Would you allow me to deeply despise you for a... say... one full minute?
Thanks.
...
* Deeply despises Norm for asking *
...
Now... over most sensible places in the world, a gun would be considered a dangerous piece of walking whupass, something you don't want shoved down your throat, or up your ass.
Over most sensible places in the world.
...
Over a fairly extensive, yet not so densely inhabited stretch of land, anything under a .45 ACP is routinely scoffed off as - I'm quoting freely here - "gay".
When they invented those rounds, all the way back in time, they often had in mind officers, policemen and other guys who could use a handarm, but wouldn't put up with the weight and bulk of a full rifle.
If you shoot somebody in the nogging, or straight in the heart, from say 20-40 yards, then yes, anything but a sound suppressed .22LR can be considered lethal - and thus effective.
If you are asking me if you can down a moose or a ravenous bear with one shot, using those peashooters, then, as you have probably guessed already, the answer is nay.
...
It would be an interesting topic, debating of USA vs Europe gun philosophy.
And give rise to questions such as: why in many American states is wholly legal to pack a .50 AE revolver, but you can't have a 15-shorts-magazine Cz.22?
...
Maybe next time. 🙂