• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

Should any underage material be allowed on the Theater?

Can underage material be posted?

  • No, not at all, no way. This is an adult forum, PERIOD.

    Votes: 37 38.5%
  • Only if the characters are not 'lifelike' and are only cartoon characters.

    Votes: 59 61.5%

  • Total voters
    96
Status
Not open for further replies.
You do it well enough on your own.

btw I don't own GT4. 😀 It's just been my dream car since I was about fourteen.

What's a matter? never had any childhood dreams? Might explain the pedopheliac tendencies. 😉

Honestly, I can't say my childhood dream was to own a flashy expensive penismobile.

What I really wanted when I was 14 was a functioning lightsaber, but those unfortunately don't exist. :sad:
 
Last edited:
But we are not Japanese! And I look closer to 20 than I do to 40, but I don't go around clubbing, drinking myself sick, or having sex with any breathing object, like the stereotypical 20 yo guy would do.

There is plenty of porn with real photos of Asian women who look very young, and there's nothing illegal about it. I would say the majority of Japanese animation females don't look Japanese... so... I lost my place. It's relevant though.

No, I mean *context* as in milieu.
This forum. It is meant for adults. It got a disclaimer and 18+ warning signs. It's got banners with "horny", "sexy" and so on.

It all about expectations, as Blackmagic and Ticklishgiggle put it before.
Ppl expect adult scenarios. You add kid chars, and you give them a veneer of adulthood.
You do that, you risk being called names.
Simple. Watch it happening now.

I am saying that pornography can be insidious, and can be disguised as other things. Romance novels, Mel Gibson movies, and those goddamn Precious Moments figurines don't have any sort of disclaimer or warnings, but that doesn't mean they're not doing the same thing as pornography. I can't begin to imagine the number of people who've come to treat children as objects as a result of their depiction in the media, including those damn figurines.
Not saying this is relevant to whether loli stuff should be here, but it's depressing and under-noticed.

Actually, I find art you've posted so far anything but disturbing.
What I find disturbing is, you haven't learned to trace thick lines yet.
And it is a loss cause your pics rock... but I'm rambling.

Thanks. I haven't yet decided that it's worth the time to polish my drawings carefully.

But every single one of the drawings I've posted was intended to depict non-consensual bondage of a straight woman by a lesbian, and I think in a pretty obviously sexual way. That turns lots of men and women on, but does anyone really think something like that is perfectly fine in the real world? Thankfully, it's not banned in drawings.


We should pause, and read what other ppl say.
Not gonna happen, though...

It's a gargantuan effort. It would be easier if all the obvious platitudes and banalities didn't have to be repeated. Oh well, such is human conversation.
 
Keep in mind that this discussion, as degraded as it's becoming, is about the Theater, not the United State law. The Theater is a dictatorship. Justifying your thoughts according to the US (or any other country's) law is one thing, trying to apply it in practice as per the censorship of images here is another thing.

A dictatorship which has decided that drawn images depicting minors in sexual situations will not be barred.

Sorry that your attempt at a witch-hunt thread didn't go the way you planned. 🙁
 
Honestly, I can't say my childhood dream was to own a flashy expensive penismobile.

What I really wanted when I was 14 was a functioning lightsaber, but those unfortunately didn't exist. :sad:

When I was 14 I was drawing my already well-defined fantasies, since I wasn't allowed to buy porn. Too bad I don't have any of those drawings left, the characters were definitely adults, and it'd be cool to post them.
 
Getting off to obviously underage beings=wrong!

And obviously underage, would that mean not yet able to create offspring?
Anything beyond that distinction IS a social construct. One I'm perfectly okay with, but still, NOT a fact of nature.
 
Pedophilia does not have to manifest itself in a physical act and fantasizing about children in a sexual manner is illegal, but very hard to prove (but it can be done.

William James Sidis, smartest man who ever lived:
"Rights belong to individuals, and no organisation has any rights not directly derived from those of its members as individuals; and, just as an individual's rights cannot extend to where they will trespass on another individual's rights, similarly the rights of any organisation whatever must yield to those of a single individual, whether inside or outside the organisation."
http://www.sidis.net/rights2.htm

Attempting to legislate thought is seriously a crime against humanity

It's a mental disorder and has a high success rate in treatment.

Would you seriously say that the inability to get off without being restrained, or without restraining someone else, is not a mental disorder?

apparently a child molester and a pedophile are not the same thing:

A pedophile is exclusively someone who is sexually attracted to PREADOLESCENT children.
If it's illegal to have those thoughts, then they should lock up all children who are themselves victims of molesters.
 
This is bull shit, now freaks are going to come to this forum and rub them selves over pics and vids of kids. Cartoon or not. If this is aloud then please discontinue my membership.
 
Would you seriously say that the inability to get off without being restrained, or without restraining someone else, is not a mental disorder?

Also noteworthy is the fact that homosexuality was classified as a mental disorder until 1987, when the diagnosis "ego-dystonic homosexuality" was eliminated from the revised version of the DSM-III. It is not currently present in the DSM-IV.

Furthermore, a mental disorder is only classified as such if it causes significant stress or disfunction. The fact that I like lolikon causes me neither, and as such can't even be classified as a disorder.
 
This is bull shit, now freaks are going to come to this forum and rub them selves over pics and vids of kids. Cartoon or not. If this is aloud then please discontinue my membership.

Don't let the door hit you on the way out, eh? :super_hap
 
I don't think any pictures of real human minors should be allowed on this site and that is already a rule. Check.

I also think that artwork in general should be monitored more and I'm not knocking any of the artists here. What I'm really talking about is the extreme anime/hentai on TT that depicts young children.

I believe there is a difference between artwork of 16 to 19 year olds being tickled (having their feet licked makes me uncomfortable, but enough hairs are being split already) while fully clothed and artwork of 6 to 15 year old little anime girls naked, bound, sweating and being tickled and or licked. And there are pics just like that on TT and I know some anime/hentai fans would get mad if they had to go, but they are just too extreme in my opinion.

That stuff is for the ATF (anime tickling forum) if you got to put it somewhere on the Internet at all.

The only artwork of 6 to 15 year olds that I think should be able to slide (and I mean barely slide) is if they are fully clothed and tickled. Basically Nessie's artwork, but as soon as nudity and licking is involved it becomes too extreme.

And just so everybody knows, I'm trying to be nice here. I would be fine if all 17 and under artwork had to go because like Umojar said if you want to see tickling pics of the Teen Titans or "insert female young adult cartoon character here", the artist can just draw them older. In the DC comics Starfire and Raven are both at least 18 now. They've been around since the 80's.

So that is my idea of somewhat of a compromise. I mean come guys. I've seen a pic on here of Pan from Dragonball GT being tickled and you can see her freakin nipple. She is in the 6 to 15 range. I say let artwork of young adults stay because artists can just draw them a couple years older, like Umojar and his Teen Titans artwork. And if you got to let some kind of 6 to 15 artwork stay then it has to be no nudity and no licking, like Nessie's stuff and again that is letting something barely slide in my opinion.
 
Last edited:
Video companies who advertise their clips as teen tickling or cheerleader tickling should be banned as well, because they are attempting to portray a sexual scene in a young manner. Yes its known they are 18 because they have the benefit of a legal notice, but how do we not know the cheerleaders arent playing a high school character? Yes colleges have cheerleaders but its more dominant in HS. Hell, bring it on is tech a movie about high school cheerleadin
 
Special Problems with Sexual Abuse Cases said:
“Although the terms are often used interchangeably, a distinction must be made between ‘sex offender against a minor’ and ‘pedophile’. The former refers to a criminal sexual behavior and the latter to an anomalous sexual preference. Many pedophiles never act on their impulses. At the same time, not all sex offenders against a minor are pedophiles.”

As I said, being a paedophile does not make me a monster who wishes to harm kids for my own pleasure. What it means is that I am preternaturally attracted towards children (by attracted, I mean sexually AND romantically as well), and it is because of this attraction that I would *never* harm a child for any reason.

While most child molesters are paedophiles and are sexually attracted to children, they certainly by no means love children. If they did love them, they wouldn't harm them so readily, eh?

I don't see this as a mental disorder, it's just another facet of my personality, like anything else. As that quote above says, it can be considered an "anomalous" or abnormal sexual preference. It's not doing anyone else any harm, it doesn't do me any harm....so please, kindly save the therapy for someone who needs it. 😀
 
So this whole topic isn't about a few peoples business becoming other peoples business? I SO did not know that! Thanks so much for showing me the light. <_<

I was more directing that statement at what you said rather than what this thread is about. If people get off to that stuff, then they get off to that stuff. That is their personal business. The topic isn't about that, although I thought I'd throw that out there anyway.

Why so much hate in here? Zeratul has done nothing wrong but admit to looking at lolicon. Then we've got the morality police and their families prodding him with spears, holding torches and screaming angry things!
Save your energy for when he actually does something wrong.
 
My point was that images of children on a sexual site do not bode well for those users who use the site for legal means.

Good point. Most people here view material which is legal. Things like cartoons and anime throw a wrench into the clockwork and things go from simple to complicated with fictional, animated characters.

Artists can make excuses for age. It doesn't matter. If they look like kids the risk is no less just because you say so, and the material is no less a liability. If we start splitting hairs about what type of child-looking pictures are ok and what types aren't, and what specific age group is ok, and what isn't, when they're ALL really young anyways, just makes this stupid and needlessly complicated. Thats also a form of bias towards art style as well, which is, ironically, what loli supporters don't like being done to them, yet whats being proposed by others in making exceptions for some things is no better.

Most people who use this site legally are viewing material that is legal. They have a reasonable expectation to be safe here and that material which imposes any kind of danger is not allowed. These are adult men and women, couples, and people with families.

Its important to point out that many of these loli/underage anime drawers and fans are teens, young adults, or underage themselves. They identify with younger characters more so than adult characters, and they live out their fantasies through these younger characters. Let alone, thats fine. But when you attach fetishism to the topic and you put it on an adult-only board, it takes on a new nature and their presense and their interest contradicts itself and takes a site from operating well within the law, to walking on the line of it just by the addition of their material alone. Thats how hazardess it is.

I didn't see any artwork problems until anime came on the scene in this community. This whole issue, in this topic, really can be targeted on the anime style. There are more and more younger people joining sites like TMF and TT these days. Many of them are not supposed to be here, and when they see their favorite anime characters drawn with their fetish in mind, they stay. When they see there are artists willing to draw their favorites, regardless of age, they're hooked.

For those don't understand why anime characters are so young, allow me to explain something (I've done this several times), but its always worth it:

In Japan, a girl is considered coming of age at 14. Here it's 16. In the japanese culture children are pushed into independance sooner and faster than in other cultures. More is expected of them sooner, and so they are made to be more mature for their age.

This cultural ideal flows into anime too. This is why most anime series revolve around a young character either coming of age or making their way in the world. It focuses on them specifically, as opposed to any adults, because the creators want to hook younger viewers, yes, but it also does it to show this cultural ideal that young japanese people will blossom into strong adults with integrity. Many anime series are coming of age stories, and most characters are 14-16, and supporting characters are usually barely legal themselves. The adults are shadowy figures that we never really see often, and the kids are made to look like they're running their lives on their own and they're fully functional.

Many series don't stress the importance of parental or adult support or adult respect, and many show the parents as these bumbling bafoons and that their children have it together better than they do. To then sell this to an impressionable preteen or young teen makes perfect sense because an anime fan is likely to identify with some of those things. The characters are made to look more mature for their age and adult and responsible, and this leads to adult qualities being put into a nubile who hasn't even lived yet. The problem with that, is it eliminates the desire to draw then any older. Teen fans figure they don't need to draw them older because they've already adult. Problem is the body doesn't match. Teens are trying to be more than they're called to be, and this is a trend in anime also.

The problem is that the japanese have so engrained the idea of younger, younger, younger, on the characters they create that even western artists who mimick the style carry over this sentiment as well. This then filters down to the fanartists.

Slap a fetish and adult website on it, and you can see how the japanese influence effects this. Really, any artist could choose to draw characters as 23, 31, 50+ years old. But they don't. They're caught up in this adolesent, preteen, nubile, I'm mature for my age and take care of myself I'm so cool, characters. They identify with the 14-18 age group because thats where they are themselves. In cases where they're older (in my case 24) then theres less excuse for drawing younger characters by impulse, since you've moved on and grown past that stage.

Its the people who don't grow out of the desire to draw younger characters or create younger characters who impose in the problem. Its almost like they're stuck in a Peter Pan Neverland sort of thing. They're growing, but the characters aren't. They see people like us as the Captain Hooks of the world, trying to ruin their fun.

We're not. Having young characters isn't a problem. But making them all young characters, and then having those characters and/or the adults (which is even worse) doing fetish things to eachother just isn't right on a site like this. They need to start respecting that this is an adult website for adult material, which doesn't involve or concern itself with underage material of a tickling or fetish nature.

The arguement has been too far and long and way too interpretive than it needs to be. Its as simple as this being an adult website. That theres a struggle to keep the material adult is sad.

Alot of people bash the TMF for things it has done, or hasn't done. Well, I have to say, they've got this particular issue better under control than this site does, and we need to follow that example before people start resenting eachother.

The younger people need to respect that this is an adult website for older people with adult fetishes and adult situations. They need to accept the fact their their anime fetish pictures undermind the nature of the site and delute the line of whats acceptable with the japanese influenced taboos and nubile themes. The increasing ammount of younger and younger members on TT, compared to TMF, is noticable. If we want to nip this in the bud we need to put our foot down like TMF did.

How that foot goes down may be different, but something needs to happen. I don't like it when topics like this come to an end, people calm down, people lose their fervor and just go back to business as usual as if we're not taking this seriously and we're just talking just to talk. We're bound to repeat this, and its far too easy to just let this calm down. We all know what will happen if we just let this calm down and let it drop. Its far too tempting to let that happen and just put off a solution for a later date. Thats what the opposition would want. "Ah, lets just let them get the moral victory, things will calm down and it will be back to business as usual until the next big debate. The mods will say they'll look into it, but we know they probably won't follow through, and we're safe for another few months"

No. We've got to do something about that. Obviously, we're just online, typing away on a computer. The only things we can do are post, type, and complain. Those are the only three things we can only do. Its our only tool, and we need to use it more often, not just when we're roused to action by a little poll or the world loli gets thrown around.

Thats not proactive, thats reactive. We shouldn't be reacting, we should be acting.
 
Last edited:
Hey D

There's a couple holes in your very, very lengthy argument there, and here they are:

1. Drawn, non-photorealistic depictions of minors engaging in sexual acts (most law enforcement agencies wouldn't consider foot-licking or tickling to be a sexual act) are completely and totally legal in the United States where TT is based. That includes pretty much all lolikon content.

2. Far as I know, the administration here at TT really doesn't intend to do anything about this percieved problem.

If you don't like that, you can try to weasel your way into moderator status and change policy yourself, continue to complain and continue to watch nothing happen, learn to ignore things you don't like, or even (GASP) just go away.

The choice is yours.
 
Hey D

There's a couple holes in your very, very lengthy argument there, and here they are:

1. Drawn, non-photorealistic depictions of minors engaging in sexual acts (most law enforcement agencies wouldn't consider foot-licking or tickling to be a sexual act) are completely and totally legal in the United States where TT is based. That includes pretty much all lolikon content.

2. Far as I know, the administration here at TT really doesn't intend to do anything about this percieved problem.

If you don't like that, you can try to weasel your way into moderator status and change policy yourself, continue to complain and continue to watch nothing happen, learn to ignore things you don't like, or even (GASP) just go away.

The choice is yours.

I've been reading most of the posts here, including yours, so what you're saying is really just a repeat to me, and I don't have anything to say about it, that I haven't already to other people.

I'm interested in hearing something new or different, and you're not providing it. So, you're just wasting your time with me.
 
I've been reading most of the posts here, including yours, so what you're saying is really just a repeat to me, and I don't have anything to say about it, that I haven't already to other people.

I'm interested in hearing something new or different, and you're not providing it. So, you're wasting your with me.

Which basically proves that you're reading things, but you aren't LISTENING. :shocked:
 
Hey D
1. Drawn, non-photorealistic depictions of minors engaging in sexual acts (most law enforcement agencies wouldn't consider foot-licking or tickling to be a sexual act) are completely and totally legal in the United States where TT is based. That includes pretty much all lolikon content.
2. Far as I know, the administration here at TT really doesn't intend to do anything about this percieved problem.
If you don't like that, you can try to weasel your way into moderator status and change policy yourself, continue to complain and continue to watch nothing happen, learn to ignore things you don't like, or even (GASP) just go away.
Sorry guy, but "D" is a moderator already, and while longwinded, admins won't dismiss his opinion all too easily.

...

Besides, I don't like this "you don't like, you leave" attitude much.
First, we've been here for longer, so being a veteran has some perks.
Second, if we have to bear with loli contents, you can bear with "D"''s essays.

...

Seriously, WHAT THE F*CK!?
I joined TTC as an adult in 2003, expecting an adult site, and it's been flooded with kids and teen-whatever chars over the last year.

I don't mind minorities, even vocal ones, but please, pause and think thoroughly before inviting a senior member to leave.

...

And about admins not wanting to act... keep up this "tough guy talk" of yours, and you can bet mister "D" over there is going to do something about that.

...

Gee! Calm down everybody.
 
Which basically proves that you're reading things, but you aren't LISTENING. :shocked:

You say that I am not listening, because whats coming out of my mouth is not what you want to hear.

I don't know about you, but last year when I said you and I were even and square and that I'm not going to be angry with you over anything, and that I didn't want to start or end the year that way, I meant that. And, so far, I've lived up to my word. You can do whatever you want. In fact, I'm the least of your concerns here. You've seem to have aqquired a group of people in this very thread who are angry with you. So, go be angry with them. Its just as I said on ATF: Trouble finds trouble.
 
Sorry guy, but "D" is a moderator already, and while longwinded, admins won't dismiss his opinion all too easily.

...

Besides, I don't like this "you don't like, you leave" attitude much.
First, we've been here for longer, so being a veteran has some perks.
Second, if we have to bear with loli contents, you can bear with "D"''s essays.

...

Seriously, WHAT THE F*CK!?
I joined TTC as an adult in 2003, expecting an adult site, and it's been flooded with kids and teen-whatever chars over the last year.

I don't mind minorities, even vocal ones, but please, pause and think thoroughly before inviting a senior member to leave.

...

And about admins not wanting to act... keep up this "tough guy talk" of yours, and you can bet mister "D" over there is going to do something about that.

...

Gee! Calm down everybody.

Please don't defend me, Kalamos. I appriciate it, I really do, but it makes it look as though I've done something wrong here, and you are smart enough to know I haven't and so is everyone else. I'm not getting in anyone's face here, and everyone whose read my posts can see that. I'm not screaming and I'm not hollaring, and I'm certainly not calling people pedophiles and such.

He just said something presumptious about me, the staff, and the site. Its a mistake, but not a crime.
 
Please don't defend me, Kalamos. It makes it look as though I've done something wrong here, and you are smart enough to know I haven't and so is everyone else.
...
He just said something presumptious about me, the staff, and the site. Its a mistake, but not a crime.

I'm not defending YOU.
I am defending myself as well.

...

Besides, they are not even reading you, so your attacks lack poignancy.
Thrust deep.
Three words will suffice.

We won't leave.

There. Easy. Period.
Now somebody please have mercy on us, and stop this nonsense with those nice and shiny mod tools.

:umm:
 
He just said something presumptious about me, the staff, and the site. Its a mistake, but not a crime.

It was presumptuous of me to point out that you're strutting around here like you run the place?

Because I know you're not a moderator and don't control anything beyond your little artist forum.

There's no question of what I want to hear or not. I'm just stating what's obvious. You can either keep complaining to no avail, shut your mouth and ignore policy you disagree with, or go somewhere like TT, which has a policy you agree with.
 
Because I know you're not a moderator and don't control anything beyond your little artist forum.
There's no question of what I want to hear or not. I'm just stating what's obvious. You can either keep complaining to no avail, shut your mouth and ignore policy you disagree with, or go somewhere like TT, which has a policy you agree with.
As I mentioned before, while I don't care much about Vlad - you can punch him to you heart's content - I find the whole "you don't like, you leave" idea a *tiny* bit offensive.

I am pointing out that rules are also shaped by customs.
Admins want to keep discontent to a minimum, but loli-fans are still a minority group.

If they become more trouble than they are worth, admins will be forced to change rules, and then you'll have to abide them.

So, please, ponder your words.
Just because admins won't act, doesn't mean they agree with you.
And there is no need to be rude to Vlad. That's really uncool.
Go find somebody your own size, you bully. 😉
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
What's New

4/26/2025
Check out Clips4Sale for the webs largest one-stop fetish clip store!
Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** brad11701 ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Back
Top