I don't think you did address the issue of intent really. You made the point that people can still be offended but as I said, people can be offended regardless. If offense isn't intended and someone is still offended, that doesn't automatically make it wrong. An elderly person may be offended by the sight of a gay couple holding hands or kissing in public. That doesn't mean it is an offensive act.
As for men defending his use of the term, I don't actually see it as a male vs female issue. I would argue the same point if the situation was reversed (i.e. 'my boys'). I just think people are too quick to read offensiveness into every little thing, and to politicise comments which may have no other context.
If there were an untapped market of (paying) female customers then that would only be a good thing for producers since it would open up many more potential sales - I just don't see any evidence that there is. I don't deny that plenty of women watch and enjoy porn, but I don't see them paying for it in anything like the same numbers that men do. Commercial porn exists in it's many forms due to market forces. If people like something and are willing to pay for it then sooner or later it will get made. An enthusiast will produce the content they want to see and the audience will start to buy it, making it a viable business. Arguably, there are less gay men (and probably less gay tickling fans) than there are women, and yet gay men account for the majority of the M/M tickling audience - hence there are several gay tickling sites and stores. It succeeds even though the majority of straight men probably have no interest in it. However, I don't know of any M/M, F/M, M/F, or F/F sites that are run by female producers specifically for a female market.
The direction of porn is dictated by economics and viewing stats, not by some chauvinistic strangle-hold that the men have over the industry. There is literally nothing to stop any female (such as yourself or others on this forum) from producing their own videos, targeted at female tickling fans. You have access to all the same resources that a male producer has on starting out.
I think I did address intent, as you paraphrased what I said. And furthermore, just because someone is offended doesn't mean the offender has to give a shit. I'm just a name on a screen like anyone else. I figured someone trying to make money in the world would choose how they express themselves publicly (or in terms of this forum anyway) in a careful manner. If they don't want to, that's fine too, but I might still comment.
I don't think there are less male gay tickle fans than there are female tickle fans as proven by your point mentioning sales as well as multiple sites and stores that appeal to them. Even a pretty well-known documentary called Tickled.... ABOUT MEN. I think most don't post here due to TMF's reputation of flaming m/m fans in the past despite trying to tout themselves as the "Flame-Free Forum" for a time.
I don't know where you would determine that I have the same resources as some hypothetical person you made up for that weird point. Either way, even the female producers again appeal to ... MEN! xD
The side panel...all tits and toes. I don't even think there has ever been an F/M pic of the week in my entire membership. I could be wrong because I'm sure I haven't seen every single one, but these are just a few examples of the boring, same-old same-old, not necessarily chauvinistic, but pretty exclusively geared to straight male lers.
I'll let another dude mansplain to me how I'm wrong tho.