Perverts on Dailymotion and Youtube uploading tickling clips of very young girls

[CuntTard]

Given DailyMotion is essentially theft of content...

 

[sirseaspraysr]

Projection--Projection

Better some girl crying her eyes out because her video of fun time was removed than her videos being downloaded to fap over.[/QUOTE]

Why?

The millions of potential Youtube posters, both now and in the future, don't see their home movies as pornographic. Nor do Movie Or Magazine producers in whose products those scenes regularly appear.

You would prefer to allow a handful of active YouTube perverts, probably no more than 6 at any given time, to inconvenience society at-large?

I've got a better idea. How about we do nothing and let these lunatics fap their brains out.

--Sir Sea Spray Sr

 

[NonConTickler]

How about we do nothing and let these lunatics fap their brains out.

I agree!

 

[mopug]

I do find it very disturbing when people post clips of underage girls getting tickled.

That said, I do use dailymotion, because my ass is broke and I can't afford to purchase clips at this point in my life. When I have money, I have no problem supporting the producers that I love.

 

[Q_0]

"While it does disturb me that people turn to naive children when there's so much great 18+ material out there, I feel like the absence of actual danger in this situation makes it negligible. "

Not so much for me, since I'm not into people being tied up, I like tickling to be more playful.

So I go on youtube to find that, and most of the ticklees are under 18.

So yeah, I watch underage teenagers being tickled sometimes. If someone calls me a pedophile for that, I'd suggest you read the definition of the word.

Also, check this out: http://www.tsbmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/10/kim-kardashian-14-years-old.jpg

That's Kim Kardashian at 14 years old - yes, as creepy as you might think it is, girls can be hot at 14.

 

[rhiannon]

That said, I do use dailymotion, because my ass is broke and I can't afford to purchase clips at this point in my life. When I have money, I have no problem supporting the producers that I love.

Not that it belongs into this thread, what do you do if you want new jeans and can't afford them? Walk into a store and take some?

 

[Provocateur]

Not that it belongs into this thread, what do you do if you want new jeans and can't afford them? Walk into a store and take some?

First: Non sequitur.
Second: Piracy isn't equal to theft. Piracy creates a copy, theft steals the original. It's an important fact.
Third: The man said he supports the producers he likes when he has the money, I think that should be applauded. Here's a man saying honestly that he does watch a clip or two of Dailymotion, however buys the one he likes most when he is capable. That man should be applauded for his honesty!

 

[rhiannon]

Second: Piracy isn't equal to theft. Piracy creates a copy, theft steals the original. It's an important fact.

How is that important? We are talking about a video clip, the copy is exactly the same as the original. Plus, if you steal a copy Levi's jeans it's still illegal.

The man said he supports the producers he likes when he has the money, I think that should be applauded. Here's a man saying honestly that he does watch a clip or two of Dailymotion, however buys the one he likes most when he is capable. That man should be applauded for his honesty!

Wow, great...someone who buys stuff when he can afford it and steals it when he can't. We're not talking about food! It's about something to fap over. He just shouldn't get new material if he can't afford it.

 

[Provocateur]

I don't care much about what is illegal and what is not, it's a poor argument and also a logical fallacy (http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/appeal-to-authority). If you have to compare damages done, stealing a pair of jeans would do twice the damage that making a molecule-per-molecule copy would (given you could with 0 energy consumption. The jeans are just an example). Why? Because to steal a CD you must take it. That means that some poor guy in some store must pay for it, and also does not gain profit. Thus the damage to him is the price of the item + the item. If you make a copy, he still has the item, however that 1 copy hasn't sold, but can still sell later. Thus the damage to him is the price of the item, but the item still remains. That is why Piracy is not equal to Theft. There are many other reasons why the two aren't comparable, however this is one of the most quoted.

He actually buys clips, he actually does give something for what he takes. That should be applauded. Why? Because there are many who just take. And honestly I must say that many clip authors do not deserve the money. Fake reactions, bad camera angles, etc... There are many very, very poor clips out there and one could waste a lot of money on them. It's much better for the consumer that we get to grab a pirate copy and see the whole thing before we decide to commit our hard-earned cash to it. And besides, piracy in this form arguably doesn't even do real damage, because many of the people who watch that way wouldn't have bothered to buy anyway because they either can't or they won't. This way some people who would have bought still buy, but also get a chance to decide what they will buy and what they won't.

All this aside, I am a big supporter of piracy. Why? Because game companies sell shit games for more then they are worth. I don't want to give my money for that. They get enough money from the suckers who buy that shit for such inflated prices. I actually do buy the games I believe are worth the money, and so do many others. The music industry isn't suffering at all, and neither is the movies industry, because actors still get hundreds of thousands for roles, and their managers get even more because they take massive cuts. People like U2 members and 50cent got lots of money and really shouldn't have the right to bitch about piracy. Neither should Ubisoft, Sony, etc. because they are also swimming in cash. As for tickling video companies complaining about loss of revenue, that's because maybe there are too many of them. Less companies means the money is split in less parts. When there are too many, then nobody gets rich.

 

[Raytheon]

You can justify and belittle it all you like - If you wank over a picture or video of children you are a Pedophile and those pictures and videos are Child Pornography. Your internet history is logged click-for-click by your ISP so the police will know about it and regardless of the severity of the child porn you looked at or the length of time that has past between the offense and finding you the Police do and will catch up with you.

Nice to know everyone who has wanked over children tickling each other on youtube or gone on the Yahoo/MSN kiddie tickling groups will get eventually caught.

 

[Provocateur]

Will they? Will a person downloading of a site they access using it's IP address (such sites don't even have a DNS name), with noscript, going through TOR and over a wifi they hacked (or was left open by a fool) get caught? Not very easily. A few perverts who weren't careful get caught, but the stuff is still at large because there are those who know how to hide.

EDIT: The only additional safety the site with an IP address adds is that not many will know about it or remember the IP address. It's an obscure number, easy to forget. Nothing special there. Noscript, TOR and hacked wifi are the real safety here.

 

[Q_0]

You can justify and belittle it all you like - If you wank over a picture or video of children you are a Pedophile and those pictures and videos are Child Pornography. Your internet history is logged click-for-click by your ISP so the police will know about it and regardless of the severity of the child porn you looked at or the length of time that has past between the offense and finding you the Police do and will catch up with you.

Nice to know everyone who has wanked over children tickling each other on youtube or gone on the Yahoo/MSN kiddie tickling groups will get eventually caught.

You are talking about Children and not Teenagers, right?

In case you're not, read the definition of the word 'Pedophile' 🙂

I don't think the police will be too worried about some 30 second videos of fully clothed non-tied 17 year olds being tickled.

 

[rhiannon]

All this aside, I am a big supporter of piracy.

I will not get into that any further because it just doesn't belong in this thread. But hey, why don't you repeat that whole post up there in the piracy-thread??

If you wank over a picture or video of children you are a Pedophile

Agreed.

and those pictures and videos are Child Pornography.

Disagreed. If someone gets a copy of pictures of me as a baby getting a bath and wanks over them, they are still only family pictures and not child pornography. Therefore it doesn't really matter if the person gets caught having them - even if it could be proven that they wanked over them, it would still not be illegal.

 

[sirseaspraysr]

The Law

You can take out a full-page ad in the NY times, listing all the kid videos you down-loaded & whacked over, and the law will not only not care, but criticize you for wasting everyone's time with your "confession".

People are prosecuted for specific illegal acts, not for what lies between their ears, no matter how demented it happens to be.

Legally, while I wouldn't recommend either, being turned on by children carries as much weight as being turned on by baboons.

--Sir Sea Spray Sr

 

[Raytheon]

I'll say it again ... you can justify and belittle it all you like - If you wank over a picture or video of children you are a Pedophile.

If your happy being a Pedophile knowing you are sexually turned on by children and wank over them then good for you 🙂

 

[rhiannon]

you can justify and belittle it all you like - If you wank over a picture or video of children you are a Pedophile.

And if you would read and understand what people are saying - nobody disagrees with that!

 

[Raytheon]

Which is why i said "If your happy being a Pedophile knowing you are sexually turned on by children and wank over them then good for you 🙂"
Its unbelievable that people are openly defending being a Pedophile and justifying masturbating to child pornography.

 

[sirseaspraysr]

I haven't heard anyone defending child porn.

 

[Raytheon]

Well ive got the moral high ground ... bitch 😀

To be honest i couldn't care less. Go on 4chan and there are entire boards openly sharing child pornography. Its just surprising people on here are happy to justify / acknowledge or practically admit to it without anyone standing up for whats right and saying pedophilia is wrong.

Its like me saying theres nothing wrong with dicking a 4 year old boy then you lot saying yeah well there are some pretty sexy kids in the park these days. lol

 

[Provocateur]

There is about as much wrong with a Pedofile as there is with a Homosexual or Tickling fetishist. The only difference is the sauce.
And while a Tickling fetishist can tickle a partner and a Homosexual can get out of the closet, a Pedofile is banned and imprisoned. While we have no disease, they are sick people.
That's double standards and people who cannot see beyond their emotions. I'll get flamed for any solution I propose, so I'll just leave it at that.



@Raytheon: You are obviously don't know, because some anons keep trying to sneak such topics in, however mods quickly react and remove it. Besides, it's not boards, it's threads, mostly in /b/ that get removed quickly or 404 because nobody wishes to participate in that shit.

 

[rhiannon]

Its unbelievable that people are openly defending being a Pedophile and justifying masturbating to child pornography.

People can't help being a pedophile just as you can't help being a ticklephile. The only difference is that a pedophile can never act on his impulses. If he does, he does something wrong and illegal and deserves going to jail. Same thing could happen to you if you tickled someone against their will.

Child pornography is wrong. But a picture of a child does not become child pornography because a pedophile is wanking over it. And to be honest, I'd rather have a pedophile wanking over a children's bathing suit catalog (legal, by the way) than having him snatch a child from the street!

 

[Raytheon]

 

[rhiannon]

Interesting, you're reading my mind. 🙂

 

[gypsyhanna]

I reported one that was blatant....I mean it was both n/c abusive tickling, on a minor, and it had definite sexual undertones. But I notice it is still on YouTube, always pops up in the search when I am looking for something very adult. I am not over-reactive about these things and I tend to give the benefit of the doubt. But this one was way out of line, there were even people in the comments section requesting worse vids, god knows if that happened or not. It was one of the most disturbing things I've ever seen on Youtube. There is a problem here. I see good, consensual adult tickling vids that get pulled for being "obscene" so I see no excuse for these pedos to get away with doing a hell of a lot worse.

 

[Ekorren]

I think that i've never seen a video like the way you're meaning them to be. If they are still up, spread it/them to people here on TMF so we can flag it? Hanna, you said 1 is still up, which one is it? Let me know and i'll go right away and send YouTube an email and i'll flag the video right away.