• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • Check out Tickling.com - the most innovative tickling site of the year.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

Realbaresoles Candid Soles Clips (updated continuously)

To RBS, I’m not looking for any trouble. I hardly post at all. What’s it to you if I opened a new account? I don’t have any content to post or any previously known persona on the internet that I’m so “gutless” to not post under, so it doesn’t really matter who I am. This is who I am now, okay? I’ve admitted to things in the past as said in my previous post. I’ve got nothing to hide. It seems all you can do is attack my reading comprehension, call me gutless, interrogate me, call me a troll (I guess I’m what’s called a “concern troll”, that’s all you do is call people trolls because they oppose or annoy you, now I’ve been thrown into the “concern troll” group. I’m fine with that. I started out posting on this thread because I agreed with another person and just wanted to back him up and offer my own feelings. I said some things about you and what you do but I never personally attacked or insulted you. And I never will. You started picking at me with the “gutless” and “reading comprehension” remarks. I’m not looking to fight with you. Finally, if there’s some rule against what I’m doing here (since this is your thread and I would assume you should have control over it), then talk to the administrators and have my self-adoring text bricks removed. If what I have to say bothers you, then ignore me, have me removed, or keep insulting me. But other than having me removed, you’re not going to intimidate or shut me up if I feel I need to offer my own feelings, back someone up who I feel is only legitimately expressing their feelings, or call you or others out on things I find either false, weak arguments, or just nonsense.
 
I'm self appointed? Wow.

I wasn't aware I wasn't allowed to voice my opinion around here. Didnt know that qualified me as a self appointed moral guardian.
You are allowed to voice your opinion. And other people have a right to form an opinion of you based on what you say.

I will refrain from elaborating further on what I have already said about you. And I will thank the Moderators for including an Ignore List function on this site.
 
You are allowed to voice your opinion. And other people have a right to form an opinion of you based on what you say.

I will refrain from elaborating further on what I have already said about you. And I will thank the Moderators for including an Ignore List function on this site.

Whatever mils. Just one man voicing his opinion, and he gets bashed for it. Says to me you really don't care about morality.
 
“Free speech is a right but all voices do not need to be heard all the time”? Sounds like “free speech unless it disagrees with you”. This isn’t the same as simply looking at a woman’s feet (or her face for that matter) in public. That is a weak argument because eyeballs do not record people’s faces or feet. The reason videotaping strangers in public is such a big deal to me is because of the potential distress it could cause to the people being videotaped. Nevertheless, I’m no law expert, and unfortunately for my side of the argument, RBS still seems to be completely legally justified in what he does. I can and will only argue on the basis of what I feel is wrong, regardless of what the law says. Also, this is not the same as going to a thread just to look at the content and then insulting it just to be obnoxious and disruptive. This is the equivalent of protesting, and peacefully protesting I should add. Like I’ve said, opinions are very important, and while I don’t have any legal knowledge to back up what I’m saying, that’s all I’m doing is protesting. I really can’t believe that anyone with respect and consideration for other human beings would think secretly videotaping strangers to sell the material for sexual arousal purposes is okay, regardless of how legal it may be. Call me a “self-appointed guardian of public morals”, but I would think a lot of people, especially the women in the videos should they find out, would not think this is okay. If people have a problem with my attitude, if you think I’m somehow high and mighty, maybe even self-righteous and condescending, well at least I’m honest. If my “self-appointment” to being a guardian of public morals is so wrong, then maybe your moral stance is better. Therefore, just say that you think what RBS is doing is okay. Say outright that it’s not immoral and that you think there is nothing wrong with it.


I do not mean to say that people shouldn't say what they believe in I just wish more people would edit their speech from the hate that sometimes comes out. Everyone talks differently around coworkers, family and strangers. If we took a step back when posting to think rather than speed reply in anger there might be less arguments. Opinions are opinions and once stated can be judged. I strongly oppose the list of words that are forbidden to speak out of offending someone. When posting in a forum we do not get to see the other person reactions to what is said so we can't know when to edit what we say to avoid an argument to see if what we are saying is understood as we intended to say it. You are right that it is not quite the same since the pictures are more permanent but a memory can be just as vivid. Our society has eliminated the privacy you could have leaving your home and going to a different town or even a place you never visit. Cameras are everywhere and many are always recording something. Some of the women may be relieved to know that rather than some pervert trying to film up her dress is a guy doing something strange but would be viewed as odd. As it is in his state the filming side is legal but the moral side is extremely gray. Unless there is some written code of morality it is our best judgement as a person as to do what is right or wrong and what is morally right to one person is immoral to another.
 
Wow, look at this thing go, and Seanwoj keeps coming back like a narcissist trying to get the illusion of getting the last word while just repeating himself. However, there is an issue here I've yet to see come up, or at least in the last few pages I've read. (I didn't try to go all the way back to where it may have begun).
Once upon a time, when everything was VHS, there were two guys who use to go around with their camcorders, searching for women's barefeet to videograph and then sell to the public for profit. One was on the West coast, one was on the East coast. One was called Solepatrol, while the other was called Footpatrol.
The one on the West coast didn't do so well. He was all right for a while until women started getting angry at him for taping their feet and then selling the videos on line. Even got a spot on the national news. His site shortly disappeared after that, with no word on what happened.
Our east coast fellow's site went down not to long afterwards. I thought he might have been seeing the news stories, but now he's bringing the clips back as downloadable videos.
I have to be honest, I've bought a few of his videos. Meditating on bare soled lovelies at the park on a warm summers day while I'm sitting in the winter of the Northwest. But there was one video where a woman seeing what he was doing started to come over, asking if he was videotaping people without their consent. She started to sound like she was starting to give it to him when the camera suddenly turned off. Rats, I would have loved to have heard the conversation.
But basically, New York is quite a mixture of humanity, living in much tighter quarters than the West coast. There's more tolerance to harmless quirks. A number of tourist just passing through too. Besides, maybe some of them thought it cute, this shy silent guy with a foot fetish quietly videotaping feet. I'm sure they thought he was taping these things for his own silent pleasures late at night.
Then there was the guy who started Tickle Slaves. Hiring these women as models for a bondage video without saying anything about the tickling beforehand. Just wait until they're tied up, camera rolling, and then proceed to tickle the daylights out of them, true non con spirit. Some of the women got together and was trying to drag the guy into court when his website went down. Never heard the outcome, but it looks like Tickling Paradise bought the videos and the rights to them before the court could drag them away from him. What ever happened to him afterwards, I never heard.
I've kind of wondered if some similar fate may someday arrive at Realbaresoles door. When more angry women start to descend upon him, and the news cameras are following him, asking why he's videotaping women's feet, will he be proudly waving his Life magazine cover, declaring it a First Amendment Right? Or will he fold his camera up quick and try to get out of there fast like the West coast guy experienced?
It's interesting to see this conversation happening, but I really don't have a horse in this race.
I did the voyeuristic foot photographer thing for a spell, but I eventually moved up to first hand contact and didn't need nor had any desire to do that anymore. We'll see what develops.
 
Last edited:
Wow, quite a history recap, MrTicklefeet! You know, everyone, I’ve been posting on this thread for just over a week, now. I’ve pretty much said everything I have to say. I honestly have nothing against RealBareSoles personally, it’s just what he’s doing. It’s not just him, it’s anyone who would secretly videotape women with sexual intentions and sell the video for a profit. Besides RBS sometimes being a bit of a tough guy on the internet (which everyone has to learn to forgive, it’s human nature to want to use the anonymity of the internet to be like that) and maybe being a bit of a pervert, it’s not like he’s committing murder, rape, holding up banks, etc. He’s just doing something I find…maybe I shouldn’t say immoral, but inconsiderate, maybe? I don’t think he has that bad of an attitude toward women, either. I don’t find him misogynistic or anything, in fact, he does seem quite tender toward women in a sort of appreciation kind of way. I’m sure he’s a nice guy in everyday life. It’s just that I can’t believe people with any sort of consideration for other people would defend his actions, legal or not, because he still is capturing strangers on video and selling it for strangers on the internet to enjoy sexually.

I see you, MrTicklefeet, tried the voyeuristic thing for a bit (if I read that correctly at the bottom). I admit that I did, too, otherwise why would I be here and how would I know about RBS? Yes, I used to enjoy watching the free stuff of his that use to float around on the internet. But I still feel that I can now speak out against what RBS is doing because I realized what I was doing wasn’t so hot and I stopped, and I never took it to the degree he has. I mean, I went to a park a few summers ago. Most of my efforts involved sitting in a hot car looking to see if anyone was around. I got one young lady to videotape; I actually went up and asked her, but I wasn’t entirely truthful to her why I wanted to tape her (which I think in a way is worse than what RBS does because I engaged this girl, therefore creating a false aspect of friendly acquaintance, comfort, and trust, and then abusing that friendly encounter to get what I wanted). I still don’t think he could quite call me a hypocrite, though, because I felt bad after meeting this lady. I promised her I would never put the video on the internet, which I haven’t and never will, let alone sell it for a profit for strangers on the internet to see. I sexually enjoyed it once, I think, and now it sits on an old DV tape, her privacy completely protected, and I haven’t watched it since because she was very sweet and I felt guilty about what I did.

You also mentioned, MrTicklefeet, one video where a woman confronted RBS and the camera suddenly turned off. You see, RBS is obviously going to only show video where things go smoothly so it looks innocent and harmless, so you never get to see any of the bad experiences except in rare cases. I YouTubed him to see if he was still on YouTube and he has a channel (realbaresoles1). There’s a video titled “Oh Dear” where the woman (who is wearing a skirt, even though RBS says he tries to avoid taping women wearing skirts) notices and is clearly creeped out and uncomfortable. Now, that’s an everyday woman who isn’t a fetish model and who could be someone’s wife, mother, aunt, etc., and the people here defending this and RBS himself thinking this is okay…well, like I said, it just shows what kind of people they are. Not to mention RBS knows nothing about any of these women’s lives while he’s taping, and his “customers” don’t know who they’re pleasuring themselves to. One of these women could have been raped or sexually assaulted in the past. She could have had bad experiences in the past with perverts or just men in general, maybe domestic violence, etc. She could have been abused as a child. And like I said, I feel guilty about my encounter with that young lady at the park because I approached her and had no idea how she was going to feel about it. I admit that I was wrong. I’m just saying it all comes down to other people’s feelings.

Like MrTicklefeet has touched upon, folks, maybe a similar fate of being exposed and possibly caught could come upon RBS one day. I hope for his own sake that he doesn’t have to go through that but rather just stop what he’s doing (of course he probably won’t, but you never know). Like I said, I tried a similar thing to what RBS does, although not nearly as close to the degree to which he takes his filming. Never sold videos, never put anything on the internet, therefore never infringing on a woman’s privacy and comfort, save for one creepy encounter with a lady at a park which I felt bad about after. It’s just my hope that RBS goes through what I did and realizes maybe he shouldn’t do what he does. That’s not condescending at all, that’s saying I’m not perfect, I screwed up in the past, but it feels good to do the right thing in the end. Call this “concern trolling” all you want. I’m just sharing thoughts and feelings and taking part in a discussion.

That should be my last post for a bit, thanks for reading.
 
Last edited:
Like MrTicklefeet has touched upon, folks, maybe a similar fate of being exposed and possibly caught could come upon RBS one day. I hope for his own sake that he doesn’t have to go through that but rather just stop what he’s doing (of course he probably won’t, but you never know).

Classic concern-troll statement.

You can sugar-coat it all you want, you can go the soft-spoken concern-troll route ("hey man, I'm not looking for trouble, I'm just looking to come to an understanding, but ..."), but this largerworld2577 account is nothing more than an attack account, opened for no other reason than to troll another user.
 
Last edited:
Latest clip, click my banner to go to the store. This tall brunette college girl hung out with some friends, one of whom said right away, "he's taping your feet." She looked at the camera a couple of times as I shot footage of her long, pink-soled, extremely high-arched feet, but didn't seem to mind, at one point picking up a magazine and reading it.

 
No matter what state you are in, you have to have permission by the people. Plain and simple.

What the hell, I'm game to ask again. Why do you need to have permission "by the people?" Be specific. "It just is" is not being specific.

Admit it -- you're saying it's necessary even though you don't know.

By the way, you were the first one to send an insult my way, so don't cry when I point out what has become increasingly obvious in this thread -- that you are not the sharpest knife in the drawer. 🙂
 
The one on the West coast didn't do so well. He was all right for a while until women started getting angry at him for taping their feet and then selling the videos on line. Even got a spot on the national news. His site shortly disappeared after that, with no word on what happened.

Not exactly. You are mixing up Sole Patrol and Back 40. Sole Patrol closed for whatever reason, people just have life things that happen to them. AFAIK it had nothing to do with trouble from a woman he'd filmed.

Back 40 got in trouble for a vid he'd shot, and as you say there was some media attention surrounding that, so he took it off his website. To the best of my knowledge (I don't know Washington/California law), there was no potential legal liability to him, he just did it so that it would blow over. It did and he's still in business. By the way, the media attention came from the fact that he goes into establishments like stores and malls and so on, and tells women he is doing some sort of scientific testing involving podiatry, and interacts with them as he films their feet. So the news angle in the local stations was that he was tricking women into exposing their feet, which of course he was. 🙂 He's quite a character, his clips are all over youtube BTW! Here's one in which he tickles the chick's feet (he often does):

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D7EyFzT021U&list=UUkJ4uY-1wnYmq318l49xT0Q&index=2&feature=plcp

Our east coast fellow's site went down not to long afterwards.

Not quite true either. Sole Patrol went off the air in the late 90s and I kept my old store up til around 2005 or 6 (I think it was) -- I was selling DVDs and it was such a hassle to make them I just threw in the towel. But with the advent of stores like C4S, that allowed me to sell the material easily on the net as files, I got back into the business a few years later, largely because many guys on the mousepad told me I should, that they missed my material, etc. It wasn't a very long hiatus.

I've basically been selling this material, with one hiatus of about 2 years, since 1994 (first it was VHS, then DVDs, now files). That's 18 years. I've been around since just about the beginning of the net. 🙂
 
Last edited:
What the hell, I'm game to ask again. Why do you need to have permission "by the people?" Be specific. "It just is" is not being specific.

Admit it -- you're saying it's necessary even though you don't know.

By the way, you were the first one to send an insult my way, so don't cry when I point out what has become increasingly obvious in this thread -- that you are not the sharpest knife in the drawer. 🙂

you have to have permission by those who are in the videos/ pics in order to sell them. If you don't have their permission, then you can't sell the material.

And speaking of not being the sharpest knife, I think that you are the one whos not sharpest one at all. You're just the dullest.
 
Latest clip, click my banner to go to the store. This tall brunette college girl hung out with some friends, one of whom said right away, "he's taping your feet." She looked at the camera a couple of times as I shot footage of her long, pink-soled, extremely high-arched feet, but didn't seem to mind, at one point picking up a magazine and reading it.


She has beautiful and perfectly shaped feet.
 
you have to have permission by those who are in the videos/ pics in order to sell them. If you don't have their permission, then you can't sell the material.

Give the reason why, because if you can't, you've got nothing to say.
 
Latest clip, click my banner to go to the store. This funky, very buxom little latina had some wild hair and, for her shorty stature (about five foot one) some decent-sized feet on her, soft and sensitive looking. She seems to have found my filming highly entertaining, as the clip makes quite clear! Hi def available too, I shot this with an HD camcorder.

 
Latest clip, click my banner to go to the store. This funky, very buxom little latina had some wild hair and, for her shorty stature (about five foot one) some decent-sized feet on her, soft and sensitive looking. She seems to have found my filming highly entertaining, as the clip makes quite clear! Hi def available too, I shot this with an HD camcorder.
Great sole shots. :feets: Thanks for sharing them here. 😀
 
She is beautiful and I love her soles, everything about them especially her big toe. If ever a girl "looked ticklish" she does.
 
Latest clip added (been busy, sorry for the delay) -- click my banner below to go to the store. This one is for the history books, beautiful blonde who saw me shooting, actually adjusted her feet so that I got a better view (or at least it sure seemed that way!!!), and flexed her gorgeous soles (about size 8.5 or 9) right at me as she read her bberry and gave me sly looks! I am not worthy!

 
Oh idk,....maybe because they can sue you? or file charges against you? think about it.

On what grounds, chief? You still don't get it, do you? Take your own advice and, for a change, think about it. There has to be a legal foundation to sue someone. Do you get that much? Ok, if you do, now cite the law that permits them to sue me.
 
Latest clip added (been busy, sorry for the delay) -- click my banner below to go to the store. This one is for the history books, beautiful blonde who saw me shooting, actually adjusted her feet so that I got a better view (or at least it sure seemed that way!!!), and flexed her gorgeous soles (about size 8.5 or 9) right at me as she read her bberry and gave me sly looks! I am not worthy!
Great sole shots! :feets: She has very lovely feet. Thanks for sharing the photos here. 😀
 
On what grounds, chief? You still don't get it, do you? Take your own advice and, for a change, think about it. There has to be a legal foundation to sue someone. Do you get that much? Ok, if you do, now cite the law that permits them to sue me.

I haven't gone back and read every single post here, but I do know that RBS is correct about having either (or both) a Criminal or Civil Law that has been violated in the state that he films/resides in for any of this to be illegal. The "candid" debate has been and will continue to go on just as it has since people started using the Net. I personally enjoy his work and I think that blonde is very hot, yet I prefer to use paid models on my own websites. To each his own and everyone is certainly free to express their opinions, but unless anyone filming "candid or public" type content actually violates a law then it is 100% legal to film anyone in public and then resell it just as the Paparazzi do every single day. It is no different under the law whether or not the intent is sexual in nature because we all know that celebrity feet are very popular and seen by many people as being sexual yet I don't hear anyone talking about Wiki-Feet or The MousePad, who charges a monthly membership fee at HITW to see their celebrity feet archive.

Now there are certain statutes, such as in Florida, where you may film a person in public but you cannot record anything they are saying without their permission, be it in public or not. It falls under a state wire-tapping law that is effective even in a public place where there is no expectation of privacy (which is the legal reasoning behind most of the candid footage being legal). Different states vary with their own "voyeur" laws and federal laws are changing, while "upskirting" is probably the most well-known, but I don't know of any law currently on the books that is specific to filming a persons feet and/or face while they are in a public place and then reselling it with or without that person giving consent.

I know someone may ask me about this, so in advance, yes, I do have a law degree. I have also owned foot related websites for over 12 years and I realize that this debate will continue indefinitely, but didn't everyone commenting actually click on this thread to see the photos or read what was posted? My opinion doesn't matter here since most people seem to be getting into the legal issues but these are the times we live in and I have always liked some candid work, and while this is absolutely legal right now, a few years from now it may very well be a crime.

Sorry for cluttering up your good thread here RBS!! Just thought I would try to explain some of legal issues and I will not be replying to any posts concerning this one, but I will comment on that blonde with the BB. She is HOT and those are some damn good shots!!
 
Latest clip, click my banner below to see more. A short clip with two different segments, both Latinas -- one tiny, exotic and exquisite ... the other with huge feet!

 
Latest clip added, and what a clip! Click my banner to go to the store.

I've been back and forth for weeks about whether this chick is the same as the one in my clip "Tipping Point" -- Her face looks a dead ringer, and certain aspects of her feet do to, but in the more recent segment her feet seem to be a little more curvaceous. Maybe it's just a trick of the light. Have a look for yourself:



Anyway, the funny thing about this one is I was walking over to this area of the lawn to check out another girl altogether, who it turned out had crusty soles, so as I was veering away... BOING!!! these beauties came right into view. Needless to say, I swung into action! I sat there in the blazing sun and shot every moment, totally transfixed by her long, curvy soles and elegantly tapered toes (I particularly love her very long, shapely big toe). She drank a coffee, did some work from her office and had an amusing text message exchange (which frequently made her smile and laugh) as she enjoyed the sun and wiggled her rather large, extremely beautiful feet all around, flexing and pointing them is a way that seemed calculated to show them off to full effect. Alas, she wore big shades so it was not really possible to see if she were looking, and for all I know she had no idea what I was up to.

She looks just like the tipping point girl except the years have made her juicier -- she had a round full belly and was pleasingly plump all around, not fat or anything, just voluptuous, whereas when I shot Tipping Point she was slim as a rail. Anyway, just let the images speak for themselves -- if it were not for the amazing "Playful, Pretty Blonde" segment I just shot, this one would definitely win the RBS academy award for 2012!


 
Latest clip added, and what a clip! Click my banner to go to the store.

I've been back and forth for weeks about whether this chick is the same as the one in my clip "Tipping Point" -- Her face looks a dead ringer, and certain aspects of her feet do to, but in the more recent segment her feet seem to be a little more curvaceous. Maybe it's just a trick of the light. Have a look for yourself:



Anyway, the funny thing about this one is I was walking over to this area of the lawn to check out another girl altogether, who it turned out had crusty soles, so as I was veering away... BOING!!! these beauties came right into view. Needless to say, I swung into action! I sat there in the blazing sun and shot every moment, totally transfixed by her long, curvy soles and elegantly tapered toes (I particularly love her very long, shapely big toe). She drank a coffee, did some work from her office and had an amusing text message exchange (which frequently made her smile and laugh) as she enjoyed the sun and wiggled her rather large, extremely beautiful feet all around, flexing and pointing them is a way that seemed calculated to show them off to full effect. Alas, she wore big shades so it was not really possible to see if she were looking, and for all I know she had no idea what I was up to.

She looks just like the tipping point girl except the years have made her juicier -- she had a round full belly and was pleasingly plump all around, not fat or anything, just voluptuous, whereas when I shot Tipping Point she was slim as a rail. Anyway, just let the images speak for themselves -- if it were not for the amazing "Playful, Pretty Blonde" segment I just shot, this one would definitely win the RBS academy award for 2012!
Wonderful sole shots! :feets: Thanks for sharing them all here. 😀
 
What's New

12/22/2024
There will be Trivia in our Chat Room at 11PM EST this Sunday eve!
Door 44
Tickle Experiment
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** brad1701 ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Back
Top