CheshireCatNY
2nd Level Orange Feather
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2002
- Messages
- 2,353
- Points
- 36
Whoa....calm down....it was a joke.....DECAF!!!
-
If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread -
The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us. -
Check out Tickling.com - the most innovative tickling site of the year. -
>>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
Don't forget to include your username
Oh no he didnt...oh yes I did!! (M/M GAY TICKLING!) (NUDITY!)
z284ca
Guest
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2005
- Messages
- 507
- Points
- 0
Lets boost this up more! Why does it even have to be a big deal, if you like the idea of M/M tickling download this clip you've been told what's in it. If you don't like the idea of it then don't downloaded, Cheshire I'll thank you for uploading even more media for the community but I don't think it should be made a big deal that he uploaded M/M tickling.
FemaleTickleFan
Registered User
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2004
- Messages
- 11
- Points
- 0
Why do have to add to your post "no I'm not gay". Who cares if the clip is "gay" or homoerotic? gay does not equate weak or bad. Quite the opposite in my opinion!
I'm just going to add one final post to this.
Here's the deal, you complainers. (for those of you who do)
It's M/M tickling.
You were warned. Not only were you warned it was M/M, but you were also warned that there is nudity in the clip.
If you came in, knowing it was M/M, even when you don't like M/M, it was your own fault, and it can only be assumed you came to bash it.
If you came to see the clip, and not to bash it, then drop the subject. There's no point in carrying on a huge discussion about something so easily solved. To think, all this started because of a simple request from Ness to keep comments civil. Sheesh. 🙄
It's really not a big deal folks. Lighten up. 🙂
Here's the deal, you complainers. (for those of you who do)
It's M/M tickling.
You were warned. Not only were you warned it was M/M, but you were also warned that there is nudity in the clip.
If you came in, knowing it was M/M, even when you don't like M/M, it was your own fault, and it can only be assumed you came to bash it.
If you came to see the clip, and not to bash it, then drop the subject. There's no point in carrying on a huge discussion about something so easily solved. To think, all this started because of a simple request from Ness to keep comments civil. Sheesh. 🙄
It's really not a big deal folks. Lighten up. 🙂
CheshireCatNY
2nd Level Orange Feather
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2002
- Messages
- 2,353
- Points
- 36
-Kunoke- said:
That was essentially a moot point.....just bringing it up is enough to spark the interest of anyone who would have normally just passed the thread over....."Whats this? whats this? A potentially touchy subject even with a request NOT to cause trouble? WOOHOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!" 😛
11 pages. I thought this thing was dead.
Cheshire, I can almost see where you are coming from in your longer post, but i think that you are missing some key outside variables.
1. We are not talking about tickling in general and its impact in society as a casual pass time, I think that we were focusing mainly on prolonged bondage tickling and questioning wether or not that was a sexual act or not, which it is.
2. Society may accept f/f tickling in casual and in more intense situations, but why is that. Is it because we don't see it as homosexual for women to tie women up and tickle them? I would assert that it is because we really don't care. frankly the reason we don't have this discussion with every f/f clip is because it gets the largest amount of people off, lets be frank.
3. I don't know of any conotation of tickling being a femanine act. I do know of its conotation, as Val said, of being inherently playful and semi-erotic, to all of society as a means of flirtation. And honestly if i remember high school well enough, almost every group of females interacted with each other in a way that sometimes could be mistaken for flirtation. I don't know why, I just remember it being fun to watch.
4. Men i still hold firm will be proven to be the more homosexually active of the two sexes. I think that is why we have so many males that are so extremely anti gay, It's because they don't want anyone to think that that drunk guy on the beach that night was them, get my drift. And also we shun the femanine conotation of homosexuality, nbot tickling as an act.
i hope that made sense, feel free to reply with questions. It's early.
Cheshire, I can almost see where you are coming from in your longer post, but i think that you are missing some key outside variables.
1. We are not talking about tickling in general and its impact in society as a casual pass time, I think that we were focusing mainly on prolonged bondage tickling and questioning wether or not that was a sexual act or not, which it is.
2. Society may accept f/f tickling in casual and in more intense situations, but why is that. Is it because we don't see it as homosexual for women to tie women up and tickle them? I would assert that it is because we really don't care. frankly the reason we don't have this discussion with every f/f clip is because it gets the largest amount of people off, lets be frank.
3. I don't know of any conotation of tickling being a femanine act. I do know of its conotation, as Val said, of being inherently playful and semi-erotic, to all of society as a means of flirtation. And honestly if i remember high school well enough, almost every group of females interacted with each other in a way that sometimes could be mistaken for flirtation. I don't know why, I just remember it being fun to watch.
4. Men i still hold firm will be proven to be the more homosexually active of the two sexes. I think that is why we have so many males that are so extremely anti gay, It's because they don't want anyone to think that that drunk guy on the beach that night was them, get my drift. And also we shun the femanine conotation of homosexuality, nbot tickling as an act.
i hope that made sense, feel free to reply with questions. It's early.
