kenny said:
i dont think m/m is cool at all and i agree with tib that you cannot tell me that m/m tickling isnt gay just go to all those tickling links and you will see that most m/m tickling is gay, i for one would not want another man doing thyat to me lets here for f/m and f/f tickling and let the m/m ticking people get there own forum
I am grateful for all the open-minded people with incredible posts, some of whom make me wish I could shake their hands and tell them how awesome they are. I could go on for many paragraphs expressing my gratitude, but I tend to overwrite and I want to keep my post short.
However, posts like the one I quoted really drain me. So F/F is all right but M/M is not. How weird.
Shall we talk about who's got the cooties next?
The anti-M/M macho posts center around what is thought to be unmanly behavior. What if I said that the idea of a man being dominated by a woman (which is what F/M is all about) was unmanly, and that all the high pitched shrieking and girlish laughter in which the F/M male engages make him a nelly queen? Let's be real here: Can you think of any more stereotypically gay behavior?
Obviously, that would be an unfair assessment; I have no right to say it. I do not think anyone who engages in */M tickling is unmanly. If men want to be tickled until they scream, what is wrong with that? Besides, in sexual terms, a female ler with a male lee is the equivalent of a woman on top instead of on her back.
And yet, a woman on top was considered deviant not too long ago.
Liberation, whether for women or men, is a beautiful word.
Next point:
Kenny: Do you realize how offensive it is to suggest that people who like M/M get their own forum? As I wrote on another thread: "I joined this site because it adverstises itself as a place for F/F, M/F, F/M
AND M/M. Anyone who does not wish to hear about M/M in any context needs to find a new site. By signing up for this site, a person has agreed to its aims, one of those aims being M/M discussion. I am thus promoting what this site promotes and doing nothing to hurt it. If the owners suddenly decided that no further M/M discussion was to be allowed, that would be their right. It is their site, not mine. Right now, however, four types of tickling discussion are allowed."
Final point:
While I love all the pro-gay posts, what I think many fail to see is that this is not a gay issue at all. Ironically, people here--many, not all--will accept me as a gay male who likes M/M more than they will accept a straight male who likes it. That has to be a first: the homo is more acceptable than the hetero.
But there is a problem. I care about my straight male friends in real life too much to be comfortable on a site where there is active discrimination against any straight male subgroup. For this reason, I keep my role on this board minimal, which is not what I had originally intended. If it is not a safe place for others, what right do I have to be safe and open?