That's why many dungeons have sign-ins, releasin' 'em from responsibility for YOUR play. Some folks renege afterwards, for a great variety of reason. Sometimes, it's even true that one of the players was out of bounds, so to speak.
It's part of why the West Coast Gatherings' questionairre asks about experience with such, and why our event invites mention rules so stringently. No one wants to lose a home 'cause someone doesn't know how to say no, or doesn't know how to listen. We're rather decisive about such. Always amuses me when folks argue safewords and such, 'cause the legal bounds WITHOUT safewords leaves no avenue of defense. With 'em, you have clear intent to play consentually, and an established means for safety.
Still think we oughta yank this part of the thread to a separate thread. It ain't really religion, guilt or evil, y'know? Good topic, though. I want Mia in on this, and dunno if she even READS this thread.
my $0.02,
dvnc
It's part of why the West Coast Gatherings' questionairre asks about experience with such, and why our event invites mention rules so stringently. No one wants to lose a home 'cause someone doesn't know how to say no, or doesn't know how to listen. We're rather decisive about such. Always amuses me when folks argue safewords and such, 'cause the legal bounds WITHOUT safewords leaves no avenue of defense. With 'em, you have clear intent to play consentually, and an established means for safety.
Still think we oughta yank this part of the thread to a separate thread. It ain't really religion, guilt or evil, y'know? Good topic, though. I want Mia in on this, and dunno if she even READS this thread.
my $0.02,
dvnc