• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • Check out Tickling.com - the most innovative tickling site of the year.
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

Real, Unfaked, Tickling TORTURE

kurchatovium said:
I love sorority initiation themes as well bella I think for the reason you describe. Also there is an air of mystery and secrecy about the initiation process too which adds to the excitement.

The nonconsensuality thing doesn't have to be that believable for me to enjoy the video. It is more important for me that no one was actually "used" just to make a video look more real. Thats why I kind of like "the zone" description (glad you like it too) because there is narrow area where the tickling looks sadistic in a kind of mischievous sort of way, but not to the point of being downright nasty.

I think your right though finding highly ticklish people who love to be tickled is the big key to making the videos look great.

Ok, I agree that even if I KNOW that the "secret agent" in the tickling video is not really a secret agent, if it is done well, it will still be a lot better then the happy crappy slumber party tie you up loosely with pantyhose and giggle fun shit that you see all the time. There are so few videos where the damn ticklee even says "no no please" with a simulated terror, or better yet curses at the tickler out of anger. They always just laugh and seem like they are having a grand old time which is so damn boring.

Where I disagree with you Kurch is that I think the best model for a tickling video has to be a girl who HATES being tickled but NEEDs some quick cash and DOESN'T have a choice. Harder to find but they are out there.

I just wish there could be a little "film" tickling video, where it starts out with a kidnaper, maybe you first see it from his point of view as he drives in his car at night, staking out a hot young girl getting out of work. You watch from his angle as he approaches her from behind and chloroforms her. Cut scene, next scene in a dungeon like setting, the girl is tied to a bondage apparatus, ankles locked, open toed shoes still on, gagged but trying to scream through it..... You get the idea. It would be so much more exciting then: Scene one, two smiling girls in a room, one rolled in carpet gets tickled. Giggle Giggle Giggle, switch...... Blaaaahh!!

I don't understand why all the video companies can't do something cool. I wish Jeff, TC, would get in here and do some talking. I'd say that Foot Paradise has actually come the closest to what I've described above, only thing they usually have a bit more to wish for in their victims. Please comment.
The Dirk
 
Unfaked Tickling

The Hysterical Squealing series by Bill_Edwards seems to be some good Real, Unfaked, Tickling TORTURE. Susan really gets it good in that third video.
 
Noncon can equal a fat lip

Dirkman said:


Ok, I agree that even if I KNOW that the "secret agent" in the tickling video is not really a secret agent, if it is done well, it will still be a lot better then the happy crappy slumber party tie you up loosely with pantyhose and giggle fun shit that you see all the time. There are so few videos where the damn ticklee even says "no no please" with a simulated terror, or better yet curses at the tickler out of anger. They always just laugh and seem like they are having a grand old time which is so damn boring.

Where I disagree with you Kurch is that I think the best model for a tickling video has to be a girl who HATES being tickled but NEEDs some quick cash and DOESN'T have a choice. Harder to find but they are out there.

I just wish there could be a little "film" tickling video, where it starts out with a kidnaper, maybe you first see it from his point of view as he drives in his car at night, staking out a hot young girl getting out of work. You watch from his angle as he approaches her from behind and chloroforms her. Cut scene, next scene in a dungeon like setting, the girl is tied to a bondage apparatus, ankles locked, open toed shoes still on, gagged but trying to scream through it..... You get the idea. It would be so much more exciting then: Scene one, two smiling girls in a room, one rolled in carpet gets tickled. Giggle Giggle Giggle, switch...... Blaaaahh!!

I don't understand why all the video companies can't do something cool. I wish Jeff, TC, would get in here and do some talking. I'd say that Foot Paradise has actually come the closest to what I've described above, only thing they usually have a bit more to wish for in their victims. Please comment.
The Dirk


Hi Dirkman, I have a couple comments as a minor vid producer:

I know how much you guys want a truly nonconsensual video. But speaking for myself and I suspect other producers, I really, REALLY, don't relish the idea of tickling someone that will want to kick my lil' brown heiney when he or she finally gets loose. I have fun when I tickle, the more ruthless the better-but making someone angry and betraying the trust they instilled in me to allow me to tie them makes me ill, period. Not saying right or wrong, just saying I can't and won't do it. I have many friends in the BDSM world, and some of them are into things that I HATE-electricity play, for instance. If one of them tied me up and then brought out a violet wand I'd chew through my restraints and cause them serious hurt. I can easily put myself in the place of someone who trusts me not to do things against their will or past their obvious limits. No amount of money tossed at her after the shoot makes up for the lack of respect.

Now as for using it as part of a plot, it's an awesome idea! But I've said it before and I'll say it again: in my experience, ticklish people canNOT act. If they could Calstar would be the cream of the crop and folks like Jeff, TC and myself would never have had the fire lit under us to try and make a better product 🙂. I hope TC or another company has luck finding willing girls who are ticklish and can carry a scene!

There are several videos by Magic Touch where the young ladies did it for the money-one, "Jenny" I believe, fights and screams and obviously HATES it. Jeff commented on nearly 'getting his ass kicked by a tied up girl'. I have a copy of it and it's pretty cool if that's your cup o' tea.

From what I can tell, video creators tend to film what they'd like to see, what they feel is missing from other companies; and it's different for all of us. I dislike plots, so I don't do them. I would love to see the kidnap scenario, as long as the camera is still rolling when she gets loose and beats him with a shovel 😛. Or where she's taken a self defense class and breaks his nose before he even gets to his chloroform...oh wait, that would be a damn short film. (you can tell I have issue with the whole 'helpless chick' deal).

I gotta say this: while I don't care for tickling videos with plots, I do respect the desire to watch nonconsensual fare; I'm also into spanking, and I HATE spanking videos where the girl just lies there blissfully. I need a plot involving a 'naughty girl' getting her just punishment, so I can truly relate to the dislike of happy crappy stuff.

Good luck!

Bella
 
Continuity...

For NYCity: Some Mods don't like to be questioned regarding our enforcement "codes" and such, but in the spirit of fall, I'll endeavor to show you one of the things we take into account: We read the whole thread and attempt to connect the dots if possible. For instance, the 2 posts below, one of which you felt was offensive, seem VERY linked to me, and hence I allow the explanation given in the first to justify the seemingly unrelated, unsubstantiated (at first glance) opinion from amk714.


kurchatovium
TMF EXPERT

Registered: Oct 2001
Location:
Posts: 442
I think there is something like "a zone" for me. Where the tickling seems to be merciless enough to be exciting and yet not so intense as to appear sick. Thus to me in reality it should be consensual although it may not have to appear that way in the video. I think the crap, happy stuff Dirkman is talking about that you see in almost all CalStar videoes is unacceptable.
_______________________________________________________


amk714 The Zone! Perfect description, . Yes, the victims should AGREE to be tickled non-consensually! And yes, CalStar videos suck more than my vacuum.
_______________________________________________


Btw, you can report any post which you feel needs a Mod review by utilizing the appropriate button provided in the thread for that purpose. Hope this clears up any misconception of unfair treatment you may have had. Btw #2, I've never bought a video and have no favorites....

🙂 Q
 
To NYCity and Q...

I'm sorry for posting such a negative comment. It was only my opinion, nothing more. I should have quoted kurchatovium to put my comment into context, but I was too lazy at the time. Even so, I did not mean to offend NYCity or anyone else who likes CalStar videos. If any post of mine is inappropriate, I WANT any moderator to edit or delete it. Thank you for explaining how the moderators review posts, Q, I really appreciate it. Sorry, NYCity, for that post. 🙁

P.S. As I've said in a previous post, I've never bought any videos either, Q, so I can only go by what I've seen. Personally, I prefer Realtickling, but--well, look at my new sig below! 😀
 
Last edited:
There are people who like Cal Star tickling videos otherwise they would not keep making them. If you do like them thats fine. Before I found out about other video companies I bought a number of them. Many of their videos I did not care for that much but there were some I liked. I did not mean to offend anyone who likes Cal Star videos its just most of their stuff now does not appeal to me.

I must agree with bella on the point that I would not want anyone to just grab me and do something to me that they know I don't like and try to throw a bunch of money at me afterward to make up for it. Even if they know I might like that type of kinky play and did not ask me first I would not like it. In addition to not being a very nice thing to do to someone it also opens someone up to a host of lawsuits which is not something any video company wants.
 
Your post did not "offend" me. I do not happen to like that company's videos either, for all the reasons TickleVids stated.

I've seen Myriads address this before. Comments like, "They suck" are not supposed to be allowed. Comments like, "They suck because...." are allowed, as long as there is a reason provided.

Whether or not someone likes or dislikes a particular company or video involved is not the point. My points are that

1) The rules may not be enforced equally for all video companies, and if that's the case, the rules should state that.

and

2) If one comment like that stands, there will be others, and then, pretty soon, we're no better than the AMT, and none of us want that.

Qjakal, thanks for the explanation, but I thought my question would interest a number of people who don't like favoritism (real or perceived) and that's why I didn't use the mod button. As for questioning decisions, sometimes in this world, decisions by the "authorities" need to be questioned.
 
NYCity...

amk also clarified his view on Cal Star two posts later where he explained why he thought they sucked, which was still prior to your accusation.
 
Originally posted by NYCity

Your post did not "offend" me. I do not happen to like that company's videos either, for all the reasons TickleVids stated.

I've seen Myriads address this before. Comments like, "They suck" are not supposed to be allowed. Comments like, "They suck because...." are allowed, as long as there is a reason provided.

Whether or not someone likes or dislikes a particular company or video involved is not the point. My points are that

1) The rules may not be enforced equally for all video companies, and if that's the case, the rules should state that.

and

2) If one comment like that stands, there will be others, and then, pretty soon, we're no better than the AMT, and none of us want that.

Qjakal, thanks for the explanation, but I thought my question would interest a number of people who don't like favoritism (real or perceived) and that's why I didn't use the mod button. As for questioning decisions, sometimes in this world, decisions by the "authorities" need to be questioned.

I'm glad my post did not offend you, NYCity. I agree that I should have given a reason, and I probably should have quoted kurchatovium also. I certainly agree that the rules should be enforced equally and that the TMF should never become the AMT. I also hate favoritism, and yes, many times decisions need to be questioned. Check out my new sig for the end of this reply. Peace, NYCity. 🙂

P.S. Thanks, Phineas, but NYCity can post whatever whenever!
 
The Authorities?

Hmm...I always think of the Mods as having about the same authority and impact on the lives here as a high school coach..lol..which is "not much" unless you're a player, and even then you have options! Our decisions here are affecting ONE website that deals with an unusual fascination that we all share in some form, tickling. The favoritism issue has been tossed about since the inception of the Forum, and there's no real substance to it. As I stated before, I have no allegiance to ANY vid producer or other entity. Before becoming a Mod, I witnessed their actions (the visible ones) and usually agreed with the overall "tone" of the Forum, which of course is why I remained and participated. The objective here is to maintain some form of civil societial behavior. Other motives that are assigned to the Mods function are erroneous. This not a paid position, but a labor of love, and there's days when it IS labor. But, to quote MY favorite Mod, Sir Dvnc, "It's all about love!" 🙂 Q
 
I'm going to chime in here. I also intensely dislike "happy crappy" tickling videos. I recently bought 4 videos from The Laugher and two of them (The Ticklefreak and Depression Begone!") were exactly what I'd describe as happy crappy. Both involved talented tickling, hystericaly screaming ticklees (both of whom were very physically attractive) and absoloutley no banter between anyone. All the ticklees ever did was scream for more which seemed distinctly against the whole point of the excercise to me. Even girls who enjoy being tickled beg the tickler to stop and when both girls reacted to the palms of their hands being tickled like they were being force fed 50,000 volts of alternating current, whilst making a sound that was reminiscent of Clyde from Any Which Way But Loose, the realism just went out the window. With both being attractive girls, it also proves that looks don't make a video.

Neither of the girls begged, neither said they wanted it to stop and neither had that agonised look that us eviiiiiillllll blokes love so much. Yes the tickling was looking good...........yes, both girls shrieked like banshees.........yes, both videos were boring as hell and are relegated to the bottom of my closet for the fore-seeable future.
 
BigJim said:
I'm going to chime in here. I also intensely dislike "happy crappy" tickling videos. I recently bought 4 videos from The Laugher and two of them (The Ticklefreak and Depression Begone!") were exactly what I'd describe as happy crappy. Both involved talented tickling, hystericaly screaming ticklees (both of whom were very physically attractive) and absoloutley no banter between anyone. All the ticklees ever did was scream for more which seemed distinctly against the whole point of the excercise to me. Even girls who enjoy being tickled beg the tickler to stop and when both girls reacted to the palms of their hands being tickled like they were being force fed 50,000 volts of alternating current, whilst making a sound that was reminiscent of Clyde from Any Which Way But Loose, the realism just went out the window. With both being attractive girls, it also proves that looks don't make a video.

Neither of the girls begged, neither said they wanted it to stop and neither had that agonised look that us eviiiiiillllll blokes love so much. Yes the tickling was looking good...........yes, both girls shrieked like banshees.........yes, both videos were boring as hell and are relegated to the bottom of my closet for the fore-seeable future.

You just summed it up for me Jim. I don't understand why it has to be this way. It strikes me as ironic that the stories written in this community are so lavish and erotic with their spy interrogation, kidnap, punishment, revenge, and other nonconsenual plots but all the videos are so non representative of any of that. When I first got in this thing of ours, I had not one video at all. But on alt.sex.fetish.tickling, I would read a bunch of these stories and say to myself "My Lord, these are the exact same fantasies I have been having" and it was such a relief. I was so dissappointed when I then followed that up by getting a Cal Star vid. When people from the actual tickling community started forming video companies, I was sure that it would be done right and that these fantasies could be acted out properly. But the opposite is true. Lets hope for the future. I applaud TC's "Of Sweet Suffering" and "NonConsent" and also Foot Paradises "NonConsent". The rest goes in the closet Jim.
The Dirk
 
Dirkman said:


You just summed it up for me Jim. I don't understand why it has to be this way. It strikes me as ironic that the stories written in this community are so lavish and erotic with their spy interrogation, kidnap, punishment, revenge, and other nonconsenual plots but all the videos are so non representative of any of that. When I first got in this thing of ours, I had not one video at all. But on alt.sex.fetish.tickling, I would read a bunch of these stories and say to myself "My Lord, these are the exact same fantasies I have been having" and it was such a relief. I was so dissappointed when I then followed that up by getting a Cal Star vid. When people from the actual tickling community started forming video companies, I was sure that it would be done right and that these fantasies could be acted out properly. But the opposite is true. Lets hope for the future. I applaud TC's "Of Sweet Suffering" and "NonConsent" and also Foot Paradises "NonConsent". The rest goes in the closet Jim.
The Dirk

Hmmm, I'd disagree with the last two. Foot Paradises non-con video was the most evil, disgusting thing utterly lacking in taste that I've ever seen the community produce. It was quite different to "Without Consent" by TC, because at least in that the two girls were friends and the lee was never in fear for her safety. FP's version was the most degrading way of treating a girl without raping her and I would personally bunghole that turd that did the tickling, with a baseball bat or a garden fork if I ever met him. Whichever came to hand sooner. I justify my angry comment to any mods who read this by saying that no human has the right to subject another to that kind of experience simply because they want to produce a new type of vid for the community market.

FP deserves all the venom it gets, not least because they didn't learn from their mistake and YET another non-con video. (Even if they do say they didn't take it as far as the first one.) The ultimate problem is that videos like that will sell more than any other videos on the market, because they'll cause more sales from people who don't own any other type of vid. I'm glad to say that I don't personally own a copy, I saw it at a friend's house. I am glad I did, because I had been considering buying it and seeing it there taught me a valuable lesson in human trust and mutual respect.
 
Originally posted by BigJim

Hmmm, I'd disagree with the last two. Foot Paradises non-con video was the most evil, disgusting thing utterly lacking in taste that I've ever seen the community produce. It was quite different to "Without Consent" by TC, because at least in that the two girls were friends and the lee was never in fear for her safety. FP's version was the most degrading way of treating a girl without raping her and I would personally bunghole that turd that did the tickling, with a baseball bat or a garden fork if I ever met him. Whichever came to hand sooner. I justify my angry comment to any mods who read this by saying that no human has the right to subject another to that kind of experience simply because they want to produce a new type of vid for the community market.

FP deserves all the venom it gets, not least because they didn't learn from their mistake and YET another non-con video. (Even if they do say they didn't take it as far as the first one.) The ultimate problem is that videos like that will sell more than any other videos on the market, because they'll cause more sales from people who don't own any other type of vid. I'm glad to say that I don't personally own a copy, I saw it at a friend's house. I am glad I did, because I had been considering buying it and seeing it there taught me a valuable lesson in human trust and mutual respect.

BigJim, I'm glad you brought this to our attention. In another post, I found out about one of their videos and that made me think this was a good company. Now, if I ever get around to buying tickling videos, I will NEVER buy one from FP. The descriptions of the non-con videos on its website seem to justify your comments, mate. I wonder whether filming such a video could be considered a crime under the law and what, if anything, could be done about it. When we talk about non-con videos, we are talking about the THEMES only. Everyone who's tickled should agree to it and not have it forced upon them. Absolutely unforgivable. 😡
 
I have to say, I like the light stuff at times, and there are times I like the heavier, more intense tickling as well. My first ever tape, in fact, was the 1st Cal Star tickle tape "Tied and Tickled #1" back in 1986. For it's time, it was intense! The woman was clearly quite ticklish, the guy really got heavy into it & didn't stop tickling to change postions or talk to her (I love verbal teasing, but you don't have to quit tickling to do it!) and this was done at a time when safewords really were not often used. I have fond memories of this video.

>>>>>And as a 'ler, I've been told I'm one of the more ruthless ladies out there. <<<<<

I have seen a video of Bella working on another woman. I have seen pictures of her working on a guy. I saw her 'live' at a NEST a few years ago. The woman is good at what she does!

I have seen a few videos that Kuj has done, including an edited version of one of his sorrority tapes, and a pretty intense video he did some years ago with another woman in a private home, done in costume. He really takes it close to the non-consent gray area, sometimes even going well into it. His videos are indeed worth owning.

Like Bella brings up, an intense session does not have to be completely non consentual. Some great examples I have seen include MTP's "Farrah" tapes, and "Without Conscent" by Fem Feet (the woman actually begins to cry when it is all over, although, from the camera angles, set ups and dialog, I don't think it was truly non consentual - I mean, after the 3rd bondage position and a guy standing there with a video camera, wouldn't the woman have an idea what was gonna happen?)

I am both a 'ler and 'lee, and the first time I went under the ropes, I was definatly tickled to the point of no longer consenting to be in the position I was in. Although I was thankful at the time of the "scene" ending when it did (nothing is so humbling as to scream - not say, but SCREAM "mercy" and mean it) I have always secretly wished that it kept going, beyond my consent and endurance, just to see what lay beyond. I still want to experience this, although I'm a little tougher now. And could I actually tickle someone against their will, seriously and intensly? Well, despite the blow that the better side of my humanity will take, under the right conditions, I believe I could.

There are a few videos out there that actually seem to invole true nonconsentaul tickling..... TJ Productions had one called "Tricked", which I'd love to see. They tickled a model until she used her safe word, and then just kept going. She never shot another video for them. Then there's the controversial video from Foot Paradise, which, again, I have never seen (I think it's called simply "Non-Consent" or some such name). A lot of people have complained about it's content - and it's also one of their biggest sellers. Supposedly it is pretty relentless.

I actually own 2 videos that seem to feature non-consent tickling and a smattering of videos where the ticklee is tickled to the point of unendurance. I must say, although they very much appeal to my sadistic, 'ler side, they are not particularly erotic or interesting. One, believe it or not, comes from Cal-Star. I think it's T&T#5. It involves call girls and a man who pays to tickle them. Well, the final actress obviously is both very ticklish and does NOT like it. She's angry throughout her entire sessions, and her laughter is clearly a forced, against-her-will reaction to stimulus she does not welcome (T&T #7 has a willing 'victim', but there is a short, slightly ugly part where the woman starts laughing from too much relentless tickling and gets very angry, yelling through her laughter. T&T #6 had a woman nearly in tears from unrelenting tickling, too). Also, Bon-Vue's Tickler Girls has one lady getting upset near the end of her ordeal.

But the Second tape that I refer to above is my copy of "Tina's Tickling Terror", by a now defunct company called E. E. LTD. It featured a model who, it certainly seems, knew what she was getting involved with.

However, she had probably never been tied and tickled before, and it shows. Her reactions aren't that great, at least by the benchmark that many of us have, you can bearly even hear her (she's a tiny woman and obviously a heavy smoker). To me the tickling isn't even that heavy, but that's the trick, I guess. This isn't a woman "into" the scene; more likely she's a college kid or stripper who wants to make some extra money. Point is, she isn't into it. This is one of the videos that still gives me a wierd feeling. Why? Well, during her tickling, it reaches a point where all the action stops, the tickler looks a little surprised, and immidiately unties the woman (good for him). At this point, you see what's up. The woman is crying very intensly and clearly the tickling, mild by our standards, was too much for her. She became frustrated and scared. Even though they stopped the tickling, they tried to end the film right there, in some kind of context in accordance of the plot set up. And the woman does go on with the little improvised ending, but crying the whole time, clinging tightly to the tickler. This really was a woman tickled intensely - for her - and when I saw her very real reaction, I felt pretty bad. The nobler part of me is glad I feel bad, and I'm thankful the guy let her go when he realized what was happening. But I'm also fully aware that I have never gotten rid of this tape, and, over time, I have viewed it more than once.... ah, the duality of man.
 
Originally posted by Oddjob0226

There are a few videos out there that actually seem to invole true nonconsentaul tickling..... TJ Productions had one called "Tricked", which I'd love to see. They tickled a model until she used her safe word, and then just kept going. She never shot another video for them. Then there's the controversial video from Foot Paradise, which, again, I have never seen (I think it's called simply "Non-Consent" or some such name). A lot of people have complained about it's content - and it's also one of their biggest sellers. Supposedly it is pretty relentless.

I have to disagree, Oddjob. Tickling a person even after she or he uses a safe word is just plain wrong; that violates the agreement between the 'lee and the 'ler. I don't blame that model for not doing another video for TJP. That FP's non-con video sells as much as it does is sad, and I agree with BigJim's assertion that it causes more sales from people that don't own any type of vid. "Happy crappy" videos are at one end of the spectrum, totally non-con videos at the other, and videos with non-con themes but consenting victims are in the middle, which is where I stand.
 
>>>>I have to disagree, Oddjob. Tickling a person even after she or he uses a safe word is just plain wrong; that violates the agreement between the 'lee and the 'ler. I don't blame that model for not doing another video for TJP. <<<<


Oh, in no way am I saying it's right, I'm just saying it exsists, and the original poster was looking for such a thing. I did say I am curious in seeing this tape, and I am, but that's the lurid, evil side of me, and it would be far from my proudest moment. Besides, I haven't seen it. I know no one who has. It could all just be more hype.
 
Oddjob0226 said:
and "Without Conscent" by Fem Feet (the woman actually begins to cry when it is all over, although, from the camera angles, set ups and dialog, I don't think it was truly non consentual - I mean, after the 3rd bondage position and a guy standing there with a video camera, wouldn't the woman have an idea what was gonna happen?)


Well to be fair, it didn't start with him standing there with the camera. He was standing round a corner and she didn't even know he was there till Priscilla looked over and said "hi". Then all hell broke loose. (Horror stricken just about describes it.)

On top of that there is the explanation that Cierra Baynes gave me for Toni Summers falling for the same ploy three times.

"Well, she is blonde!" :blaugh: :blaugh: :blaugh:
 
Non-Consensual tickling videos

For those who aren't aware the FP video involved this turd of a guy and another FP girl posing as his girl, hiring a prostitute and paying her for bondage and oral. When she was tied spread-eagled to the bed they started tickling her. It took a few minutes for her to get genuinley distressed and after about 15 she was in tears and in genuine fear for her safety; possibly even her life.

She was truly afraid and within 20 minutes was so hysterical that they taped her mouth over to stop her making so much noise. By this time her eyes were red and glazed and her make up was smeared everywhere because of her state. Not only did this pair of walking rectums not let up, they actually carried on FOR ANOTHER 10 MINUTES!!!!!!

When the prick took her gag off she was begging in what was left of her voice, saying that she would'nt call the cops if they just let her go. Once they did let her go, she went for him like a rattlesnake (fucking good for her!!!!) and had to be restrained.

This was followed by the turd who did it telling her to calm down because "it's not like you were raped or anything!" Excuse me? Someone pass me a sledgehammer!:disgust:

The femfeet video was far removed from this atmosphere. Yes it did breach the consent thing, but at least Toni Summers wasn't in fear of her life. The girl in the FP vid could have been imagining that they'd bury her under the patio rather than let her free to tell the cops. At least Toni was already friends with Priscilla and knew she would'nt be harmed.
 
Oddjob0226 said:

There are a few videos out there that actually seem to invole true nonconsentaul tickling..... TJ Productions had one called "Tricked", which I'd love to see. They tickled a model until she used her safe word, and then just kept going. She never shot another video for them.

Are you sure about the name, "Tricked"? It sounds an awful lot like a TJ Productions one called, "Safeword". I read on this forum a long time ago that someone had seen an interview with the woman afterward where she admitted it was faked. Also, she did another video after that for them called, "I Need the Money". Safeword is my favorite video ever, and a big part of the reason is that, in hindsight, I believe it wasn't real, although it LOOKED very real. If I thought it WAS real torture, I couldn't enjoy it in good conscience.
 
Hey Dirkman,
Would you be able to give us some insight as to what insex videos have the best tickling scenes. Your valuable opinion could save some time and money. Thanks.
 
If I thought it WAS real torture, I couldn't enjoy it in good conscience.
Amen to that, NYCity. As much as I love noncon fantasy, I would never enjoy the reality. And I would never buy from anyone marketing what they said was the real thing. Such bullshit tactics offend not only my ethics but my intelligence.

Would you be able to give us some insight as to what insex videos have the best tickling scenes.
If you don't mind my stepping in, leomac - insex doesn't sell videos though I see they've started selling downloadable movies. The best thing to do with insex is subscribe for a month. I haven't checked the price lately - it's somewhere around $50-60 - but you can see 'n save everything in their extremely extensive archive. They don't have whole vids devoted to tickling, but the guy in charge seems to enjoy foot torture (heat, mostly) and tickling himself, and often works it into a session.

As a member of insex you can also participate in the live feeds and suggest what should happen next in the sessions. That might be the best way to get more tickling into their stuff. 🙂
 
I'm trying to ressurect this topic for one reason: Every time I talk about non consensual tickling or in this case, "acted" and "plotted" nonconsensual tickling, I always call upon the video producers like Jeff, and especially TC who put out a video much like what I've described called "of sweet suffering". Why is it that I can never get a comment out of them about this topic?
The Dirk
 
Dirkman -

A "Real, Unfaked, Tickling TORTURE" video requires:

a. A good-looking ticklee willing to experience diabolical tickling
b. A video producer with the nerve to set up and videotape a torturous tickling session, without worrying whether the ticklee will kill them, or worse, never do another video
c. A video producer that believes that the video will sell enough to be worth the effort

If you are holding your breath, you can stop now.
 
What's New

2/25/2025
Visit the TMF Links Forum and see what is happening on tickling sites around the web.
Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** brad1701 ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Back
Top