Realbaresoles Candid Soles Clips (updated continuously)

[milagros317]

Latest clip, click my banner below to go to the store. Couldn't be cuter! College freshman from the university across Forty-Deuce from the park, who slyly peeked at the camera as she rubbed her feet together, wiggled her plump toes, and chatted happily (and adorably) with her friend! She sat there for a half hour and ate ice cream and joked with her pal as I photographed her sensitive wriggling tootsies, which were very slightly dirty from her flops. There's nothing I love more than a cutie who looks at the camera with smiling eyes as I shoot vid of her pretty soles!

Great sole shots! Thanks for sharing them here. 😀

 

[Tidas]

So that way he doesn't get sued or put in jail, or have someone file stalking charges etc.

I find it kinda creepy to not get someones permission to have their photo of their feet on a fetish forum. I wonder what they would say if they knew.

I know a few girls who'd most likely file some sort of legal shit against him.

Just wondering is all.

Stalking would not be applicable, as there is not a pattern of behavior represented that suggests it. There is no legal issue with either candidly (or openly) taking photographs of someone, or posting images of someone online. You may find it creepy, and so may these women, but if they filed charges, they would not have a leg to stand on, legally.

 

[seanwoj]

Stalking would not be applicable, as there is not a pattern of behavior represented that suggests it. There is no legal issue with either candidly (or openly) taking photographs of someone, or posting images of someone online. You may find it creepy, and so may these women, but if they filed charges, they would not have a leg to stand on, legally.[/QUOTE

Yes they would have a leg to stand on. Their pictures were taken without their consent, and even though they may have posed just to be nice, none, to my knowledge or the OPs admission, has never given permission to take their pics, or signed a release form. And if they need proof that their pictures were taken, all one has to do would go to the OPs website and look at themselves.


I would like for him or you for that matter to go up to some random strange girl and start taking pictures, and see how far you get before they do something. Or for that matter say "hey can I take pics of your feet and post em on a fetish forum so people can drool over em?" And see how many volunteers you get.

I mean no disrespect to the OP or you, but I was merely asking what is surely on alot of peoples minds here.

 

[realbaresoles]

Yes they would have a leg to stand on.

Really, counsellor? Cite the law I'm breaking. Be specific.

A lot of people out there seem to think that because they don't like something you do, it must be illegal.

I would like for him or you for that matter to go up to some random strange girl and start taking pictures, and see how far you get before they do something.

You might not be paying attention, but that's exactly what I do.

Just check out the mini-clip below -- I shot two segments with this Japanese tourist. She and her friend were talking about my taping, and her friend asked her why I was videotaping her feet. Just look at her response!

 

[realbaresoles]

Latest clip, click my banner to go to the store. This Chinese chick was memorizing something in the park -- she'd read, then look up and mover her lips. She'd let me shoot her soles for three or four minutes, then pull her legs up, keeping them up for 10-15 minutes. But when she put them down again, they were pointed even more obviously at me, she'd peek to see if I were shooting, then rub her feet together! This is an edit to give just the prime sole exposure. She was really tall for a Chinese girl and had much bigger feet than most Asian girls have. Loved her smooth soles and long, silky hair.

 

[milagros317]

Latest clip, click my banner to go to the store. This Chinese chick was memorizing something in the park -- she'd read, then look up and mover her lips. She'd let me shoot her soles for three or four minutes, then pull her legs up, keeping them up for 10-15 minutes. But when she put them down again, they were pointed even more obviously at me, she'd peek to see if I were shooting, then rub her feet together! This is an edit to give just the prime sole exposure. She was really tall for a Chinese girl and had much bigger feet than most Asian girls have. Loved her smooth soles and long, silky hair.

Wonderful sole shots! Very nice that she knew what you were doing and posed for you. Thanks for sharing the photos. 😀

 

[seanwoj]

Really, counsellor? Cite the law I'm breaking. Be specific.

A lot of people out there seem to think that because they don't like something you do, it must be illegal.


You might not be paying attention, but that's exactly what I do.

Just check out the mini-clip below -- I shot two segments with this Japanese tourist. She and her friend were talking about my taping, and her friend asked her why I was videotaping her feet. Just look at her response!

I have done nothing illegal here. What you are doing by taking pictures of random people without thier consent or knowledge is. And if they ever find out, you can and most likely will have legal action taken against you by them.

So again, Did any of these girls sign a release form?

Quit beating around the bush, and answer that question.

 

[angrygreek]

Can you not troll the thread? Any photographer can take pictures in a public space and sell the images. Unless the person is referred to specifically by name and that name has value in the selling of the photos - they are entitled to no money - and even in the latter case - celebrities have this happen all the time and they have a hard time recouperating compensation.

Think if he was just selling serene beach photos - do you think that he would need a release from every person on the beach to sell the photo. Absurd. Just cause you are whacking off to the photos doesn't make them any different. It just makes you feel weird.

Moreover, releases simply protect the photographer from lawsuits rather than be a requirement by law.

So I ask - please do not hijack this thread with your trolling - start another thread or PM him.

Thanks.

 

[camble.com]

Can you not troll the thread? Any photographer can take pictures in a public space and sell the images. Unless the person is referred to specifically by name and that name has value in the selling of the photos - they are entitled to no money - and even in the latter case - celebrities have this happen all the time and they have a hard time recouperating compensation.

Think if he was just selling serene beach photos - do you think that he would need a release from every person on the beach to sell the photo. Absurd. Just cause you are whacking off to the photos doesn't make them any different. It just makes you feel weird.

Moreover, releases simply protect the photographer from lawsuits rather than be a requirement by law.

So I ask - please do not hijack this thread with your trolling - start another thread or PM him.

Thanks.

This is an interesting debate, none the less still images may not be a problem but videoing will be. Here in the UK we have a law called the Data Protection Act and under no circumstance are you allowed to video someone with their face on camera with view to release in the public domain unless they have a) given signed consent or b) clear written signage is on display in the area of filming warning members of the general public. Still none the less these are great pics and hope he don't get caught!! lol

 

[seanwoj]

Can you not troll the thread? Any photographer can take pictures in a public space and sell the images. Unless the person is referred to specifically by name and that name has value in the selling of the photos - they are entitled to no money - and even in the latter case - celebrities have this happen all the time and they have a hard time recouperating compensation.

Think if he was just selling serene beach photos - do you think that he would need a release from every person on the beach to sell the photo. Absurd. Just cause you are whacking off to the photos doesn't make them any different. It just makes you feel weird.

Moreover, releases simply protect the photographer from lawsuits rather than be a requirement by law.

So I ask - please do not hijack this thread with your trolling - start another thread or PM him.

Thanks.

How am I trolling the thread?

I am merely asking a simple question that has been posted my at least 2 or 3 other users that was never replied to. And furthermore, none of these women has ever to his admission signed a release form. And taking pictures on a beach for a magazine or news is different becaue those people have licenses to do so. He does not. He just takes them with his home camera and puts them on the internet.

What he is doing, is taking pictures of women without their knowledge or consent just so he can make a few bucks. That is wrong.

 

[bftk2005]

I love what he does, but I stayed up all night and gave alot of thought as to how to meet the needs of those who find this thread offensive and I think I may have a solution.............If you don't like the thread.......unsubscribe from it and don't read it anymore 🙂 unless you just crave attention.

 

[seanwoj]

I love what he does, but I stayed up all night and gave alot of thought as to how to meet the needs of those who find this thread offensive and I think I may have a solution.............If you don't like the thread.......unsubscribe from it and don't read it anymore 🙂 unless you just crave attention.

I do not find the thread offensive, nor do I crave attention. I am merely asking a question that has yet to be answered since its beginning. I am asking what is on everyone's minds here.

 

[Tidas]

I am asking what is on everyone's minds here.

No you aren't. You are trolling. Also, it is absolutely not in any way, shape, or form illegal to take people's pictures. You can take candid photos all day, every day, forever, and there is no legal concern whatsoever. He doesn't need to have them sign a release. If you feel like he is doing something wrong, then talk to him privately, or better yet, mind your own business. I personally enjoy RBS's work, and would like to see it continue without his threads being trolled. That's what discussion threads and pm's are for. Good day, sir.

 

[seanwoj]

No you aren't. You are trolling. Also, it is absolutely not in any way, shape, or form illegal to take people's pictures. You can take candid photos all day, every day, forever, and there is no legal concern whatsoever. He doesn't need to have them sign a release. If you feel like he is doing something wrong, then talk to him privately, or better yet, mind your own business. I personally enjoy RBS's work, and would like to see it continue without his threads being trolled. That's what discussion threads and pm's are for. Good day, sir.

Again, I am not trolling the thread. I am asking a simple question. This issue has come up in this thread on more than one occasion.

Sure, some may have posed candidly as a nice gesture, but, how many actually said "go ahead, use my pics, sell em, make money so people can drool over em" how many???

Taking pictures of people and selling them online at a porn site without their permission is illegal. No matter what country or state you are in. How would you like it if someone took pictures of you without your knowledge or permission and sold them on a porn site for people to make money too?

So really, open up your mind, and look at the whole picture. Not just whatever you want.

 

[Sandrock74]

If you absolutely need to have this burning question answered, then send the thread starter a PM and discuss your deeply felt concerns there. Otherwise, you're just beating a dead horse and constantly derailing the thread. To quote yourself, "...open up your mind, and look at the whole picture. Not just whatever you want." (emphasis mine)

 

[seanwoj]

If you absolutely need to have this burning question answered, then send the thread starter a PM and discuss your deeply felt concerns there. Otherwise, you're just beating a dead horse and constantly derailing the thread. To quote yourself, "...open up your mind, and look at the whole picture. Not just whatever you want." (emphasis mine)

I am not derailing the thread, nor am I not looking at the whole picture and saying whatever I want.

I am saying and asking what more than one person has asked. Simple as that.

 

[bftk2005]

I am not derailing the thread, nor am I not looking at the whole picture and saying whatever I want.

I am saying and asking what more than one person has asked. Simple as that.

You have already asked him once and he has not answered you. You continuing to ask this question is annoying to me and others who come to this thread to look at feet, which is actually the purpose of this thread. So please let it go or start your own thread in the discussion forum. And by the way let me help you out....I dont think your getting any more of your questions answered.

 

[seanwoj]

You have already asked him once and he has not answered you. You continuing to ask this question is annoying to me and others who come to this thread to look at feet, which is actually the purpose of this thread. So please let it go or start your own thread in the discussion forum. And by the way let me help you out....I dont think your getting any more of your questions answered.

Then by not answering me or the others who have asked him that same question, that says too me he is just being rude.

 

[Schmuck6923]

I used to enjoy coming to this thread, thanks for that.

Most of the girls are blatantly aware that they are being filmed, as most look directly into the camera at one point or another. If they really had a problem with it, don't you think they would've gone up to the guy and said "hey, what the hell are doing??". Obviously, he's not filming them for a science project...

 

[realbaresoles]

What you are doing by taking pictures of random people without thier consent or knowledge is. And if they ever find out, you can and most likely will have legal action taken against you by them.

Let me ask you again, what law am I breaking? Be specific. If you are going to claim I am doing something illegal, be prepared to back it up.

Put up or shut up.

 

[LargerWorld2577]

Question

I have a question for RBS. If a woman that you videotaped found your website and saw that video clips of her feet and her face were being sold without her permission, and if she got upset because of this, would you care?

I’m with Seanwoj on this one. Although, Seanwoj, I can see why others would interpret your questions as trolling, as the answer is clearly no (at least based on the premise of RBS’s work, and if you are familiar with it), they do not sign release forms. However, it is a legitimate debate, and Seanwoj and anyone else who wishes to is valid in raising this question. I don’t know if RBS is “beating around the bush”, does not have the time to answer questions, or simply does not want to. He does have it within him to respond to other people’s comments, though of course only if they are nice comments and do not oppose or question him in any way (who likes being opposed or questioned?), or sometimes he just calls you a “twat”. So, I guess you did kind of get blown off. And regarding bftk2005, we all know what this individual does, going around touching women’s feet without their permission, so it shouldn’t be a surprise that bftk2005 would support what RBS is doing. I’ll address this in a future thread.

Also, to Seanwoj’s defense, bftk2005, I’m going to guess that inferring that Seanwoj’s posts are distracting you from enjoying the content in this thread is a cheap excuse to tell him to stop expressing his feelings about this issue. It’s obvious nonsense, and Seanwoj only asked the question twice throughout the entire thread, along with a few more posts defending himself against you and others. There’s no way you can’t just skim his posts that you don’t like and quickly browse the thread. Pictures stand out more than text; you should be able to just skim the text and jump right to the pictures.

It is still a legitimate moral debate about filming people and SELLING their image, not to mention for the purpose of arousing people with foot fetishes (which I do have, and there’s nothing wrong with enjoying it, but that’s why we have models who know what the foot fetish is and who are paid to model their feet). I also think it’s wise to not bring up the legal status of this issue because you will be asked if you are an attorney, and most likely you are not. I also don’t know for sure if what RBS is doing is legal or illegal. I have looked all over the internet and it’s very ambiguous.

However, this isn’t at all a question of legal or illegal. This is a question of just plain decency and an internal feeling of what to do and what not to do. The fact that RBS and anyone who supports what he is doing state that “it’s not illegal” or “no laws are being broken” is just telling of their character, that they are relying on the legality of something just to get by with their own desires. There are plenty of legal things I could do that I don’t do because I just think they are wrong. If “there is no legal issue with either candidly (or openly) taking photographs of someone, or posting images of someone online” (to quote Tidas), then could I not go to the beach and photograph/videotape children in their bathing suits and start a fetish website about cute children at the beach in their bathing suits? But I wouldn’t do that, and clearly people would get upset about that if I did. Well, that’s all anyone is doing when they question what RBS is doing. They are getting upset, or at least asking questions, because they feel what someone else is doing is WRONG, and they are speaking up about it. And there’s nothing wrong with speaking up about something you feel is wrong, so any attempt to blow you off, such as “you’re trolling” or just not responding to you at all is a suggestion to me that the person knows deep inside that maybe they are wrong and these attempts to silence or discourage people who question them is some sort of defense mechanism.

(Also to add to Tidas’ comment, there are exceptions where you cannot legally photography/videotape someone, such as a mall with a sign that says you cannot take photographs or video.)

Briefly going back to the concept of photographing/videotaping children, RBS does have his own personal policy of not taping anyone under eighteen. He could just prefer taping grown women, which is just a personal preference. However, I would find it to be pseudo-moral and a double standard should it be because of some sort of “moral” reason. Since you can indeed candidly photograph/videotape anyone or anything in a public area, this idea of excluding the videotaping of minors for moral reasons while feeling totally justified in doing the same thing with adults who have no idea what the footage is being used for would suggest three things:

1. RBS feels that there is something inherently wrong with what he’s doing since he won’t do it involving minors
2. If there is nothing wrong with what he is doing, he wouldn’t so blatantly raise an issue about age every time he encounters a person who looks to be on the brink of being a minor and an adult, as seen in his clip store descriptions, but rather just shoot the footage as he pleases
3. He is trying to look “moral enough”, using society’s strong protection of the welfare of minors for his own justification for videotaping adult women. (An “at least I’m not filming minors, so I must be a moral person” kind of justification)

Only RBS knows where he stands on this, but I think he is wrong for doing it in the first place, and should he admit to not filming minors for moral reasons, I think there would be a bit of a logical problem there, as well. To address my first and third points above, the only difference between a minor and an adult in the scenario of being filmed candidly for the purpose of the footage being sold for sexual arousal reasons is that the minor could not consent to that if the person filming came up and asked whereas the adult can. But RBS does not ask any of his subjects. Being “eighteen and over” does not mean you automatically know or have the responsibility to deduce why someone is filming you, and it does not mean that you have to just “suck it up, you’re and adult, you should be aware of sexual fetishes” and be sexual arousal material for strangers on the internet.

Truly decent and considerate people don’t have to live barely within the law or what’s considered acceptable. I think what RBS is doing is definitely inconsiderate. I agree with Seanwoj that people should “look at the whole picture – not just what interests them”. People who support what RBS is doing only do so because they want arousing images of unsuspecting women, and they don’t think about how the women might feel about the situation. It’s selfish and lacking of any consideration for other human beings. To quote RBS:

“I think it's more a matter of how you do it than where you are. I am pretty low key about it, let the woman see what I'm doing, but don't really advertise it, so if she's ok with it she can just let me do my thing and no one is the wiser.”

Well, she might be okay with being videotaped but what she may not be okay with is her image being sold for a profit and put on the internet for people to get sexual pleasure from. This woman is someone’s daughter, sister, friend, wife, mother, aunt, a human being with feelings. So to repeat my question to RBS: If a woman that you videotaped found your website and saw that video clips of her feet and her face were being sold without her permission, and if she got upset because of this, would you care?

To everyone else, I apologize for such a long post. This forum is meant to be fun and enjoyable, and I hate to make it a forum for moral debate. Unfortunately, the nature of this forum can often provoke moral debate and it’s important to be able to feel like you can raise an issue without people trying to silence you or make you feel like the bad guy for doing such, so long as you do so in an intelligent, decent, respectful manner, which I think I have done and which I think Seanwoj has done, as well.

My advice to people who ever find the need to question something: always present yourself intelligently, decently, and respectfully, like I said. Those who you debate against may have sharp tongues or decide to circumvent your legitimate questions, but such can never beat a soft-spoken, calm demeanor that has truth and good intentions on its side. Or, just present one profound question or thought, as I have done, and then leave and never come back unless you have to. Those who you question will have to respond to your question or thought, read it and consider it and hopefully internalize it, or ignore you, and I guarantee in that process that SOMEONE will do some deep thinking, and you’ve just changed another person for the better.

 

[realbaresoles]

Why not post on your usual account name, rather than opening a new registered user name and "concern trolling"? I mean, ESPECIALLY if you are as wonderful and insightful a person as you obviously think you are. That might lend a little more weight to your argument. If you have to open a new account to say it ....

Meanwhile, I think I'll wait for the movie to come out rather than wading through your self-adoring text bricks. 🙂 This is a tickle fetish community. People here know that sometimes it's good to be bad.

 

[seanwoj]

Why not post on your usual account name, rather than opening a new registered user name and "concern trolling"? I mean, ESPECIALLY if you are as wonderful and insightful a person as you obviously think you are. That might lend a little more weight to your argument. If you have to open a new account to say it ....

Meanwhile, I think I'll wait for the movie to come out rather than wading through your self-adoring text bricks. 🙂 This is a tickle fetish community. People here know that sometimes it's good to be bad.

Hold on a minute there, you think that I went through all the trouble of making up a new username?? Really??

If so, you really are not that intelligent. If it means that much to you to show I did not make a new one, have a MODERATOR check the IP address. Believe me, I have better things to do.

Oh and LargerWorld2577, thanks for backing me up.

 

[realbaresoles]

Since it's apparently time for personal insults, let's be perfectly frank here: You're the dumb guy in this conversation, actually:

1) I never accused you of the sock puppeting -- dumbness #1
2) you have claimed the chicks in the clips could sue me but you have absolutely no clue why, based on what law -- dumbness #2

We all know there are stupid people out there but the Internet has made that glaringly obvious, and you are living, breathing proof of that. You've shown that not once but twice in one thread. Are you going to go for the Trifecta? 🙂

 

[seanwoj]

Since it's apparently time for personal insults, let's be perfectly frank here: You're the dumb guy in this conversation, actually:

1) I never accused you of the sock puppeting -- dumbness #1
2) you have claimed the chicks in the clips could sue me but you have absolutely no clue why, based on what law -- dumbness #2

We all know there are stupid people out there but the Internet has made that glaringly obvious, and you are living, breathing proof of that. You've shown that not once but twice in one thread. Are you going to go for the Trifecta? 🙂

Yes the women can sue you for using them on a porn site without their permission. Look up the terms of the copyright 2257. It says you must have permission to use their images in order to use/post/ sell them.

Listen, I am not going to get into an argument with you because I know what you are doing is wrong and immoral. And if you are going to accuse me of making up a false profile, you better be prepared to back that up as well.


I'm done with your incessant BS and accusations.