"Just to play
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/26fd1/26fd19d1da4abaa7d1c36d69761e76f3c46761ae" alt="devil :devil: :devil:"
's advocate for a minute, what about a video which was completely NC, but where the victim "deserved" it for whatever heinous crimes they may have committed? "
Hmmmm... now things are getting interesting! A philisophical look at tickling for punishment. Well....
In the context of a fantasy, I'm all for it.
Going outside the law - well, I would be against it.
BUT, what if it was okay, under the law as punishment to tickle someone intensly for 20, 30 minutes or more - as long as there were no health problems with the covicted person - by correctional agents?I couldn't go out & say someone desrved something any more than performing any other traditional act of vigilantism... but what if a court of law did?
That would be interesting. We still spank in our schools. Lots of countries still use physical punishment in their penal code, and while we in the U.S. like to say we are against that type of thing, lately with all the terrorist and child abuse stories comming out, there have been some low rumblings about what people "deserve".
So now I have to examine.. could I do it? Or watch it happen? To be horribly honset, under extreme conditions, I think I could. I'm not saying this is a GOOD thing, but this is a great form for this type of discussion, and honesty seems to be favored here. I'm not saying I'd tie up my cheating nehibor or anything. But waht if I was in a war and had a captured enemy soldier with valuable information - information that would save American lives, even the lives of the enemy soldier's (preferrable female in my perverted mind) people, in the long run (ie, hit them at a weak point and the war is over quicker =less death all around). Could I do tickle someone unconsentingly then? I think so. So, under CERTAIN CONDITIONS, I think I could.
And before anyone tells me how terrible I am, I've never done this to anyone and don't plan on doing such a thing (well, NJJenn I might make an exception for! Why, if anyone deserves it......). Besides, I'm not alone. When I was in college I read an interesting article about the use of torture (electricity, actually, without the danger of scarring or heart stoppage) in "civilized" countries, the specific question being raised: In extreme cases, and only cases where there is NO question of guilt, could physical means morally be used to get information from a gulty, but uncooperating party? Should the laws of such things be rethought? One of the examples given was what if someone knew where a bomb was planted, but wouldn't give up the info. Another example was this: mothers were asked: if their child was kidnapped and the kidnapper was found, but refused to divulge where the child was, would the mother approve of electricity being used on the prisoner to get the information out of him? All said yes, one mentioning that she would apply the electrodes herself.
So, I guess I'm not the only one with "issues". But if anyone is worried about me, I have been to a NEST and behaved well, I'm planning my own gathering, and want to attend others. I correspond with a number of people on this forum, and so far have been a good boy.