HiddenFruit
TMF Poster
- Joined
- Dec 27, 2011
- Messages
- 75
- Points
- 0
Well, "plenty" is relative, I think. I see a few names, and lesser consistent names (like rhiannon. Hey gurl, 'sup? We should chat! JK) But at least I see them. It gives me hope. Freethought has the right idea though, I think.
Ooh! JoePTickle brings up something else I considered last night after I made my post: Moderators! Well, of the female variety. Having women leadership helps, but only if they take an active role. Now, I have no idea what the site used to be like, so I don't know if the increase of women on here is due to actual proactive changes on here, or just the natural trend of increased women users on the web. At the moment, I think it's the latter. Here's the thing though: you say we have three, but out of how many?
Not to rain down on the point or anything, but from what I've learned of the origins of the site, the male-orientation makes sense. If the women's leadership were actually the majority, or even on par... would we really be having this discussion?
Any moderators feel free to correct or enlighten me, but these are my personal opinions from what I've seen.
P.S On a different note, something else I realized while writing this post: remember what I said about ads and subtle influences of behavior, and the first impression of the site?
Well, I KNOW this wasn't on purpose, and I'm pretty sure a lot of people are going to look at me funny for this, but it's something I have to mention: anyone else notice that the main color scheme for this website is blue?
Blue. Think about it for a second.
Get it yet?
If you change to pink borders, you might have a better chance of getting the girls.
Ooh! JoePTickle brings up something else I considered last night after I made my post: Moderators! Well, of the female variety. Having women leadership helps, but only if they take an active role. Now, I have no idea what the site used to be like, so I don't know if the increase of women on here is due to actual proactive changes on here, or just the natural trend of increased women users on the web. At the moment, I think it's the latter. Here's the thing though: you say we have three, but out of how many?
Not to rain down on the point or anything, but from what I've learned of the origins of the site, the male-orientation makes sense. If the women's leadership were actually the majority, or even on par... would we really be having this discussion?
Any moderators feel free to correct or enlighten me, but these are my personal opinions from what I've seen.
P.S On a different note, something else I realized while writing this post: remember what I said about ads and subtle influences of behavior, and the first impression of the site?
Well, I KNOW this wasn't on purpose, and I'm pretty sure a lot of people are going to look at me funny for this, but it's something I have to mention: anyone else notice that the main color scheme for this website is blue?
Blue. Think about it for a second.
Get it yet?
If you change to pink borders, you might have a better chance of getting the girls.