• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • Check out Tickling.com - the most innovative tickling site of the year.
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

Why is the American flag offensive to some?

Just a short revisit to this thread.Locally a certain company flies a large American flag above its grounds.There is some controversy,as a certain group finds this flag offensive,and it is getting letters to the editor in the paper.The group.....Jehovahs witnesses,the same ones who act like it's their birthright to traipse onto your property and damn near have to be forced off.The paper link is
www.butlereagle.com.Hope it works.
 
PC is an oxymoron

The united states has a flag, it is a symbol to many both here and abroad, and perhaps another country would have just cause to be offended by it, but HERE, if you don't like it LEAVE.
I could see what the original intention of "separation of church and state" was, and it would be unfair to impose a national religion on all of us... BUT, thanks to the liberal PC fairies, they want to (and are having success) rewrite the phrase to be, more broadly "separation of faith and state".
PC is a liberal disease that afflicts us all, If George Washington was the head of a PC government back then, our flag would still be the Union Jack (no offense meant to our friends in the UK🙄 ).
I have a flag on the front porch, and it's been there since I bought the house (over 10 years now, i'm not a "9/11 patriot")... if anyone told me to take it down, they'd get a decidedly non PC response.
I don't agree with everything the USA goes along with... NAFTA almost ruined my life when 15 years seniority gets an "oh well, too bad" response from a company that then ships my whole factory to mexico, what RETARD thought NAFTA up?... BUT, that would never sway my admiration for "Old Glory" and all she stands for.
here's my response to the PC fairies...

1. NAFTA sucks, they should CLOSE the borders until ALL Americans have jobs, and THEN open up the gates. USA shouldn't just be the land of opportunity for foreigners!
2. Abortion IS murder and F**k you for using MY tax dollars to pay for it... They should just sterilize everybody and make them apply for a Parent's licence. (think of it, no more crack babies, and no more abortion industry)
3. ENGLISH is the language here... I'm Irish, should I petition the schools to include Gaelic in the curriculum??? I think not.
4. I don't own a gun, but it's not MY place to tell you that you can't.
5. If I can't punish my kids.. then DON'T fine ME if they don't go to class. (that was on the news... can you imagine?)
6. The ONLY bad thing about the death penalty is the long delay between conviction and execution... what kind of deterrent is a 40 year wait?
and finally...

7. I don't particularly care if 1 thru 6 offend anyone, it's my opinion and I'm proud to live in a country where I can state my opinion, AND I respect that others have their own opinions and are free to voice them... and therein lies the tragic flaw of PC... they try to inflict their opinions on you and they use the laws to do it, that's not right.

If you don't like the brave new PC world, kindly complain to the nearest ELECTED liberal, or better yet... VOTE next time.
 
Ummm...LONG post.......

Wow...ok so I wanna say something. Anyone surprised at that little fact? hehe

Point A - I agree about symbology. Before we had written words, we had symbols for events of the world. That being said, the flag stands for ALL of America. It's not just a symbol of that which is written in our laws. It is a symbol of our constitution, our tax law, Bill CLinton, George Bush, our school systems, our local McDonalds, the World Trade Center, NAFTA, our prosperity as perceived by the rest of the world, the hungry children in the poverty stricken areas of every state, Native American reservations, the ugly history of the South, the Florida Keys and the people who vacation there, Timothy McVeigh, Mark Twain, the Mississippi River, the Grand Canyon, American military in other countries, the US Olympic teams....and the list goes on and on. THAT is why some people find it offensive. Our flag, Old Glory, is a symbol of America, good and bad. Now, as to whether or not it should be restricted. Perhaps it should if it offends within the borders of ANOTHER country. I doubt we would argue that point. Within the border of the United States, it should fly. Why? It is the flag of the United States of America. That's why. That is my opinion.

Point B - I've little education about Irish history. I'm currently on the mend in that situation. It's interesting the things that form our bias in thought. As Red and others point out...they have years of expereince in dealing with unrest, so I defer to this thought about flag waving that stirs the emotions associtated with violence within a country.

Point C - (This relates some personal experience, be froewarned you may disagree. 🙂 ) As most of you all know, I'm a Southerner. I was born and raised in Mississippi. I've seen the debate of flags and their offensive nature up close. I've lived all over this beautiful state and have seen the reasons for and against the removal of a flag. I've lived in areas where I, as a white female, have been the majority and at other times, the minority. I've seen racism (which is at the heart of the flag controversy in the South) rear its ugly head. I've been victim to it in being refused service at a gas station in a small town because the black man who was the proprietor didn't need "the money of some white bitch." This was on the day a pro-flag rally was held. I have seen rednecks brag about KKK meetings and cover their cars in "Confederate Battle Flags" along with hate filled bumper stickers. I have also seen the same flag be used to demean women of all races on more than one occasion. I've also seen the multitude of races (White, Black, Choctaw, Vietnamese, and Cajun to name a few which are prominant here) have the intelligence and heart to say, "It's a symbol of good and bad. How people choose to use it is their business." It's sad. There is more to the South than hatred. There is more than what was here 40 years ago. The flag being flown is a reminder of the past. But it can also be a reminder of change. As it flew over that as well. I see a different South than most. I live it daily. I see the good and the bad....and the bad getting better. I agree with Q and Strel, problems yes, but perhaps my son will see this portion of the country through his own eyes, rather than the remebering eyes of those who pre-judge because it isn't perfect yet. I seriously doubt that any area is free of predjudice, but perhaps our longing to hold onto (in the form of a flag) history that has such horrible evil and such lovely blessings somehow damns us as a region. OK, enough rambling on that one...just thought I'd toss in there a little snippet about how a flag can be see and used for purposes beyond it's creative intent.

Point D - For those of you who never thought of the lyrics beyond the ones we sing at football games, the following is the whole Star Spangled Banner. It mentions a "God" and I choose to insert my equal thought there as I'm sure "One's personal belief in the spiritual realms and the undecided thoughts of others" was just too many words and wouldn't rhyme. 🙂 All kidding aside, it's lovely sentiment from a man who felt moved to write it based on his love and his values. I choose to respect that. I get a little lump in my throat when I read it..and I think about it. Just thought I'd share.


The Star Spangled Banner
Lyrics by Francis Scott Key

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh, say, can you see,
by the dawn's early light,
what so proudly we hailed,
at the twilight's last gleaming?
Whose broad stripes and bright stars,
thro' the perilous fight,
o'er the ramparts we watched,
were so gallantly streaming?
And the rockets red glare,
the bombs bursting in air,
gave proof thro' the night,
that our flag was still there.
Oh, say does that star-spangled banner yet wave,
o'er the land of the free,
and the home of the brave?


On the shore dimly seen,
thro' the mists of the deep,
where thee foe's haughty host,
in dread silence reposes,
what is that which the breeze,
o'er the towering steep,
as it fitfully blows,
half conceals, half discloses?
Now it catches the gleam,
of the morning's first beam,
in full glory reflected.,
now shines in the stream.
"Tis the star-spangled banner;
Oh, long may it wave,
o'er the land of the free,
and the home of the brave."


And where is that band,
who so vauntingly swore,
that the havoc of war,
and the battle's confusion,
a home and a country,
should leave us no more?
Their blood was washed out,
their foul footstep's pollution,
no refuge could save,
the hireling and slave,
from the terror of flight,
or the gloom of the grave,
and thee star-spangled banner,
in triumph doth wave,
o'er the land of the free,
and the home of the brave.


Oh, thus be it ever,
when free man shall stand,
between their loved homes,
and war's desolation,
blest with vict'ry and peace,
may the Heav'n rescued land,
praise the Pow'r that hath made,
and preserved us a nation!
Then conquer we must,
when our cause it is just;
and this be our motto;
"in God is our trust!"
And the star-spangled banner,
in triumph shall wave,
o'er the land of the free,
and the home of the brave.

And wow, if you are still reading, I'm impressed. :wow: thanks for taking the time.

Jo...who digs Old Glory.....and apologizes for the typos. Hope uyou could decode em. 😉
 
Dont be too impressed....i read the first 3 sentences then skipped to the last 2. but i'm reletively sure it was a great post...and long..whew...😛
 
I'm starting to think that Mr Prime just likes to tease me abit. 😉Doesn't he know that is a dangerous thing?

JoBelle
 
i'm kind of fearless like that. 🙂

but seriously..nice post. (i broke down and read the whole thing)
 
Just saw the O'Reilly factor tonight.It seems that the IOC objected to the flying of the WTC flag..the one damaged on 9/11.I guess they got too much flack and backed off,but just who in the hell do they think they are telling us if we can fly that particular flag or not?
They claimed that they wanted the olympics to be nonpolitical,but a look at olympic history can show that for years they weren't close.
Again...it's our flag,if you have a problem with it...LEAVE.
 
Envy, jealously.

Although some see it represent...Greed.
While they may have a point there....their sight is mis guided as the Stars and stripes are not symbolic of what actually goes ON but how we got to where we are....Free and UNITED.

Greed is a seperate disease within.

TTD
 
ForgottenTcklr said:
I don't want to sound harsh, but any American who has a problem with America just shouldn't be here. Why not just move to a country you like better?

Please don't confuse intelligent criticism with dislike. It is possible to love one's country without loving everything the country does.

Some people may have problems with America, but I imagine the reason is that they want those problems to be resolved so that the country they love will be even greater.
 
There's a difference between dissent and carping. The latter is what we're mostly seeing now from our critics.

The anti-war left, and elite opinion in Europe, tried to blame America for 9/11 with the "root cause" argument. They lost. They gleefully predicted that our Afghan war would turn into a quagmire. They were wrong there too. They said that Islamic opinion would be inflamed against us. Instead, we're seeing respect (and more than a little fear) of our strength.

What's left? Rights-speak. We're bad guys because some of our bombs missed and killed civilians, and because we're allegedly mistreating a gang of cut-throats in Cuba. Never mind that some of our supposed victims imprisoned or killed far more of their own people than we ever did: men whose beards were too short, or women whose ankles showed under the hem of the mail sacks they had to wear. Never mind that others were party to the murder of 3,000 of our fellow citizens. But barbarians get a free pass from the lefties.

Strelnikov
 
Axis of Evil!

Good evening Strel! Yup...the war that was going to drag on forever was instead a demonstration of what superior air strength can do to ANY opposition, even a mountainous one. If you can't establish supply lines or move troops, there really isn't a lot to do except wait for us or run..... Q
 
Give me a break

As one of the self-proclaimed "lefties," I find the jingoistic and politically-tinged remarks of Strel and P.H. Tickler and others incredibly offensive, if not outright idiotic.

* I am "anti-war" -- but I am 100% behind our country in our current war. I realize that war is an absolutely necessary response to the current situation, but I don't *prefer* that the war go on forever. Do you?

* I don't "blame America" for what happened, but I *do* seek to understand the reasons why the terrorists struck America. Do you see no merit whatsoever in trying to understand your enemy? Do you prefer an endless cycle of 'eye-for-an-eye' bloodshed to an ultimately peaceful resolution? If so, move to Israel, because that's what's happening there.

* The "we/they" mentality espoused in your posts -- suggesting taht only the right are true American citizens and that the left ought to 'love it or leave it' -- is, in a word, sickening. We are *all* Americans. Republicans, Democrats, Independants, and others. In fact, you should realize that there are many more "lefties" than "righties," and that we're not all treasonous, brain-washed, drug-taking, abortion-demanding, welfare-receiving, draft-dodging, flag-burning, commie-sympathizing degenerates. I hate to be the one to break it to you, but the 'left' includes many thoughtful, patriotic human beings that work for a living, pay taxes, and just happen to see the world differently than you do.

* Yes -- I'm a "leftie". But I DON'T give a pass to barbarians; and I resent the suggestion that, because I'm not a member of the GOP or a card-carrying NRA member, that I do. Do *you* give a pass to ANYBODY that deigns to hold beliefs that differ from yours in the arenas of politics or religion? It doesn't seem like it. Don't lump the left in with the terrorists, when, in fact, your absolutist, tolerate-no-dissent attitude makes your beliefs a lot closer to fascism than those of the left. That you believe in your heart of hearts that you -- and you alone -- hold the truth does not make it so.

Sorry, but I had to insert some shades of gray into your black/white worldview. I'm going to go build a bunker now, and wait for the inevitable conservative back-lash.
 
Noise, smoke and drama...

Well, I'm somewhere between (Strel& Shark) and (MN & Hal) in political/ideological "leanings", so I'm going to jump in here and throw myself open to smackdown from BOTH poles...lol. I tend to be independent of party affiliation depending on the issue, and although you may find Strel sounding militaristic and ultraconservative at times, he doesn't "preach" what you seem to be implying about differing viewpoints, but rather defends his own positions vigorously as is his right, without resorting to "love it or leave it" dramatic statements of that sort. He is CRANKY and at times intolerant, but I have a feeling you could trust him to water your plants and feed your dog. 🙂

MN, you obviously are a well meaning citizen who has concerns about the role of the USA in the world, as does nearly every thoughful person during this war/crisis. The controversy about the flag and its meaning to various groups is an ongoing discussion that encompasses most recognizable symbols at some point in history. You bring up some good points about the stereotypes that are foisted upon "lefties", but don't acknowledge the seeds of truth within many of the problems you used to denigrate the "righty" position. Nonetheless, you have passion and as much right to display it as anyone else in the country!

It's a noisy smoky time in our country at the moment..emotions are running high and hard, but overall I think we're going to come through this era in good shape, and perhaps with a bit better perspective of what the rest of the world is upset about, although it may not be anything we wish to acknowledge or change within our society.

Guess this doesn't really resolve anything....lol..but I hate seeing these things escalate into solidfied positions that leave no room for discussion and chatting!
:wow: Q
 
One might consider that those who do not give passes to barbarians, are not abortion-demanding,are not draft-dodging,are not flag-burning,
and are not communist sympathizers are not as far left as they think.
As far as numbers,left and right would need standard definitions to accomplish this type of census.With a politically diverse society,that would be pretty close to impossible except for the extremes that have been discussed in these posts.
 
Re: Give me a break

MN Tikl said:
As one of the self-proclaimed "lefties," I find the jingoistic and politically-tinged remarks of Strel and P.H. Tickler and others incredibly offensive, if not outright idiotic.

Offended? over words on a forum? as if!
had you paid attention, you would have read the following...
7. I don't particularly care if 1 thru 6 offend anyone, it's my opinion and I'm proud to live in a country where I can state my opinion, AND I respect that others have their own opinions and are free to voice them... and therein lies the tragic flaw of PC... they try to inflict their opinions on you and they use the laws to do it, that's not right.

I'm glad you get to express your opinion as freely... the big difference here is that I am NOT offended by your views... offense to opinions is a liberal thing😀

cheers
 
give me a break, redux

"offense to opinions is a liberal thing"

Once again, give me a break.

If my opinion didn't offend you, then you wouldn't have wasted your time posting a response to it.

Don't try to take the high road re: taking offense. It undermines whatever credibility you have left.

Cheers
 
Re: give me a break, redux

MN Tikl said:
"offense to opinions is a liberal thing"

Once again, give me a break.

If my opinion didn't offend you, then you wouldn't have wasted your time posting a response to it.

Don't try to take the high road re: taking offense. It undermines whatever credibility you have left.

Cheers

maybe I have misread something, but weren't you the one offended? I responded because you chose to use my screen name in your post.😉

*P.H. Tickler gives MN Tikl a break*

BTW, what kind of credibility do you think I'm going for with a name like P.H. Tickler?🙂
 
IMO, offence to opinions is not a prerogative of liberals or conservatives. It's simply a sign for intolerance, inherent to all fanatics of whatever political (or religious) color. Both ultra-conservatives AND far-left liberals are excellent examples for that. And most of them will state eagerly that they'll fight for the freedom of opinions...

But I think those people who REALLY defend freedom are found somewhere between both extremes. Many are extremely tolerant, and they don't need to accuse each other of extreme positions. Just my personal view.
 
I had a prof who once told me his theories of the right and left....I found them enlightening and humorous, and I won't go into them all here. **you're welcome**😛

BUT, one thought has stuck with me for years...Conservatives? Liberals? This isn't a linear way of thinking. It's circular. When you get too far left, you start to merge to the thinking of the right and vice versa. Food for thought, no?

Jo, who treats it like a giant trampoline and I jump all over the damn place 🙂
 
In reply to Jobelle,to me it's definitely linear.I don't subscribe to overcomplicated trains of thought as many college professors do. There are plenty of things in the world that do not require massive studies and philosophical oversight.To me this professor had more success confusing the issue than anything.
I have an acquaintance who took some math course which taught that
1+1 did not necessarily equal 2.Try that with your checkbook,work figures,or making change and you'll understand what I mean.Taking your lead,though,I won't get any deeper into examples of everyday thought being overcomplicated,overstudied,or made to fit certain trains of thought.
 
Shark

LOL...I think most profs I knew were like that. This one however, I must say, he was a brilliant man. Likely my favorite over the years. He was a historian *Which may explain his thoughts from the previous post.* 😉

He also said something once that I found true...He didn't teach history the wasy it WAS. He taught history the way he THOUGHT it was.*LOTS of texts...from multiple cultures for this class* ha!History, the story of the human race, is nothing if not subjective. You can't label it with one definition suitable to all. No matter which side of the coin you think you're on, in the eyes of someone more or less conservative, you're on the edge. IMO, This relates to the whole flag issue as well as the tangent being discussed right now.

Jo
 
Do a smackdown on Q? Opinionated? Intolerant? Moi? Come on, Q, you can't light a fire without striking sparks. Stirring a bowl of mush just doesen't get it.

As usual, MN didn't devote much attention to reading my post before he replied. I said "the ANTI-WAR left, and ELITE OPINION in Europe." This country has a tradition of liberal warriors: Harry Truman, to name just one. Hal can probably find better examples among Europeans than I can, but Tony Blair certainly qualifies.

That said, there's an unfortunate tendency among many on the left and in Europe to regard all uses of American military power as imperialistic. That view includes the present war, and it couldn't be more wrong. This war isn't optional. It's been going on since the Arab-Israeli War in 1973 - we just haven't been paying attention. 9/11 is the direct result of that inattention. Like all primitive warrior cultures, the enemy misinterpreted compassion and restraint as weakness and irresolution.

Despite what the politicians have been saying, this is in fact a war of cultures. The West stands for constitutional government, rule of law, and respect for the political, religious and economic rights of individuals. It prefers to expand itself by example and persuasion. Radical Islamism is exemplified by the Taliban and Al-Quaeda, and intends to expand at gunpoint. Like it or not, everyone has to decide whose side they're on.

Middle of the road? Look there, and usually what you see is a yellow stripe and road kill.

By all means, understand your enemy and his sympathizers. You may be able to turn a few of them around, and it's a prerequisite to defeating the rest. But as Niccolo Machiavelli said, in statecraft it's good to be loved, but more useful to be feared.

Strelnikov
 
Strel's right in pointin' out that lateralist extremes aren't helpin' EITHER side.

Yeah, I agreed wit' Strel. It happens sometimes.

Takin' sides WITHIN this country is only helpin' those lookin' t'blow it up. Roadkill's an apt metaphor.

Maybe AFTER we have no one tryin' t'blow us up, we can go back to the laterist rhetoric, and I can enjoy arguin' wit' Strel and Q again, as it should be. 😉
 
What's New

1/25/2025
Visit Clips4Sale for the webs largest fetish clip store!
Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** brad1701 ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Back
Top