• If you would like to get your account Verified, read this thread
  • The TMF is sponsored by Clips4sale - By supporting them, you're supporting us.
  • >>> If you cannot get into your account email me at [email protected] <<<
    Don't forget to include your username

Tips for making your own stocks?


:redface: thank you,

im sorry to hear about your computer, we still have everthing that we ever posted in our little section thingy that we have. its under the contributors showroom, i'm sure whatever you lost you could find it again there =).

How was your thanksgiving by the way?

oh, thanks, it was great.

still trying to download all 4 parts of the tickling clip with you getting your gorgeous soles tickled. i can only download 1 every 3 hours with rapid share.
 
birdburdy - When I said "master of disaster" I was sarcasticly joking the use of the word "master". I was jokingly saying that I don't think he is the master of stocks and bondage, or tickling.

The phrase "master of disaster" is a positive thing. It means somebody is good at something.

I was not calling his work or style a disaster, so I was not insulting him. And since I have said that he is good at (insert everything he does) I obviously wasn't insulting him.
 
Last edited:
oh, thanks, it was great.

still trying to download all 4 parts of the tickling clip with you getting your gorgeous soles tickled. i can only download 1 every 3 hours with rapid share.

yeah rapidshare is a bastard i know🙄 , buuuut we will eventually papi will work something out to where we can just post the videos here without having to split them with hacha or anthing like that
 

yeah rapidshare is a bastard i know🙄 , buuuut we will eventually papi will work something out to where we can just post the videos here without having to split them with hacha or anthing like that

thanks! until then, i'm working on the 3rd outta 4 clips. i love them all. your a cute 'lee, you know that? Papi is one lucky man.
 
Hi

I can help you with the design if you like. I'm into 3D modeling which helps you work out all the problems before you start sawing wood.

Here's a capture of my latest crib which is almost a direct copy of FM concepts standard "chairstocks".

I can see two current issues with stock design:

make sure you use the persons weight against them where possible - in floor stocks provide a seat so the person anchors the stocks to the floor.

Find some way of keeping the legs straight - the thigh muscle is the strongest in the body so if you keep the legs straight your stocks won't have to be as strong.

Here's a novel idea - you get bouncy castles but how about bouncy stocks. Inflatable plastic stocks should be able to be rigid enough for restraint but would be easy to move.
 

Attachments

  • fm_chairstocks.png
    fm_chairstocks.png
    44.2 KB · Views: 68
Last edited:
Enough, Papi!

I was told, oh how I was told, that if I mentioned Kujman's some guy some where would get his ego and security crumpled and start a fight. That's exactly what happened here. I thought the fetish world had grown up. It would be good to note that Kujman himself was sent copies of these posts and simply said "Don't waste your time getting involved- you can't change minds already set in cement"

<<shrugs>>

It's taken me a few days to get this info together, so it'll be a long post like yours was. I mean no offense to you Papi but you've made some rather arrogant and misleading statements, which I intend to correct with fact even if nobody listens. Prove me wrong if you can. I hold nothing against you or Meka for you do fine work.

The only reason I joined TT was to find Kujman and meet up with him, and I'm not the only one.

Papi, your entire goal here is simply to attack Kujman and demean his stature. You've turned this thread into a flame. Kay said it best- she called it "tickle envy" as in penis envy. I feel many guys feel slighted by this. That to me is a 'man issue'. (I dated a guy who alway got mad when I mentioned the name of a certain Red Sox player I loved. He'd get all pissy and denounce him just as you are about Kujman- whom I'd bet you've never even met)

You've not listened to a word that Burdy has said, and he makes perfect sense. I'm certain you- like many male ticklers- have a totally closed mind by now and will not even listen to me. However I'm going to speak up this one time about it.

To me dannigrl's statements were arrogant, insulting and rude. So, I said something. She basically said KJ is the best at our fetish. Everybody here likes tickling and bondage, or just tickling, so what she said applies to everybody..

Yes, it does apply to everyone. KJ for all intents and purpose created this fetish-for where do you think it began? On the Internet? With TMF? With you? I'd like to know your answer on this for it, as it's own fetish, had to start somewhere. Who did it? Kj was the first. So who do you credit it to?

Dating it back as far as I can see, this fetish began with Kujman's works and demos. There is not a person here who could top what Kujman can create and the scenes he does in tickling even today - that's just a fact backed up by a million things.

Here's the deal- If you can show me anyone who can do better, I'll sure listen and be the first to change my tune here. Because I've looked for years and never found anyone like him.

He is the best. Those who are insecure will attack it. Those who are smart will embrace it and let him do what he does best- teach it.

I was not rude, insulting, or arrogant- I've been in and around this tickling and bondage fetish world a very long time and feel my statements, even though I'm a female and it's a male dominated fetish, are based in fact and quite qualifed having met and played with so many people professional and non.

I've also met him and played- which makes my opinion even stronger than yours, Papi.

Yeah, I can see how my post might appear insulting way to someone who has an inferiority complex. But that type of person shouldn't be you, Papi. I'd be disappointed if that was true. I'm stating fact, but you're stating opinions.

In EVERYTHING there is a best and a worst. Everything. If you don't feel that way then you're not living on Earth.

Do you watch the Olympics and say, well no one there is the best at anything because that would hurt other's feelings in the sports, just give them all gold medals- anyway, I can do better, ask Meka--??

There is a best at anything. In this fetish it happens to be Kujman, who has done nothing to you or anyone but try to share materials and help teach. Other's have called him the best- never he- very qualified people who have played with many tops. They can't all be liars, Papi.

Kujman is also very different in life than what people here paint him. For one thing, he's a big guy (not as in fat either). He's a lot younger.

He's a very generous, caring, funny, and patient man who donates a huge amount of his time to charities for kids (having lost a child to a drunk driver hitting his car) and taken that tragedy and turned it around into something good.

He was hurt badly in 911 and yet helped others to safety at the same time. (This too was attacked, but the the attackers changed their story and apologized to him when NBC ran a program on it and it showed footage and Kj happened to be on it)

Kujman is the best and the first at most everything in Tickling you can name for me, from having perfected it and put the passion into it. Look at it, date it, you'll see for yourself.

I'll shoot you some undeniable facts gathered from he, from Ticklegal, and several other sources unattached to KJ.

-He created the concept magazine Tied and Tickled. His name clearly "Concept and layout by" section in the very first original. Now I'm not talking about the first run of the magazine from 1982 which yes does house his photos too, very nice. I'm going back even further to the very first original issue in 1980. It has a photo of him on the cover with a saying about "welcome to Kj's playground" or something. And I'll add that he was underage at that time! Who else would have guts like that? No one here for sure.

-He has articles dating back in publications to the mid seventies, one of them Pyschology Today.


-Kujman firsts include among other things many stock designs that are not based in history but from his own creations. This takes some doing. Look at the huge stone URN stocks- Westfield stocks- ren fair stocks- box stocks- Flander's bench. Even the current haybale bondage photos confound people as to how he did it.

-He even had a combination set of breast stocks/front door for one of his theme parties where guests arriving had to tickle the exposed and fastened breasts (or do other treats offered) of the lady, who was strapped to the other inner side of the door, and her screeching begging voice was the doorbell. This was a highlight at the party and just one of them.

-At his theme parties he has a pedestal with a guest sign in book, however the guest book and pedestal actually houses a naked pair of locked in soles, toe strapped in, and you must sign in upon the soles. Now no one ever knows where the rest of the girl is hidden (actually he cut into his wall and she's on then other side) These are things no one can do but he.

As Birdy pointed out, some of those designs are great but so hard to achieve-kuj never takes the easy way out.

-Though I'm not sure he invented it as far as bondage, he was the first to promote toe bondage and had some of the earliest photo sets of it printed, taking it to levels no one could match today. Created techniques that guys, even with your talents, still can't manage to copy. He made toe bars so commonly used today, was the first to use even the simple eyehook bondage. No one's been able to copy his toe stretchers as far as I know.

Think about it Papi- he had NO one to copy. When you have no one to follow and no one to copy and have to come up with your own ideas, that's to be cherished and respected- not shot down like you do here.

-He introduced true applied mumification to the bondage world in the early 1970's, the articles and magazines are out there! That is printed history. That's a technique YOU use all the time, yet the concept of it in fetish terms and techniques came from him.

Where did you learn it from?? You learned it from someplace and something. Kuj had no such teachers. He was the first.

-Someone mentioned plaster bondage? Again Kuj is the best. Why? Simply because he actually does it and took it to such levels. Guys here always write tickling stories about body casts and tickling, all fiction. Some even draw photos, right?

Now honestly tell me Papi- which is harder? Drawing it? Or really figuring out how to make it happen in real time events as Kuj does?

-KJ taught many riggers their craft who now are well known for it, though it's his teaching and photos that did it. The author of the Tickling novel "My Name Is Rand" acknowlegded a great debt to Kuj and what he's done in an emailed post.

-Kuj became a personal friend of the great admired atist Bishop- also called the best- who in turn admired KJ for what he was able to do in realtime. A very fitting original and signed drawing for KJ by this artist is a fitting tribute and hangs on his office wall.

-Kuj has gone out of his way to teach, enlighten, build, and lead the pathways to something more than just slap n' tickle materials of today. He's always ready to help others.

Yet guys like you are so quick to denounce him, attack him, belittle him and the spit upon the tremendous respect you, I and everyone owes him. He made this path is often said. You guys weren't around. I wasn't born.

People like you with your he's-nothing-special-attitude hamper his ability to help anyone today. This thread a perfect example. He would have posted were it not for your flames. Thanks.

- TMF; Even BigJim has gotten some things wrong: Kujman was far more than a moderator. He did help create the TMF when it was in it's planning stages. The guy with the concept, Scott (who went by Psycho at that time), specifically went to Kujman for ideas and layouts, how-to sections and all of it. It was at first just he and Scott. This was verified BY Scott himself to me, Jeff said it to me in an email a long time ago under my old TMF membership (I think it was posted too), and Ticklegal has saved all the emails and IM's between Scott and KJ and shown me. The emails went back and forth a very very long time and you'd be astounded how much of the TMF is Kujman related.

However Kujman also pointed out with great forsight that he felt it would fail in the way that unless there was complete moderation it would become a silly, cheap board with cyber, cheap materials, and flames no different than the floundering AMT. Which it has exactly.

Scott asked him many times to be a part of it more from the start. Kuj was not sold on it, but became a mod, and the best (yes I can see you cringing at that word Papi) they had. When he was there, there were no flames and there were posts about factual information. All since gone.

BTW--Talk about being arrogant!! And how dare you be so arrogant as to say that IF he really wanted to help others he would post here! What an arrogant and assinine statement! Post here for you, so he could be attacked and flamed by you? What the heck would that serve?

You must live in a box not to know that Kuj has helped thousands upon thousands of people over the decades in giving of his own time, his writing, his articles, hands on demos, and posts on his own groups- far more than you have done.

It was his hard work and dedication starting in the early 70's- no one elses- that took tickling out of the S&M world and made it into it's own new fetish way before any internet, AMT, or any other person ever wrote a darned thing.

Yet you so easily discount and disrespect him because you feel slighted by his abilities or experience? Sorry, but I just don't understand it.

Have you stopped driving merely because Jeff Gordon is a better driver than you are? Or do you denounce him of being the best too??

In my reckoning, if you're the first to think up and invent something then you deserve credit.

If you do it better than anyone else, then you are 'the best' at it.

He's taken scenes further than anyone, and I don't mean the intense part- I mean headspace and atmosphere and pure creativity that no one else can do- again, the best. Public scenes, beaches, sorority, club demos. No one has done that.

With respect to you and Meka, even you yourself can't match any photo he's done even those he did 25 years ago.

You- like others- completely disrespect him and usually behind his back.

You-like others- are clearly anti-Kujman having never met him nor attended his demos or played in one of his scenes.

You- like others- claim he says he's the best and all that, which he never has. It's proved by his actions, his creations, and others state it who were there.

Also, KJ isn't the only one who makes stocks in the tickling community, so saying he is the best at that is also arrogant, insulting and rude. It doesn't matter that KJ didn't say it.

I'll tell you whats insulting- some of the stocks out there by those others you speak of. They're a joke.

I never said he was the only one to make stocks!! Sir, you're twisting my words now or can't read right. It's not insulting or arrogant to say that KJ makes the only good ones! Yes, the best and possibly only real stocks in the fetish- that's another fact backed up in photos. Just look, dude! All the other stocks out there are flimsy, thin, with oversized holes stuffed with old sink sponges and towels, some girls even have to have their hands tied in after they're suppossedly locked in.

Now, really Papi! Can you even compare any of those stocks to KJ's? Really? If you say yes, then I have to truly fear for your sanity 😉

Let me also say this; Kujman possibly also makes the only ORIGINAL DESIGN stocks. I've never seen him copy anyone- though they copy him- and many of his in his warehouse arte absolutely fantastic in their concept. He has a plexiglass version of his ren stocks and his flanders bench thats to die for! You can see all through it and it lights up and everything.

Speaking of the flanders bench- this has to be the alltime greatest tickling toy ever conceived or designed by any tickler anytime. Anyone who's ever been on it or seen it has been meserized.

And it came from Kujman's mind and hands.

Has anyone ever topped that? I don't think so. If they have, it's hidden.

I said he makes good stocks and is good at what he does meaning: bastinado, itching powder, roasting, tickling, etc. This means that I think he is good at that that type of our fetish. That is a different type of our fetish, but not better.

He excells at all aspects of our fetish, not just those. Those are his off-shoot. I love the fun simple forms. Glance at his many fun beach buried [in full public] adventures and you'll see yet another depth to him that makes him the best. He captures the moment, unstaged, on film. In all the other photos I've seen of sand burials, it's a joke. The models aren't really ticklish, we all know that if we're to be honest. Because if they were so, they could easily get out of the two inches of sand on them, in some cases no sand on their upper half at all! It's insulting because [to anyone outside of the mere fantasy of it] we know they could get out. I could, so I know they could. Not with Kuj. When he does it, you're stuck, for fun.

Let's not forget his added dimension even to that fun; he does NIGHT TIME burials by torchlight or under moonlight. What could be more erotic than that touch? No one sle does that.

So there you have it, Papi. Kujman HAS created things, things and designs used all the time in TK today commonly but he and he alone was the first to invent them. Long before you or anyone else did. That makes him the original and the original is the best. He can do things in tickling, bondage and this fetish that you, I, and others simply can not. This is not a slight on anyone for everyone has their own talents in life and his is creation- he perfects everything. Such as Lew Ruebens is the best at bondage.

This fact about Kujman and his name alone obviously irritates you, meaning that the facts must be true. Yaqi has no talent yet declares himself the King of Tickling, yet you don't attack him for that.

Your mind is your own to make up, but facts are facts. Flame him all you want to. At this stage of his stature he's impervious to sensless opinions and attacks like the pyramids themselves. You can say all you wish yet one of his photos dissolves away all you say. I'm sure he doesn't care because he's still engaging in all this fun and comments and attitudes such as yours simply deny others that same fun from him. So you're doing a disservice to them, not him.

I'm going to leave this thread with now this last thought for you to truly consider, Papi. You say he's not the best? His recent set of photos with the girls in haybale bondage packed in tight for tickling as they pop off a conveyor belt from a hay bayler is magnificent. The video clips more so. Not staged or acted as you and others might do, but realtime. Just how he created and did it electrifies and mystifies all, except for those involved here online who met him and did it at Halloween. It's yet another Kujman dream brought to life that no one else has done or can do. Another original.

With permission I'll attach a photo if I can figure out how. A photo they say is worth a million words. This one spells out "the best".

Papi, I'm going to continue to enjoy your work and posts but won't post further on any of it.

I'm sorry for anyone who has been upset or annoyed by any of these posts. I simply wanted to help some of those wishing to make stocks by sending the best talent I could find to you. However, since as Papi alludes to there's so many other experts out there, I suggest you ask them. Just get a good supply of sponges and towels.
 

Attachments

  • c1.JPG
    c1.JPG
    110.2 KB · Views: 147
  • c21a.JPG
    c21a.JPG
    86.3 KB · Views: 134
As those of old can testify, I find it impossible to be concise. Be warned that I’m about to waffle a lot. 😀


- TMF; Even BigJim has gotten some things wrong: Kujman was far more than a moderator. He did help create the TMF when it was in it's planning stages. The guy with the concept, Scott (who went by Psycho at that time), specifically went to Kujman for ideas and layouts, how-to sections and all of it. It was at first just he and Scott. This was verified BY Scott himself to me, Jeff said it to me in an email a long time ago under my old TMF membership (I think it was posted too), and Ticklegal has saved all the emails and IM's between Scott and KJ and shown me. The emails went back and forth a very very long time and you'd be astounded how much of the TMF is Kujman related.



Read back and I think you'll find that I didn't say anything that contradicted that. I never denied that Scott asked Kuj for advice and the subject of helping design or layout didn't come up at all. I was aware of both and didn't deny them. Given the pseudo-Magazine pages Kuj very conspicuously had on the old Tom Hawkins Adult Tickling Site Scott would probably have asked Kuj first even if he'd never actually been involved in r/l with any tickling scenes of his. (Whether he was or wasn't I haven't a clue.)

I just felt moved to contradict you, because the way you said, "You know the TMF? Kujman founded that" implied that he was sole creator of it, which he wasn't. It also implied that he held joint "rank" on it with the founder and owner, which he didn't. Kuj was a Mod, not an Admin. He was an assistant and advisor to the founder, not a partner with him and ceased to have any significant input on the TMF after the aforementioned, well-publiscised row. That he had more tickling experience and was a better stock constructor than Scott probably ever will be is a different issue and probably a given. (I say probably, because Scott went into his religious phase not long after the TMF – as opposed to the ezBoards P’sTMF was created and I only knew him briefly through that.) That he may have had more fulsome ideas on getting the new gimmick over is too. Showmanship isn’t something Kuj has ever been short of.

The fact that Scott had a one-eighty, now means that his title of founder is purely honorific and if it weren’t for the fact that MTP Jeff’s title was “Co-Founder” (of the current incarnation, not the original), no-one would even remember Scott had done anything at all. In the TMF as it exists now, Scott doesn’t have any credit and rightfully so, because he’s been gone for over seven years. The TMF, for all it’s many faults, (most of which are a result of a confederacy of argumentative wankers who just live for being knobbers on the P&R board) is a place that promotes a colossal amount of real life interaction and as a medium it has changed the lives of most people who got seriously involved in it. Scott, despite being the founder, gets none of the credit for that, even though the idea was originally his. Other people grabbed the ball and ran with it. Scott is not directly comparable to Kuj, that much is obvious, because he left the tickling world altogether and ceased to have any contribution, but the principle is what I’m driving at.

I won't take away anything from Kuj that he's due and he knows that. But I also won't fail to recognise that the online side of things was separated from him a long time ago (much to Kuj's own satisfaction so I gather) and went its own way, making available r/l stuff all of its own. Yes, tickling stocks might not ever have become popular without Kuj making them "mainstream" in the tickling community, but even if they hadn't, it would have gone its own way. Something else would have been found, clips and parties would now use other stuff. Saddos who never make it to real life tickling because they sit in front of computers too much, would whack off to stock-less clips.

Kuj has undoubtedly marked his place in modern tickling history, but so have a lot of other people and their contributions do not pale into insignificance next to his, any less than the spread of protestant doctrine pales into insignificance when set against Catholicism.

Kuj’s material and his style will have its fans, but that doesn’t take away from the style of others, nor does it diminish their achievements. The man himself has said publicly that he doesn’t wish to be exalted as some sort of tickling god (quite wisely in my opinion) and I think posts that exaggerate or misrepresent what he’s done, in whatever medium, don’t help him. Indeed I think people are turned off by it, because they see posts like the ones you’ve just made as condescending and belittling of others. When you spend half a page praising Kuj and sounding like a defence barrister, it makes it look even more so, even though Kuj didn’t post it. There would be a guilt-by-association thing going on.

As the saying goes, by a man’s work shall ye know him. So let Kuj’s latest material stand by itself and just correct errors where they spring up if someone says something that’s just plain wrong. Don’t post about it in a way that could be mistaken for a eulogy, because it’s counter-productive. Also don’t assume that anyone who disagrees is having one big fuck-off ego trip, because that just looks defensive and turns people off who would otherwise be interested. Accept that there’s material out there that other people will prefer to Kuj’s and which doesn’t denigrate his at all. After all, some people prefer the Big Mac to lobster. I’m one! That’s why “better/worse” and “good/bad” is subjective unless the bad you’re talking about is something to do with safety. That’s a universal thing. Everyone’s perspective is their own and there is no universal definition. That the male half of the tickling world are 95% jealousy-mongers is a mathematical impossibility.

That’s not a flame and I’m not jealous. I freely admit that my own stocks look like shite next to Kuj’s. They took hours longer than they should’ve, they have crap dribbly marks where the varnish ran and I had to make several adjustments to them over time as they were used and I saw things that would be better if refined (I’m a less able carpenter than Abu Hamza, so I had to resort to padding because the holes weren’t as smooth as they could’ve been). My original idea for using both stocks and a metal eyelet for toe-tying came from seeing Kuj’s pictures on the Hawkins site, but building them, using them and trying to make them better over time was entirely my accomplishment.

This isn’t about saying Kuj’s stuff isn’t as good as it is, it’s about acknowledging what other people have achieved too. They’ve done so in different ways and certainly to different styles, but in their own way they have walked the walk. Admitting that takes nothing away from Kuj that is rightfully his. Trying to deny it just makes you look argumentative.
 
I'm sorry for anyone who has been upset or annoyed by any of these posts. I simply wanted to help some of those wishing to make stocks by sending the best talent I could find to you.


That's something very few, if any, will dispute. I've never seen stocks anywhere that look as good as Kuj's and that's the truth. Just wish I had an extremely large cellar!:weird: :tounge:
 
You know I've been watching this thread now forever and seeing a lot of hot air blown about. Kuj is this, Kuj is that, Kuj is no good, Kuj never did a blasted thing for tickling, I hate Kuj, I'm better than Kuj. I wish everyone had just shut up so he would've posted and we could have some decent stocks going up in videos instead of the cardboard junk we see.

What it looks to be is jealousy. People never seem to want to give anyone their due. Kuj created much of what we have today but no one wants to admit that. Guys hate him, but love his work. ??? Wow. Mind blowing, man. If you want to attack the man I suggest you first go meet him, see his club gig, or play in one of his scenes. I absolutely freakin' guarantee you'll come back a fan.

Bigjim, I respect you and all man, but Papi attacks makes it all about Kuj. Danni stayed on target by answering with what I found to be great information. I didn't read her post the way you did at all. She merely kept it on target about him. She didn't put anyone down. I think she even said she liked Papi's work. The information was great. I had sort of heard about the death of his infant daughter some years ago. I knew he helped create the TMF because I would sometimes go into the chat room with he and Scott as Kuj was laying out idea after idea for him. Most of them exist on the TMF today. I know Scott tried a long time to get Kuj to found it, but he wouldn't for the reasons Danni listed. Then Jeff came along. Everything Kuj predicted came true. Yeah, I wish Scott would get more credit, Kuj too.

But Jim, Papi is the one here saying negative things, not Danni. Maybe rethink your aim. People have a right to answer to accusations. You're almost acting as if Kuj has no such right and just Papi's words should be heard. When a girl actually steps up here and lists the many achievements of anyone positively and the much good he or she has done, you would accuse her of belittling others? How is this so? I didn't see her say anywhere that Kuj did it all. He did start it, yes. For that we owe him. But he'll be the first to say many have added to it. There was no need for her to list everyone else's contributions. Apparently Papi was unaware of Kuj's achievments and she set it straight, that's how I viewed it. Over and done. I love Papi and his photos but really he seems to have a bug up his butt about the whole thing.

Agree or disagree, doesn't matter, it's a free world. But I want to point out one undeniable thing. One fact was proved by this very thread and in a way Papi unwittingly helped prove it. If you erase all these posts, or even add a million more to them, still the most exciting things on this entire TT are KUJMAN'S NEW HAY PICTURES! God, man! Those are hot. The whole hay bale machine idea was hot hot hot. This proves to me and probably anyone seeing the photos that kuj is still the creme de la creme of tickling and bondage.

(see? I didn't call him the best!)
:laughing:
 
You know I've been watching this thread now forever and seeing a lot of hot air blown about. Kuj is this, Kuj is that, Kuj is no good, Kuj never did a blasted thing for tickling, I hate Kuj, I'm better than Kuj. I wish everyone had just shut up so he would've posted and we could have some decent stocks going up in videos instead of the cardboard junk we see.


For what it's worth I don't see anything denigrating Kuj in the manner you describe. No-one has attempted to take away (so far as I can see) one prop from the man that he's earned. Witht he foundation of the TMF thing I was just clarifying a few facts (and I've promised Kuj I'll clarify a few more too). The statement "Kujman founded the TMF" is innacurate. He helped it. He worked with Scott, and others, to start the thing off. Then there was a row. Different people's accounts of that row differ drastically.

What it looks to be is jealousy. People never seem to want to give anyone their due. Kuj created much of what we have today but no one wants to admit that. Guys hate him, but love his work. ??? Wow. Mind blowing, man. If you want to attack the man I suggest you first go meet him, see his club gig, or play in one of his scenes. I absolutely freakin' guarantee you'll come back a fan.


Jealousy this, jealousy that. What I have consistently seen when Kuj has met an audience which is not familiar with him, is a captive audience. Most, I repeat most people want to learn from him because they see his pictures and then their jaw bangs on the floor. Me included when I was new to the community! Who wouldn't, apart from a plank?

Bigjim, I respect you and all man, but Papi attacks makes it all about Kuj. Danni stayed on target by answering with what I found to be great information. I didn't read her post the way you did at all. She merely kept it on target about him. She didn't put anyone down. I think she even said she liked Papi's work. The information was great. I had sort of heard about the death of his infant daughter some years ago. I knew he helped create the TMF because I would sometimes go into the chat room with he and Scott as Kuj was laying out idea after idea for him. Most of them exist on the TMF today. I know Scott tried a long time to get Kuj to found it, but he wouldn't for the reasons Danni listed. Then Jeff came along. Everything Kuj predicted came true. Yeah, I wish Scott would get more credit, Kuj too.


Look, I imagine Danni wants Kuj to be taken seriously, just as you do? Just as I do? If that's the case beating people over the head with praise worthy of a temple maiden and comparing Kuj to the pyramids is just going to make half the people think "What the fuck?" and the other half piss themselves laughing.

But Jim, Papi is the one here saying negative things, not Danni. Maybe rethink your aim. People have a right to answer to accusations. You're almost acting as if Kuj has no such right and just Papi's words should be heard.


I didn't say Danni was saying negative things, I said her positive things were so strangely worded that they were having a negative effect. As to Kuj having the right to answer, hell I'd welcome the man posting here! Kuj, get in here! Let him post a thousand words or so on wood preparation, treatment, how to use bolts instead of screws, how to use straps to make the lee more comfortable and how to construct it so it breaks apart easilt for storage and how to make the holes as symetrical as possible and totally smooth. If he did everyone who posted on this thread would love it, including me!

And so far as I can see, all Papi has done is voice his own opinion. He certainly doesn't seem to have a negative opinion of Kuj, as can be seen from this last post...

birdburdy - When I said "master of disaster" I was sarcasticly joking the use of the word "master". I was jokingly saying that I don't think he is the master of stocks and bondage, or tickling.

The phrase "master of disaster" is a positive thing. It means somebody is good at something.

I was not calling his work or style a disaster, so I was not insulting him. And since I have said that he is good at (insert everything he does) I obviously wasn't insulting him.

Papi definately doesn't seem like an detractor of Kuj's techniques, he's just someone asking questions and trying to grok the situation. If someone asks a question, it doesn't mean they disagree with the existing answer, they just want to know why.

I am not Kuj's enemy and never have been. I admire his stuff.

Agree or disagree, doesn't matter, it's a free world. But I want to point out one undeniable thing. One fact was proved by this very thread and in a way Papi unwittingly helped prove it. If you erase all these posts, or even add a million more to them, still the most exciting things on this entire TT are KUJMAN'S NEW HAY PICTURES! God, man! Those are hot. The whole hay bale machine idea was hot hot hot. This proves to me and probably anyone seeing the photos that kuj is still the creme de la creme of tickling and bondage.


Thay are damn good! Definately a concept I haven't seen before.
 
Look, I imagine Danni wants Kuj to be taken seriously, just as you do? Just as I do? If that's the case beating people over the head with praise worthy of a temple maiden and comparing Kuj to the pyramids is just going to make half the people think "What the fuck?" and the other half piss themselves laughing.
I think that's a really good point. Let people make up their own minds about him. If he's great then they'll discover for themselves that he's great.

I'm a big Kujman fan, but I would agree that hearing "Kujman's amazing" at the end of every - single - thread followed by a list of flames is tiring. Give him room to breath for goodness sake.
 
I'm sorry guys, throw my mod powers away for a moment...

This is by FAR the dumbest argument I've ever heard, nobody cares if Kuj is the be-all end-all of tickling. You could tell me he's the Lord and Saviour, and, I honestly wouldn't care. This thread is so derailed its ridiculous, lets get back on topic of Norm building stocks, where this thread is originally intended to be.

And, go ahead and flame me, but, if your gonna do that, make a new topic or something. No need to ruin Norm's visit by derailing his thread.

Thanks,
~Chameleon

PS, I didn't mean to offend, if I did. BUT, I do want to keep Norm's thread on track, so remember, back to Norm's stocks!
 
Bravo Chameleon and bb. Both last points well made.

Apologies Cham, my bad.

Yes, have we got any stocks updates?
 
Yes, have we got any stocks updates?

Here are some drawing I made. I'm sure people will recognise this design! As always though, the devil's in the detail.
 

Attachments

  • path2236.jpg
    path2236.jpg
    36.7 KB · Views: 18
  • stocks-cropped.jpg
    stocks-cropped.jpg
    295.7 KB · Views: 16
What is the wood you think is best to use bb? I've used pine in the past, because it's soft, easilly treatable and doesn't splinter too much. But is there a better one?
 
What is the wood you think is best to use bb? I've used pine in the past, because it's soft, easilly treatable and doesn't splinter too much. But is there a better one?

I actually use Norway Spruce. It has very similar properties to Pine, including the lovely smell when you saw it quickly with a coping blade. I'm sure pine is good too. I like spruce because it's really soft and easy to work with, and it cuts cleanly. The worst stage of building the stocks is the sanding bit and spruce is good for this.

The diagrams I posted are designs for my stocks. They were really meant as a prototype to learn from, but actually turned out ok. They were built entirely of 2x4 spruce. The stand is in total 6 pieces, 3 each end bolted together with 10mm steel bolts. The middle piece of 2x4 is lower, so that there is a 2" gap to accommodate the stocks:
Code:
__  __
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| |_| |
| | | |
| | | |
This way the whole thing can be taken to pieces for storage. The stand can be used for future (thicker) stock designs I build by just replacing the middle two pieces of 2x4 with the same thickness of wood as the stocks. Having the stand constructed like above means that there are posts to which a pole can be attached, potentially for toe-bondage.

I don't use padding. If I had to use padding I would attach it to the person, not the stocks. I'd probably use those arm-stocking-things which seem to be in fashion now. One trick for avoiding padding is to have multiple sets of stocks, which is a bit more work. You can use a simple trick though:

Stocks are in two-halves: top and bottom. You need four half-egg-shaped holes in each, so that's eight holes to cut... so what if you want two sets of stocks?! You don't actually have to cut sixteen holes... just another eight. The trick is not to centre the ankle holes around the vertical: cut slightly more out of the bottom set. When you need bigger stocks you can often get away with just replacing the top half with something deeper cut.

I really want to build some really heavy hardwood stocks when I have the time and resources.
 
thanks for all the help, guys.

i'm making simple ankle bondage stocks which can be tied to a bed, nothing too fancy. if this turns out good, i'll make some full sized stocks, but that'll be a while away.

trying to use all 2" X 4" wood with this one, but without all the fancy cutting. gonna use a typical circular saw, and gonna buy a jig-saw for the ankle holes.

i think i've got some ideas for that. i want to be strong, but not too heavy, either.

but i'll take all these into accounting, especially when i get around to making full sized stocks for my lucky 'lee.

@Norm:
Do you have an updated stocks design you can show us please?

currently working on that. might be next week before i can finish it and submit my final design.

one major thing is, i have decided to go with the shag carpet for the ankle padding, but, i'm making it to wear i can replace it with vinyl padding stuffed with cotton just in case the carpet doesn't work, and so i can change this in a couple minutes, so it doesn't ruin the mood, ya know.
 
Last edited:
thanks for all the help, guys.

i'm making simple ankle bondage stocks which can be tied to a bed, nothing too fancy. if this turns out good, i'll make some full sized stocks, but that'll be a while away.
What you could do is build these stocks so that they could be used in the full-sized ones later.

trying to use all 2" X 4" wood with this one, but without all the fancy cutting. gonna use a typical circular saw, and gonna buy a jig-saw for the ankle holes.
Powertools for 2x4? That seems like overkill. You can get away with just using a coping saw (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coping_saw) and a tenon saw. The cutting isn't what takes the time in stock building.
 
i actually want to make 2 separate stock units, so if my 'lee just wants simple stocks, we can do that, instead of dragging out and re-assembling the big stocks.

and yes, power tools are faster and worth it. what i meant was avoiding using more complicated tools, like you'd see on a Bob Vila show like This old House or that other carpentry show...
 
Burdy, in December I had a chance to be in the actual original model for your design of stocks. They were great. From all views they worked. They're very big, too. I'm pretty flexible so it was a piece of cake going in but I assure you no movement was had at all!
 
Burdy, in December I had a chance to be in the actual original model for your design of stocks. They were great. From all views they worked. They're very big, too. I'm pretty flexible so it was a piece of cake going in but I assure you no movement was had at all!

Cool - are those the ones with holes for three people side-by-side? I've seen some pictures of those - they look incredible!

Mine aren't nearly as big. I simply don't have room for huge stocks... but one day..! I guess I'm still at the learning / practising stage of stock-building (and there are soo many small details you cannot learn without actually doing it, and seeing for yourself).
 
Cool - are those the ones with holes for three people side-by-side? I've seen some pictures of those - they look incredible!

Mine aren't nearly as big. I simply don't have room for huge stocks... but one day..! I guess I'm still at the learning / practising stage of stock-building (and there are soo many small details you cannot learn without actually doing it, and seeing for yourself).

Well I've been in two of his Westfield versions. He had many other various stocks he prefers to use. I saw the one he uses for sorority things there. He had the older original version of sorority stocks there too, but it wasn't used. My favorite is the huge greek urn stocks made of stone. But the ones you speak about, of the two I was in one of them held three people and one of them held just two people. I kind of enjoy being locked in alongside someone else and sharing the ride.
 
Bumping it up because it's my turn to try

:redface:Aha...so I recently decided to go ahead and build stocks. I am not much of a carpenter either, but I figured I could do two pieces of wood with a latch on one side and a hinge on the other. Then, I figured I would buy two clamps and attach it to the footboard on the bed.

So, I have the two pieces of wood (2x6, I think) 3 1/2 ft long. I got the ones with knot holes, so it was cheaper. I have the holes drilled on either side, and two close together in the middle.

This weekend, I hope to assemble the stocks. I bought some insulating spray foam to put on the holes, and some upholstery tacks to attach blanket strips on top of the foam. I'm not going for an authentic look; just something to use for private bedroom tickling.

Unfortunately, I tried to email Kujman, but I haven't heard back yet. I still hope he emails back, but I kind of figured out the problems I was asking him about.

So, wish me luck! Hope to be able to have a good report back next week!
 
tougher than I thought

And so...

Today I had time to put it all together. The hinge was easy. The latch was tricky. I thought a latch with a twisting "lock" would be best, being as how it is easy for the 'lee to be able to get out without problems. Also, a real lock would be too scary for some.

Now, padding. What a disaster. I used a liquid foam. It is very difficult to use on wood, and it would not stay on the rim of the holes. I got it in my blanket (that I was using as a floor cover), on my rug, and on the plastic tote I was using to prop it up. Then, when it dried, the whole foam decreased into a flat mess, as opposed to staying "puffy". Not to mention that I got it on my hands (I know it said to use gloves, but, I'm a guy), and washing it off almost stopped up the drain.:rant: I poured some nail polish remover down the drain, and will use it on my carpet rug.

Now, I tacked down a cloth around each hole. This, along with the deflated foam, did not make a soft fit, and it also did not fill enough of the holes to make it the desired "snug". So, I cut some fabric, folded/rolled it over about 10 time, and cut it to the size of the rim. I then nailed the two ends of the rolled cloth into the holes. I now have a padded and smaller hole (4 inches would be too big for my fiancee--should have gone with 3 inches), but I had to reattach the latch a couple times. Because of the latch I selected, the stocks open a bit on the non-hinge end.

But, ah well. I did it. I made stocks for a fiancee who is understanding, supportive, and enticed by my bondage/feet tickling fetish. If nothing else, I have a decent prototype. I'm somewhat proud, and anxious to see her reaction. She took the camera with her for the weekend, so I can't post a photo tonight.

Wish me luck, and happy tickling!:redface:
 
What's New

11/23/2024
Visit Clips4Sale! Tickling clips beyond number!
Tickle Experiment
Door 44
Live Camgirls!
Live Camgirls
Streaming Videos
Pic of the Week
Pic of the Week
Congratulations to
*** LadyInternet ***
The winner of our weekly Trivia, held every Sunday night at 11PM EST in our Chat Room
Back
Top