

Thoughts?

And ironically the event is called the Golden "Globes". But I agree, who cares?

 

[Mitchell]

It was not my intent to "Start something" with this thread.

I'm sorry I posted it.

 

[tickle gamer]

to the ones who said "Who Cares".

Mitch took the time out of his day to post this. the very least you could do is act like the post matters.

I mean, it's not something I'm into ether, but I will be nice about it.

 

[ScorpionKing]

How do you think half of the women get work in the entertainment business?

 

[Wolf]

How do you think half of the women get work in the entertainment business?

Talent?

 

[Mitchell]

Thanks, tickle gamer.

I really have been trying to keep a very low profile on here in recent times.

I don't post anything personal, or controversial.

For the most part I try to just respond to things if they are posted, and join in the discussion,

I see your point, Scorpion.

It's just.. the attire and where it was.. surprised me a little.

 

[Wolf]

to the ones who said "Who Cares".

Mitch took the time out of his day to post this. the very least you could do is act like the post matters.

I mean, it's not something I'm into ether, but I will be nice about it.

Why does it matter?
They're pretty women.
They have breasts.

It's not exactly news.

 

[llllllll]

I find both of them to be very attractive, but I'm a little confused on what either of them are trying to "reveal". They aren't exactly top-heavy, if you catch my drift. The gowns would look much better if there was a Mariana Trench squeezed between two bodacious baby buffets.

 

[tickle gamer]

Thanks, tickle gamer.

I really have been trying to keep a very low profile on here in recent times.

I don't post anything personal, or controversial.

For the most part I try to just respond to things if they are posted, and join in the discussion,

I see your point, Scorpion.

It's just.. the attire and where it was.. surprised me a little.

No problem, Mitch. I know how it feels to say something and have it talked about like it was nothing, both on here [you people know who you are], and in my own family.

 

[tickle gamer]

Why does it matter?
They're pretty women.
They have breasts.

It's not exactly news.

Well, Wolf. if you don't mind, I'm going to answer your question with a question. Why was Janet Jackson's Super Bowl thing so talked about?

 

[Wolf]

Well, Wolf. if you don't mind, I'm going to answer your question with a question. Why was Janet Jackson's Super Bowl thing so talked about?

Because it was a planned "wardrobe malfunction" specifically designed to cause a stir. And it was kind of stupid.
The "topic" of this post was two women wearing dresses at an awards show.
Most of us don't understand the pearl-clutching over it.

 

[tickle gamer]

I really have been trying to keep a very low profile on here in recent times.

I know what you mean. I've wanted to post some stuff lately, but the thought of it being turn-apart by some users [you know who you are] keeps me from posting.

 

[tickle gamer]

Because it was a planned "wardrobe malfunction" specifically designed to cause a stir. And it was kind of stupid.
The "topic" of this post was two women wearing dresses at an awards show.
Most of us don't understand the pearl-clutching over it.

How do you know it was planned? We never heard it from Janet Jackson herself.

I know what the "news" said, but until we here it form JJ's lips, we will never know for sure.

and, to that point. I can't see anyone giving up a job that pays that good, at least not giving it up like that.

 

[Wolf]

How do you know it was planned? We never heard it from Janet Jackson herself.
I know what the "news" said, but until we here it form JJ's lips, we will never know for sure.
and, to that point. I can't see anyone giving up a job that pays that good, at least not giving it up like that.

1. Because she was wearing a convenient metal "pastie" over the her nipple.
2. No one gave up any job over it.
3. This is a stupid thing to argue about.

 

[magic fingers]

Thanks, tickle gamer.

I really have been trying to keep a very low profile on here in recent times.

I don't post anything personal, or controversial.

For the most part I try to just respond to things if they are posted, and join in the discussion,

I see your point, Scorpion.

It's just.. the attire and where it was.. surprised me a little.

Mitchell, I apologize. I didn't mean to sound dismissive or rude. I thought maybe you didn't approve of what the women were wearing, but obviously I misinterpreted your post. Sorry about that.

 

[magic fingers]

Because it was a planned "wardrobe malfunction" specifically designed to cause a stir. And it was kind of stupid.
The "topic" of this post was two women wearing dresses at an awards show.
Most of us don't understand the pearl-clutching over it.

Reminds me of another bad joke;
What was the worst play call from that Super Bowl?
Justin Timberlake not going for two!
Sorry, couldn't resist.

 

[chicago]

Mitchell, I apologize. I didn't mean to sound dismissive or rude. I thought maybe you didn't approve of what the women were wearing, but obviously I misinterpreted your post. Sorry about that.

That was my interpretation too. My bad

 

[Wolf]

Reminds me of another bad joke;
What was the worst play call from that Super Bowl?
Justin Timberlake not going for two!
Sorry, couldn't resist.

Ba-doom-TISH!

 

[tickle gamer]

1. Because she was wearing a convenient metal "pastie" over the her nipple.
2. No one gave up any job over it.
3. This is a stupid thing to argue about.

In number order.

1. I saw that metal "pastie", it looked to me to be a over-the-top nipple piercing [which in the music biz, is not that unheard of] .
2. Well. All I know is I've not seen her since then [in music videos or anything]
3. I'm not arguing about it. Just a tool to make my point

 

[Wolf]

1. I saw that metal "pastie", it looked to me to be a over-the-top nipple piercing [which in the music biz, is not that unheard of].

So...you don't know, you're just guessing that it's something. Actually, the top of the bustier was designed to rip away, and the "bra" under it was just lacy trim. It was planned.
But who gives a damn? You're comparing a Super Bowl stunt to what actresses are wearing to an event.

2. Well. All I know is I've not seen her since then [in music videos or anything]

Janet Jackson's net worth is approximately $150 million. She toured last year, and will tour again this year.
Just because you don't see something, doesn't mean it's not there.
The moon might not be visible where you are right now. Does that mean it's not there?

3. I'm not arguing about it. Just a tool to make my point.

What point was that again?