Perverts on Dailymotion and Youtube uploading tickling clips of very young girls

[stroker]

^ Im sure your right but what does that have to do with my comment about the usage of the words child and pedophile? And no im not kidding .

 

[desperado_flare]

I would just like to point out that before RHIANON began turning this into a thread that made it seem like I was trying to encourage "taking action," I merely was just asking if anyone else thought it was creepy that a guy would have clips of minors tying each other up and having tickle fights?

Then let me ask this: Would you have changed your opinion on it being creepy if everyone else here agreed that it wasn't?

I get your point, but I feel like the much more compelling argument lies in the morality of asking kids for such clips, and nobody is accusing you of participating in that argument. That said, you can't expect a thread like this not to get derailed. haha

 

[FeatherFeet]

Was no one else here tied up and tickled when they were a kid? really? Was kinda normal capture, hide and seek type behavior when I grew up, figured it was kinda common for it to happen. And would obviously expect it to show up on the internet.

People who look at tickling sexually sometimes act like everyone else does and as a result completly dissalows for playful tickling acts that aren't intended to be sexual. Whether or not a pedo chooses to whack off to it has nothing to do with the material itself--some people jack off to a woman brushing her hair. Does that mean there should be no clips of hair brushing on the internet? There is a fetish for EVERYTHING, should we take everything off the internet?

 

[ndj101982]

Was no one else here tied up and tickled when they were a kid? really? Was kinda normal capture, hide and seek type behavior when I grew up, figured it was kinda common for it to happen. And would obviously expect it to show up on the internet.

People who look at tickling sexually sometimes act like everyone else does and as a result completly dissalows for playful tickling acts that aren't intended to be sexual. Whether or not a pedo chooses to whack off to it has nothing to do with the material itself--some people jack off to a woman brushing her hair. Does that mean there should be no clips of hair brushing on the internet? There is a fetish for EVERYTHING, should we take everything off the internet?

We all get that it's not that young kids they are whacking off to in the clips. It's just that, regardless of whether or not it's the tickling aspect that gets you turned on, a person still should not be allowing himself/herself to let that very material turn them on if it involves youngsters.

 

[Jagermeistered]

It's quite wrong to see children exposed liked this. By children, I mean under 18!! Granted it's not exactly child pornonography. But, these days Pedophiles get sick and more sick. How do we control it though? And, how do we define boundaries? If you have a certain fetish, and see your (keyword: your)fetish provocated by an adult on a child; who is to say that adult has a pedophiliac attraction to that child? Especially, if they are a parent trying to be just a parent?

 

[Fat Bastard]

^ Im sure your right but what does that have to do with my comment about the usage of the words child and pedophile? And no im not kidding .

My point is, the demographic for potentially inappropriate internet content gets younger by the day, and it’s being created by the kids themselves without any encouragement from pervs.

And regardless of how the content was created, your “world of difference” isn't going to matter; if you’re caught with a naked picture of a six year old or a seventeen year old, you’re going to jail just the same.

 

[stroker]

^ Their is not one word in my original post that refers to naked pictures of anybody wether they be 7 . 17 or 70, nor is their anything in either of my posts which disagrees with anything youve said . My ONLY point is that is that I have difficulty in thinking that someone who is attracted to a fully formed 17 year should be put in the same category as someone who rapes a 5 year old. because their most certainly is a " world of difference " in those two scenarios.

 

[Comfort Eagle]

Come on. We all know who sends little children these creepy "dare" videos.

When did TMF become cool with these?

 

[Fat Bastard]

^ Their is not one word in my original post that refers to naked pictures of anybody wether they be 7 . 17 or 70, nor is their anything in either of my posts which disagrees with anything youve said . My ONLY point is that is that I have difficulty in thinking that someone who is attracted to a fully formed 17 year should be put in the same category as someone who rapes a 5 year old. because their most certainly is a " world of difference " in those two scenarios.

You stated:

To my mind their is a world of difference between someone getting off to a legally determined underage 16 -17 year old and someone who gets aroused by 6-7 year olds.

And I understand the point you’re trying to make, but in the eyes of the law, your world still comes crashing down upon you.

And make sure you stay away from my teenage daughter.

 

[rhiannon]

I merely was just asking if anyone else thought it was creepy that a guy would have clips of minors tying each other up and having tickle fights?

And all I am saying is that the creepiness of it depends on how minor these kids are! Do they look like kids? Or do they look like young women? Then it also depends on the age of the guy. What if he's fifteen himself?

Plus, it also depends if he's tricking them into making these clips or if the clips where just uploaded by the kids because they thought it was funny.

Was no one else here tied up and tickled when they were a kid?

No, actually I wasn't and I am really glad about it. 🙂

if you’re caught with a naked picture of a six year old or a seventeen year old, you’re going to jail just the same.

I guess I should tell my parents to take all naked pictures of me when I was a child out of their albums quick before they go to jail! 🙂

About the seventeen year old, it depends where on the world you are!

 

[Fat Bastard]

I guess I should tell my parents to take all naked pictures of me when I was a child out of their albums quick before they go to jail! 🙂

Now it all makes sense! It was your parents who seeded your desire to post nude photo’s of yourself.
Please give them an extra big hug & kiss from me next time you see them.

 

[stroker]

FB Re your last post aimed at me. Nice try ,but if you had any idea about how I feel about anyone under the age of about 28 you would relise that their is absolutely no danger of "my world " as you choose to put it crashing down on me. And "make sure You stay away from my teenage daughter" EH!! are YOU kidding.

 

[rhiannon]

Now it all makes sense! It was your parents who seeded your desire to post nude photo’s of yourself.
Please give them an extra big hug & kiss from me next time you see them.

Oh, please! My parents seeded nothing. Don't tell me you never took a picture of your daughter when she was a little girl and took a bath!?

 

[Fat Bastard]

Oh, please! My parents seeded nothing. Don't tell me you never took a picture of your daughter when she was a little girl and took a bath!?

You haven’t seen her facebook page.
We have to constantly referee what she & her friends post.

And how come you didn’t de-identify my quote? That’s very uncharacteristic of you my dear.

 

[rhiannon]

We have to constantly referee what she & her friends post.

That's what should be done until they are a certain age. 🙂 Good job! 🙂
I just don't see how it has anything to do with what I wrote. 🙂

And how come you didn’t de-identify my quote? That’s very uncharacteristic of you my dear.

Honestly? I have no clue how the difference works, although I did notice it before! 🙂

 

[ticklishdanny]

totally creepy whenever i see a video of a group of friends messing around and having fun and see comments like "you should have tied her up and focused more on her feet" or "use a brush and baby oil to tickle her 🙂"

 

[anubis111]

I know I’m going to regret posting on here, I’ve seen a lot of these kinds of threads come and go and they all just end up turning into one big argument about how one person doesn’t like what someone else wrote and spends the rest of their responses flaming them. But anyway, to my view. I agree with danny. It’s very disturbing to see those kinds of responses, (use a brush and baby oil) because you know that whoever posted that is either someone who is well versed in the tickling world, or someone just posted a "smart" comment. However there isn’t really much you can do about it besides flag the response. As has been said before in this thread, MOST of the videos like that are posted by kids just for fun, with no thought of who is going to view it. People can try all they want to try and stop those vids from surfacing but unless you tell every teen in the world about what kind of attention their vid is going to bring, the vids are just going to keep popping up. And just to make this response a little longer, lol, my take on the fact that the vids are on a profile with adult tickling too. If they were uploaded by the person then probably harmless, if they were in their favorites though, that’s a red flag.

 

[sirseaspraysr]

The Problem with Thought Police

I recently saw someone wacking into a pizza, but I'm not in favor of banning it because it happens to be his preferred love interest. I personally have an erotic attachment to doorknobs and baby hippos and would understand if some tried to ban them from the Internet completely (These thoughts are really holding me back!), but I don't think that is likely to happen.

What our Projecting, little guilt-ridden community doesn't get is that the world out there doesn't see things as we do. Try telling those thousands of Mom's & Pops that they're contributing to child pornography and they will rightfully consider you to be the weirdo. To them, these are cherished family memories and the fact that they are getting someone off is a matter of the utmost irrelevancy to them. We are like a boy with a spoon trying to hold back a tidal wave.

Time to grow up and see the Big picture. Not everyone thinks alike.

(If someone does succeed in banning the kid videos, however, see what you can do about those sexy doorknobs and hippos, please.)

--Sir Sea Spray Sr

 

[Radiohead 7140]

of all the ad-nauseum topics of the TMF, this one might be the most exhausting and least interesting.

so i'm gonna bump it!

keep goin!

 

[TheTickleMonster]

Is it bad that the one thing that bugged me is that the OP kept calling them very young? 5 or 10 is very young. Middle and high school is just young.

 

[NonConTickler]

People need to mind their own business. If it's not your kids in the video, what do you care??

 

[rhiannon]

If it's not your kids in the video, what do you care??

And I thought you couldn't get any worse!

 

[Jagermeistered]

People need to mind their own business. If it's not your kids in the video, what do you care??

What if it was my kid? Should I mind my own business, then?

 

[anubis111]

What if it was my kid? Should I mind my own business, then?

Why yes, you should. If the video had your kid in it then the video is your buisness so please, mind it! lol

 

[Seanbaby]

I think I'm in that camp too. I have no problem with kids uploading that kind of thing by themselves. Kids will be kids, after all. It's when the kid uploads a "tickle dare" video or something and you get tons of creeps writing comments of a clearly sexual nature that makes you shiver. In the end, it's the job of the company to remove those videos, however that shouldn't stop anyone from reporting it if it makes you uncomfortable. That's what the button is there for.