It's true that there has be to chemistry there for the tickling to be good, it's going to be better if you love them, and they'll open up better if they love you.
But what we're talking about isn't "would he be better than you with your girlfriend".
If every guy believed that KJ was the best, than that would mean every guy would think KJ could tie and tickle their girlfriend better than themselves. Talk about lack of confidence and lack of self-esteem.
Perhaps they should be thinking about how they could learn from Kujman? Seriously though, you make it sound like such an awful thing - being worse than someone else. In many ways being worse is better - you have people to learn from! There are always going to be people in this world better at something than yourself - I'm a good driver but there will be people who are better at driving than me, I'm fairly well endowed but there will be people bigger than me (and in a purely mechanical sense they would be able to pleasure my girlfriend better than me).
This doesn't lower my confidence in any way. The point of love is that you love someone for who they are. You don't go and find the best and love them, instead you work out your differences and problems with the one you love because you love them.
I'm the best in the world at grinding on chicks from the bottom.
What is "grinding on chicks from the bottom"? I know what you're trying to say though, but it's not the same as what we're talking about. Kujman has a group of people saying he's the best, and as I stated before he mostly shies from praise these days. Here *you* are saying that *you* are the best (in jest). That's not the same.
Furthermore he has the pictures to prove it - it's not just an unsubstantiated claim.
The only thing that we're claiming Kujman is better at is the semantics and mechanical skills involved in designing stocks and of bondage. Nobody's saying he'd be better with your girlfriend than you, but he would be able to set a better scene, to tie her more artfully, to restrain her in a safer way.
I'm just looking at some of your posted pictures just now. This is in no way personal so please don't mistake it as such - I am sure you and your girlfriend love each other very much. I also think it is good of you to post those photographs on the internet - it's more than I would do.
If I take this picture as an example,
http://www.tickletheater.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=139435&d=1189192124
It's fine. It's an attractive girl stretched out on a bed. But the lighting is nothing great, it's quite obviously a bedroom (there's no scene or atmosphere), the bondage is simple though she might be able to get out of that and she's sure as hell going to be able to flap around. It's in no way as aesthetically pleasing as some of Kujman's material.
Also,
http://www.tickletheater.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=131116&d=1181806421 is a picture of Meka in "stocks" (a straw chair). It doesn't look secure, it won't feel overwhelming in the sense that there will still be movement. I'm not sure if you've seen pictures of Kujman's stocks, but they are enormous intimidating unmovable lumps of tree.
I'm not saying you'll never produce anything better than Kujman, it's just that you haven't put in the same time and effort into producing those pictures.
The medieval guys had the right idea. They built stocks about 4-6 inches thick. These were longer than they had to be, making them too heavy for one person to lift even if they weren't locked. They used iron manacles, heavy ones which weighed a ridiculous amount. This wasn't pragmatic. It wasn't necessary, 1 inch thick wood is too thick for someone to break out of, and iron any thicker than 5mm would have been effective as a restraint. The reason for such over-the-top restraints is effect. That's it. It creates an atmosphere. There is no point in even trying to wiggle out because you absolutely cannot, you know you cannot. There is no doubt.
There are bdsm websites all round the internet which use stocks, racks, metal stocks... why do they bother when 30ft of hemp is more than enough to completely restrain someone? Effect. And while they probably wouldn't be better with your girlfriend than you, I think it is fair to say they would be able to better, and safer, restrain her.